Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 10471596 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Validity of markers of dilution in small volume lung lavage.

American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine ·Vol. 160 ·No. 3 ·1999-09-00 ·Pages 778-84

Dargaville PA, South M, Vervaart P, McDougall PN

Abstract

Definitive analysis of solute concentrations in lung lavage fluid involves the use of a marker of dilution to correct for variable recovery of epithelial lining fluid (ELF), but the question of the most appropriate dilutional marker remains unresolved. In lavage fluid collected from infants with lung disease and healthy control subjects, we examined ELF concentration of protein, albumin, sphingomyelin (SM), and IgA secretory component (SC), and critically appraised the relative validity of SC and urea as dilutional markers in the context of lung infection and lung injury. Protein, albumin, and SM were found not to be valid dilutional markers, as their ELF concentration varied significantly between the diseased, recovering, and normal lung. Differences in concentration were noted in both tracheal aspirate samples (TA, 4 x 0.5 ml) and nonbronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (NB-BAL, 3 x 1 ml/kg), but were not uniform (e.g., TA-disease versus control: albumin 2.8 versus 0.68 mg/ml, SM 45 versus 16 microgram/ml, both p < 0.05; NB-BAL-disease versus recovery: protein 8.1 versus 4.8 mg/ml, albumin 2.9 versus 1. 4 mg/ml, both p < 0.05). Overall, SC concentrations in ELF were not different between the diseased and normal lung, but in the NB-BAL samples, significantly higher SC concentration was noted in viral bronchiolitis and pneumonia than in noninfective lung diseases. No clear evidence of additional influx of urea into lavage fluid in association with epithelial disruption was found in the diseased lung. Comparative analysis of SC and urea revealed no difference in TA samples, but in NB-BAL specimens, urea best standardized the lavage concentration of surfactant indices to correspond to the degree of lung dysfunction as indicated by oxygenation index. We conclude that SC and urea, but not protein, albumin, or SM, are valid dilutional markers with which to estimate ELF recovery during small volume lung lavage. Urea appears a more appropriate choice in return fluid derived from the distal tracheobronchial tree, and SC should not be used in the context of lung infection.

MeSH Terms
Albumins/metabolism Analysis of Variance Biomarkers/analysis Bronchoalveolar Lavage/methods Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid/chemistry Humans Immunoglobulin A, Secretory/metabolism Indicator Dilution Techniques Infant Infant, Newborn Linear Models Lung Diseases/metabolism Proteins/metabolism Respiration, Artificial Sphingomyelins/metabolism Suction/methods Urea/metabolism
Chemicals
Albumins Biomarkers Immunoglobulin A, Secretory Proteins Sphingomyelins Urea
Authors & Affiliations
4 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Dargaville P A
Department of Neonatology, University Department of Paediatrics, and Department of Biochemistry, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. [email protected]
South M
Vervaart P
McDougall P N
Article Info
Journal
American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine
Abbr.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
ISSN
1073-449X
Published
1999-09-00
Pages
778-84
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
9421642
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]