Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 10486008 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

The rooting of the universal tree of life is not reliable.

Journal of molecular evolution ·Vol. 49 ·No. 4 ·1999-10-00 ·Pages 509-23

Philippe H, Forterre P

Abstract

Several composite universal trees connected by an ancestral gene duplication have been used to root the universal tree of life. In all cases, this root turned out to be in the eubacterial branch. However, the validity of results obtained from comparative sequence analysis has recently been questioned, in particular, in the case of ancient phylogenies. For example, it has been shown that several eukaryotic groups are misplaced in ribosomal RNA or elongation factor trees because of unequal rates of evolution and mutational saturation. Furthermore, the addition of new sequences to data sets has often turned apparently reasonable phylogenies into confused ones. We have thus revisited all composite protein trees that have been used to root the universal tree of life up to now (elongation factors, ATPases, tRNA synthetases, carbamoyl phosphate synthetases, signal recognition particle proteins) with updated data sets. In general, the two prokaryotic domains were not monophyletic with several aberrant groupings at different levels of the tree. Furthermore, the respective phylogenies contradicted each others, so that various ad hoc scenarios (paralogy or lateral gene transfer) must be proposed in order to obtain the traditional Archaebacteria-Eukaryota sisterhood. More importantly, all of the markers are heavily saturated with respect to amino acid substitutions. As phylogenies inferred from saturated data sets are extremely sensitive to differences in evolutionary rates, present phylogenies used to root the universal tree of life could be biased by the phenomenon of long branch attraction. Since the eubacterial branch was always the longest one, the eubacterial rooting could be explained by an attraction between this branch and the long branch of the outgroup. Finally, we suggested that an eukaryotic rooting could be a more fruitful working hypothesis, as it provides, for example, a simple explanation to the high genetic similarity of Archaebacteria and Eubacteria inferred from complete genome analysis.

MeSH Terms
Adenosine Triphosphatases/genetics Animals Archaea/genetics Bacteria/genetics Carbamoyl-Phosphate Synthase (Glutamine-Hydrolyzing)/genetics Databases, Factual Eubacterium/genetics Evolution, Molecular Gene Duplication Humans Phylogeny
Chemicals
Adenosine Triphosphatases Carbamoyl-Phosphate Synthase (Glutamine-Hydrolyzing)
Authors & Affiliations
2 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Philippe H
Phylogénie et Evolution Moléculaires (UPRESA 8080 CNRS), Bâtiment 444, Université Paris-Sud, 91405 Orsay-Cedex, France. [email protected]
Forterre P
Article Info
Journal
Journal of molecular evolution
Abbr.
J Mol Evol
ISSN
0022-2844
Published
1999-10-00
Pages
509-23
Language
English
Region
Germany
NLM ID
0360051
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]