Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 11716792 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Validation Study

The validity of self-reported weight in US adults: a population based cross-sectional study.

BMC public health ·Vol. 1 ·2001-00-00 ·Pages 11

Villanueva EV

Abstract

Investigating the validity of the self-reported values of weight allows for the proper assessment of studies using questionnaire-derived data. The study examined the accuracy of gender-specific self-reported weight in a sample of adults. The effects of age, education, race and ethnicity, income, general health and medical status on the degree of discrepancy (the difference between self-reported weight and measured weight) are similarly considered. The analysis used data from the US Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Self-reported and measured weights were abstracted and analyzed according to sex, age, measured weight, self-reported weight, and body mass index (BMI). A proportional odds model was applied. The weight discrepancy was positively associated with age, and negatively associated with measured weight and BMI. Ordered logistic regression modeling showed age, race-ethnicity, education, and BMI to be associated with the degree of discrepancy in both sexes. In men, additional predictors were consumption of more than 100 cigarettes and the desire to change weight. In women, marital status, income, activity level, and the number of months since the last doctor's visit were important. Predictors of the degree of weight discrepancy are gender-specific, and require careful consideration when examined.

MeSH Terms
Adult Age Factors Bias Body Mass Index Body Weight/ethnology Female Health Status Humans Income/statistics & numerical data Logistic Models Male Nutrition Surveys Self Concept Sex Factors Surveys and Questionnaires United States
Authors & Affiliations
1 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Villanueva E V
Centre for Clinical Effectiveness, Monash Institute of Health Services Research, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
References (19)
19 references, click to expand
  1. Accuracy of the estimated prevalence of obesity from self reported height and weight in an adult Scottish population.
    J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000 Feb;54(2):143-8 PMID: 10715748
  2. Self-reported versus measured weight and height in an older adult meal program population.
    J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1998 Nov;53(6):M481-3 PMID: 9823753
  3. Height, weight, and body mass index of elderly persons in Taiwan.
    J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000 Nov;55(11):M684-90 PMID: 11078099
  4. Effects of age on validity of self-reported height, weight, and body mass index: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994.
    J Am Diet Assoc. 2001 Jan;101(1):28-34; quiz 35-6 PMID: 11209581
  5. The accuracy of self-reported weights.
    Am J Clin Nutr. 1981 Aug;34(8):1593-9 PMID: 7270483
  6. Comparison of self-reported and measured height and weight.
    Am J Epidemiol. 1982 Feb;115(2):223-30 PMID: 7058781
  7. Underestimation of relative weight by use of self-reported height and weight.
    Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Jan;125(1):122-6 PMID: 3788941
  8. Accuracy of self-reported body weight compared to measured body weight. A population survey.
    Scand J Soc Med. 1987;15(3):191-8 PMID: 3616534
  9. The predictive validity of body mass index based on self-reported weight and height.
    Int J Obes. 1989;13(4):441-53 PMID: 2793299
  10. Relationship between questionnaire data and medical records of height, weight and body mass index.
    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1992 Jan;16(1):1-9 PMID: 1314237
  11. Sample design: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
    Vital Health Stat 2. 1992 Sep;(113):1-35 PMID: 1413563
  12. Self-reported height and weight and prevalence of obesity. Study in a Spanish population.
    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1993 Nov;17(11):663-7 PMID: 8281225
  13. Plan and operation of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-94. Series 1: programs and collection procedures.
    Vital Health Stat 1. 1994 Jul;(32):1-407 PMID: 7975354
  14. Can self-reported data accurately describe the prevalence of overweight?
    Public Health. 1995 Jul;109(4):275-84 PMID: 7667492
  15. Bias in reported body weight as a function of education, occupation, health and weight concern.
    Addict Behav. 1996 Mar-Apr;21(2):217-22 PMID: 8730524
  16. Socioeconomic differentials in misclassification of height, weight and body mass index based on questionnaire data.
    Int J Epidemiol. 1997 Aug;26(4):860-6 PMID: 9279620
  17. Prediction equations do not eliminate systematic error in self-reported body mass index.
    Obes Res. 1997 Jul;5(4):308-14 PMID: 9285836
  18. Use of self-report to monitor overweight and obesity in populations: some issues for consideration.
    Aust N Z J Public Health. 2000 Feb;24(1):96-9 PMID: 10777989
  19. Validity of self-reported weight and height in the French GAZEL cohort.
    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000 Sep;24(9):1111-8 PMID: 11033979
Article Info
Journal
BMC public health
Abbr.
BMC Public Health
ISSN
1471-2458
Published
2001-00-00
Epub
2001-00-06
Pages
11
Language
English
Region
England
NLM ID
100968562
PMCID
PMC59896
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]