Abstract
While a number of countries have reported rising preterm birth rates over the past two decades, none has examined the effects of socioeconomic status on preterm birth at a national level. To document the changing incidence of preterm birth in New Zealand over the past 20 years and to determine whether particular socioeconomic or ethnic subsections of the population have contributed disproportionately to the changes seen. Birth registration data routinely available from the New Zealand Health Information Service were analysed for the period 1980-99. Information for a total of 1 079 478 singleton live births was linked by Domicile Code to the New Zealand Deprivation Index, a small area index of deprivation. Singleton preterm birth rates rose by 37.2% during the 20 year period, from 4.3% in 1980 to 5.9% in 1999. Rates increased by 71.9% among those living in the most affluent areas, but by only 3.5% among those living in the most deprived areas, resulting in the disappearance of a socioeconomic gradient in preterm birth that had existed during the early 1980s. This study challenges traditional thinking on the associations between socioeconomic status and preterm birth. Further research is necessary if the changes that have occurred in New Zealand over the past 20 years are to be fully understood.
MeSH Terms
Adult
Female
Gestational Age
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Premature
Multivariate Analysis
New Zealand/epidemiology
Obstetric Labor, Premature/epidemiology,ethnology
Pregnancy
Regression Analysis
Risk Factors
Socioeconomic Factors
Authors & Affiliations
3 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Thompson J M D
Mitchell E A
References (12)
12 references, click to expand
-
Current concepts on the pathogenesis and markers of preterm births.
Clin Perinatol. 2000 Jun;27(2):263-83
PMID: 10863650
-
Socio-economic disparities in pregnancy outcome: why do the poor fare so poorly?
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2000 Jul;14(3):194-210
PMID: 10949211
-
Occupational fatigue and preterm premature rupture of membranes. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Units Network.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Feb;184(3):438-46
PMID: 11228500
-
Prematurity and occupational activity during pregnancy.
Am J Epidemiol. 1984 Mar;119(3):309-22
PMID: 6702809
-
Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis.
Bull World Health Organ. 1987;65(5):663-737
PMID: 3322602
-
Secular trends in preterm birth: a hospital-based cohort study.
JAMA. 1998 Dec 2;280(21):1849-54
PMID: 9846780
-
Antenatal ultrasonography in Dunedin: one year's data.
N Z Med J. 1991 Mar 27;104(908):117-9
PMID: 2011293
-
Low birthweight, preterm, and small for gestational age babies in Scotland, 1981-1984.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1991 Sep;45(3):207-10
PMID: 1757762
-
Did preterm deliveries continue to decrease in France in the 1980s?
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1995 Jul;9(3):296-306
PMID: 7479278
-
How important is social class a factor in preterm birth?
Lancet. 1997 Apr 12;349(9058):1040-1
PMID: 9107238
-
Determinants of preterm birth rates in Canada from 1981 through 1983 and from 1992 through 1994.
N Engl J Med. 1998 Nov 12;339(20):1434-9
PMID: 9811918
-
Routine antenatal ultrasound: a retrospective audit.
N Z Med J. 1987 May 13;100(823):284-6
PMID: 3332039