Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 12035030 Published · ppublish English Evaluation Study Journal Article

Main pancreatic ductal anatomy can direct choice of modality for treating pancreatic pseudocysts (surgery versus percutaneous drainage).

Annals of surgery ·Vol. 235 ·No. 6 ·2002-06-00 ·Pages 751-8

Nealon WH, Walser E

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that pancreatic ductal anatomy may predict the likely success of percutaneous drainage of pseudocysts of the pancreas. Various modalities are currently applied to pseudocysts, with little or no data to aid in the choice of management strategy. Pancreatic ductal anatomy was assessed and a system to categorize ductal changes was established. Patients with a diagnosis of pancreatic pseudocyst were evaluated from 1985 to 2000. Two hundred fifty-three patients have been included in this series. Pancreatic ductal anatomy was defined using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and categorized as a normal duct, a stricture, or complete cut-off of the pancreatic duct. Communication between the duct and cyst was noted. Among the 253 patients, 68 (27%) had spontaneous resolution. Fifty of the remaining 185 had percutaneous drainage and 148 (13 of whom failed to respond to percutaneous drainage) had surgery. There were no deaths in either group. Mean length of time with catheter drainage among all percutaneous drainage patients was 79.2 +/- 19.6 days. Patients with normal pancreatic ducts and those with strictures but no communication between the duct and the cyst who had percutaneous drainage had a much shorter length of hospital stay (6.1 +/- 4.6 days) than patients with strictures and duct-cyst communication and patients with complete cut-off of the duct (33.5 +/- 5.2 days and 39.1 +/- 7.9 days, respectively). Length of drainage also correlated with ductal anatomy. All patients with chronic pancreatitis failed to respond to percutaneous drainage. Pancreatic ductal anatomy provides a clear correlation with the failure and successes of pseudocysts managed by percutaneous drainage as well as predicting the total length of drainage. Percutaneous drainage is best applied to patients with normal ducts and is acceptably applied to patients with stricture but no cyst-duct communication.

MeSH Terms
Acute Disease Adult Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde Chronic Disease Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects,methods Drainage/adverse effects,methods Female Humans Length of Stay Male Middle Aged Pancreatic Ducts/anatomy & histology,diagnostic imaging Pancreatic Pseudocyst/classification,diagnostic imaging,etiology,surgery Pancreatitis/complications Tomography, X-Ray Computed Treatment Outcome
Authors & Affiliations
2 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Nealon William H
Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 77555-0544, USA. [email protected]
Walser Eric
References (16)
16 references, click to expand
  1. Modern management of pancreatic pseudocysts.
    Br J Surg. 1993 May;80(5):573-81 PMID: 8518891
  2. Long term results of percutaneous catheter drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992 Oct;175(4):293-8 PMID: 1411884
  3. Percutaneous catheter drainage compared with internal drainage in the management of pancreatic pseudocyst.
    Ann Surg. 1992 Jun;215(6):571-6; discussion 576-8 PMID: 1632678
  4. Selected management of pancreatic pseudocysts: operative versus expectant management.
    Surgery. 1992 Feb;111(2):123-30 PMID: 1736380
  5. Percutaneous drainage of infected and noninfected pancreatic pseudocysts: experience in 101 cases.
    Radiology. 1989 Mar;170(3 Pt 1):757-61 PMID: 2644662
  6. Pancreatic pseudocysts: a proposed classification and its management implications.
    Br J Surg. 1991 Aug;78(8):981-4 PMID: 1913122
  7. An endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-based algorithm for the management of pancreatic pseudocysts.
    Am J Surg. 1992 Jan;163(1):111-5; discussion 115-6 PMID: 1733357
  8. Management of pancreatic pseudocysts.
    J Am Coll Surg. 1998 May;186(5):507-11 PMID: 9583690
  9. Pseudocysts.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 1999 Mar;49(3 Pt 2):S81-4 PMID: 10049456
  10. Percutaneous drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts is associated with a higher failure rate than surgical treatment in unselected patients.
    Ann Surg. 1999 Jun;229(6):781-7; discussion 787-9 PMID: 10363891
  11. Pancreatic pseudocysts. When and how should drainage be performed?
    Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1999 Sep;28(3):615-39 PMID: 10503140
  12. The natural history of pancreatic pseudocysts documented by computed tomography.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990 May;170(5):411-7 PMID: 2326721
  13. Endoscopic transpapillary therapy for disrupted pancreatic duct and peripancreatic fluid collections.
    Gastroenterology. 1991 May;100(5 Pt 1):1362-70 PMID: 2013381
  14. The natural history of pancreatic pseudocysts: a unified concept of management.
    Am J Surg. 1979 Jan;137(1):135-41 PMID: 758840
  15. Preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with pancreatic pseudocyst associated with resolving acute and chronic pancreatitis.
    Ann Surg. 1989 May;209(5):532-8; discussion 538-40 PMID: 2705818
  16. Endosonographic-guided therapy of pancreatic pseudocysts.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Dec;52(6 Suppl):S23-7 PMID: 11115944
Article Info
Journal
Annals of surgery
Abbr.
Ann Surg
ISSN
0003-4932
Published
2002-06-00
Pages
751-8
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
0372354
PMCID
PMC1422503
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]