Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 12826744 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Validation Study

The validity and reliability of 6 sets of clinical criteria to classify Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia in cases confirmed post-mortem: added value of a decision tree approach.

Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders ·Vol. 16 ·No. 3 ·2003-00-00 ·Pages 170-80

Hogervorst E, Bandelow S, Combrinck M, Irani SR, Irani S, Smith AD

Abstract

Data from 204 participants from the Oxford Project to Investigate Memory and Ageing, who were diagnosed post-mortem using the histopathological criteria of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD), were used to assess the validity of the clinical criteria for Alzheimer's disease (AD) of the 'National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke/the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association' (NINCDS/ADRDA). Cases who had been diagnosed as NINCDS/ADRDA 'probable AD' in life were usually confirmed at autopsy, but half of the NINCDS/ADRDA 'negative' cases were not (low specificity). It was hypothesized that the overall clinical impression may have taken precedence over the use of the actual criteria. We therefore investigated the validity and reliability of the clinical criteria using a computerized 'dementia diagnosis system' for each of 6 sets of criteria [Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV), NINCDS/ADRDA and three sets of criteria specifically for vascular dementia (VaD): NINCDS-AIREN, State of California Alzheimer's Disease Diagnostic and Treatment Centers (ADDTC), and Vascular Cognitive Impairment (VCI)] to classify a subset (n = 96) of the cases confirmed post-mortem. The use of the computerized system significantly (p = 0.01) increased the specificity (81%, similar to sensitivity) of the NINCDS/ADRDA diagnoses, which were shown to have 'moderate' inter-rater reliability. The DSM-IV criteria had good validity for AD when compared with post-mortem confirmation and showed 'substantial' inter-rater reliability. The ADDTC and VCI criteria for VaD had good specificity (88%) and sensitivity (75%), but only for one rater. The DSM-IV and NINCDS-AIREN criteria for VaD showed poor validity and inter-rater reliability. We conclude that the forced use of decision trees through a computerized system enhances the accuracy of the clinical diagnoses of dementia.

MeSH Terms
Aged Aged, 80 and over Alzheimer Disease/diagnosis Cadaver Cohort Studies Decision Trees Dementia, Vascular/diagnosis Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted/standards Diagnosis, Differential Diagnostic Errors Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Female Humans Longitudinal Studies Male Middle Aged National Institutes of Health (U.S.) Predictive Value of Tests Reproducibility of Results United States
Authors & Affiliations
6 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Hogervorst E
Department of Pharmacology, Oxford Project to Investigate Memory and Ageing, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. [email protected]
Bandelow S
Combrinck M
Irani S R
Irani S
Smith A D
Article Info
Journal
Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders
Abbr.
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord
ISSN
1420-8008
Published
2003-00-00
Pages
170-80
Language
English
Region
Switzerland
NLM ID
9705200
Subset
IM
Corrections
ErratumIn
-
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]