Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 12971614 Published · ppublish English Comparative Study Evaluation Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. Validation Study

Comparison of in vitro velocity measurements in a scaled total cavopulmonary connection with computational predictions.

Annals of biomedical engineering ·Vol. 31 ·No. 7 ·2003-00-00 ·页码 810-22

Khunatorn Y, Shandas R, DeGroff C, Mahalingam S

Abstract

Minimizing pressure drop through the total cavopulmonary surgical connection (TCPC), where the superior and inferior vena cavae (SVC), (IVC) are connected directly to the right and left pulmonary arteries, is an important clinical consideration. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models have been used to examine the impact of connection configuration on TCPC pressure drop. However, few studies have validated CFD results with experimental data. This study compares flow field measurements on two different TCPC models at varying SVC:IVC flow rate ratios using CFD and digital particle image velocimetry (DPIV). Although the primary flow fields generated by CFD and DPIV methods were similar for the majority of flow conditions, three key differences were found: (1) the CFD model did not reproduce the 3D complexity of flow interactions in the no-offset model with 50:50 flow ratio; (2) in vitro results showed consistently higher secondary flow components within the pulmonary artery segments, especially for the no-offset model; (3) recirculation areas for the 1/2 diameter offset model were consistently higher for in vitro versus CFD results. We conclude that this numerical model is a reasonable means of studying TCPC flow, although modifications need to be addressed to ensure that numerical results reproduce secondary flow characteristics.

MeSH 主题词
Blood Flow Velocity/physiology Blood Pressure/physiology Computer Simulation Heart Bypass, Right/methods Hemorheology/methods Humans Models, Cardiovascular Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted Pulmonary Artery/physiopathology,surgery Reproducibility of Results Rheology/methods Sensitivity and Specificity Vena Cava, Inferior/physiopathology,surgery Vena Cava, Superior/physiopathology,surgery
作者与单位
共 4 位作者,点击展开单位 / ORCID
Khunatorn Yottana
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand 50202.
Shandas Robin
DeGroff Curt
Mahalingam Shankar
Article Info
Journal
Annals of biomedical engineering
Abbr.
Ann Biomed Eng
ISSN
0090-6964
Published
2003-00-00
页码
810-22
Language
English
Country/Region
United States
NLM ID
0361512
基金资助
NHLBI NIH HHS · HL-67393 · United States
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]