Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 1333485 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Comparison of ViraPap, Southern hybridization, and polymerase chain reaction methods for human papillomavirus identification in an epidemiological investigation of cervical cancer.

Journal of clinical microbiology ·Vol. 30 ·No. 11 ·1992-11-00 ·Pages 2951-9

Guerrero E, Daniel RW, Bosch FX, Castellsagué X, Muñoz N, Gili M, Viladiu P, Navarro C, Zubiri ML, Ascunce N

Abstract

In order to provide a reliable diagnosis for the presence and type of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in a case-control study of cervical cancer in Colombia and Spain, 926 cervical scrapes from female subjects were examined by ViraPap (VP) and Southern hybridization (SH), and 510 of these (263 cases and 247 controls) were also tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the HPV L1 consensus primers. HPV DNA prevalence was much higher in cases than in controls by each of the three tests. There was complete agreement between the results of the three tests for 64.9% of the 510 specimens; 53.5% were negative and 11.4% were positive (regardless of type) by all tests. An additional 29.0% of the specimens were positive by PCR: 19.4% by PCR alone, 6.7% by PCR and VP, and 2.9% by PCR and SH. SH and/or VP gave positive results for 6.0% of the specimens for which the PCR finding was negative: 2.7% by SH alone, 2.5% by VP alone, and 0.8% by both VP and SH. When specimens which were positive by VP alone or only by SH at low-stringency conditions were excluded, PCR confirmed all but four specimens which were positive by other tests. The concordance between type-specific diagnosis by SH and PCR was 86% when HPVs were typed in both tests. HPV-16 accounted for over 80% of the typed HPVs in each test. The presence of blood in case specimens did not appear to inhibit HPV positivity by VP or by PCR at the dilution tested. Low amounts of cellular DNA of specimens resulted in some underestimation of HPV positivity by VP and SH but not by PCR. Compared with that of PCR, the sensitivities for case specimens were 38% by SH and 50% by VP; the sensitivity for control specimens, although it could not be measured precisely because there were few positive specimens, appeared to be lower than for case specimens. It was concluded that PCR-based tests are best suited for epidemiological investigation of HPVs.

MeSH Terms
Adult Blotting, Southern Case-Control Studies Colombia/epidemiology DNA, Viral/genetics,isolation & purification Evaluation Studies as Topic Female Humans Middle Aged Nucleic Acid Hybridization Papillomaviridae/genetics,isolation & purification Polymerase Chain Reaction Sensitivity and Specificity Spain/epidemiology Tumor Virus Infections/diagnosis,epidemiology,microbiology Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology,microbiology Virology/methods,statistics & numerical data
Chemicals
DNA, Viral
Authors & Affiliations
10 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Guerrero E
Abbott Cientifica S.A., Madrid, Spain.
Daniel R W
Bosch F X
Castellsagué X
Muñoz N
Gili M
Viladiu P
Navarro C
Zubiri M L
Ascunce N
References (19)
19 references, click to expand
  1. General primer-mediated polymerase chain reaction permits the detection of sequenced and still unsequenced human papillomavirus genotypes in cervical scrapes and carcinomas.
    Int J Cancer. 1990 Apr 15;45(4):644-9 PMID: 2157674
  2. Comparative analysis of human papillomavirus detection by polymerase chain reaction and Virapap/Viratype kits.
    Am J Clin Pathol. 1990 Nov;94(5):554-60 PMID: 2173396
  3. Inter-laboratory variation as an explanation for varying prevalence estimates of human papillomavirus infection.
    Int J Cancer. 1989 Feb 15;43(2):260-2 PMID: 2537262
  4. Avoiding false positives with PCR.
    Nature. 1989 May 18;339(6221):237-8 PMID: 2716852
  5. Epidemiology of genital human papillomavirus infection.
    Epidemiol Rev. 1988;10:122-63 PMID: 2852116
  6. Human papillomaviruses in the pathogenesis of anogenital cancer.
    Virology. 1991 Sep;184(1):9-13 PMID: 1651607
  7. The sexually transmitted disease model for cervical cancer: incoherent epidemiologic findings and the role of misclassification of human papillomavirus infection.
    Epidemiology. 1991 Mar;2(2):98-106 PMID: 1657209
  8. Analysis of the physical state of different human papillomavirus DNAs in intraepithelial and invasive cervical neoplasm.
    J Virol. 1991 Feb;65(2):606-12 PMID: 1846186
  9. Human papillomavirus infection and other risk factors for cervical neoplasia: a case-control study.
    Int J Cancer. 1991 Aug 19;49(1):6-13 PMID: 1874571
  10. Uric acid as an inhibitor of cyclophosphamide-induced micronuclei in mice.
    Mutat Res. 1991 Feb;262(2):115-8 PMID: 2000096
  11. Detection and typing of human papillomavirus in archival cervical cancer specimens by DNA amplification with consensus primers.
    J Natl Cancer Inst. 1990 Sep 19;82(18):1477-84 PMID: 2167986
  12. Comparison of Southern transfer hybridization and dot filter hybridization for detection of cervical human papillomavirus infection with types 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, and 35.
    Am J Clin Pathol. 1990 Nov;94(5):561-5 PMID: 2173397
  13. Human papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer in Latin America.
    N Engl J Med. 1989 Jun 1;320(22):1437-41 PMID: 2541336
  14. Amplification of human papillomavirus DNA sequences by using conserved primers.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Dec;27(12):2660-5 PMID: 2556429
  15. Does human papillomavirus cause cervical cancer? The state of the epidemiological evidence.
    Br J Cancer. 1988 Jan;57(1):1-5 PMID: 2831924
  16. Identification of human papillomavirus in cervical swabs by deoxyribonucleic acid in situ hybridization.
    Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Dec;64(6):767-72 PMID: 6095155
  17. Comparison of Southern blot hybridization and polymerase chain reaction methods for the detection of human papillomavirus DNA.
    J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Mar;29(3):573-7 PMID: 1645370
  18. Genital human papillomavirus infection in female university students as determined by a PCR-based method.
    JAMA. 1991 Jan 23-30;265(4):472-7 PMID: 1845912
  19. A direct comparison of methods proposed for use in widespread screening of human papillomavirus infections.
    Mol Cell Probes. 1991 Feb;5(1):65-72 PMID: 1850116
Article Info
Journal
Journal of clinical microbiology
Abbr.
J Clin Microbiol
ISSN
0095-1137
Published
1992-11-00
Pages
2951-9
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
7505564
PMCID
PMC270559
Subset
IM
Grants
NIAID NIH HHS · P01 AI16959 · United States
NCI NIH HHS · R03 CA52543 · United States
Corrections
CommentIn
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]