Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 14645889 Published · ppublish English Journal Article

The measurement of active errors: methodological issues.

Quality & safety in health care ·Vol. 12 Suppl 2 ·2003-12-00 ·Pages ii8-12

Lilford RJ, Mohammed MA, Braunholtz D, Hofer TP

Abstract

The value of research in any topic area turns on its validity. Patient safety research has revealed--or, at least, given renewed urgency to--a raft of methodological issues. The meaning and thus the value of empirical research in this field is contingent on getting the methodology right. The need for good methods for the measurement of error is necessary whenever an inference is intended and, since inferences lie at the heart of research and management, there is a huge need to understand better how to make measurements that are meaningful, precise, and accurate. In this paper we consider issues relating to the measurement of error and the need for more research.

MeSH Terms
Empirical Research Health Services Research/methods Humans Medical Errors/statistics & numerical data Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data Sensitivity and Specificity United Kingdom/epidemiology
Authors & Affiliations
4 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Lilford R J
Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. [email protected]
Mohammed M A
Braunholtz D
Hofer T P
References (20)
20 references, click to expand
  1. Discussion between reviewers does not improve reliability of peer review of hospital quality.
    Med Care. 2000 Feb;38(2):152-61 PMID: 10659689
  2. An evaluation of adverse incident reporting.
    J Eval Clin Pract. 1999 Feb;5(1):5-12 PMID: 10468379
  3. What is an error?
    Eff Clin Pract. 2000 Nov-Dec;3(6):261-9 PMID: 11151522
  4. What is a prescribing error?
    Qual Health Care. 2000 Dec;9(4):232-7 PMID: 11101708
  5. Estimating hospital deaths due to medical errors: preventability is in the eye of the reviewer.
    JAMA. 2001 Jul 25;286(4):415-20 PMID: 11466119
  6. Process versus outcome indicators in the assessment of quality of health care.
    Int J Qual Health Care. 2001 Dec;13(6):475-80 PMID: 11769750
  7. The reliability of medical record review for estimating adverse event rates.
    Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jun 4;136(11):812-6 PMID: 12044129
  8. The Leeds University Maternity Audit Project.
    Int J Qual Health Care. 2002 Jun;14(3):175-81 PMID: 12108528
  9. Validation and application of an instrument for measuring patient relatives' perception of quality of geriatric care.
    Int J Qual Health Care. 2003 Jun;15(3):197-206 PMID: 12803347
  10. Using standardized patients to measure professional performance of physicians.
    Int J Qual Health Care. 2003 Jun;15(3):251-9 PMID: 12803353
  11. Quality-of-care assessment: choosing a method for peer review.
    N Engl J Med. 1973 Jun 21;288(25):1323-9 PMID: 4706275
  12. Reliability and validity of judgments concerning adverse events suffered by hospitalized patients.
    Med Care. 1989 Dec;27(12):1148-58 PMID: 2593729
  13. Explaining variations in hospital death rates. Randomness, severity of illness, quality of care.
    JAMA. 1990 Jul 25;264(4):484-90 PMID: 2195173
  14. Changes in quality of care for five diseases measured by implicit review, 1981 to 1986.
    JAMA. 1990 Oct 17;264(15):1974-9 PMID: 2214062
  15. The reliability of peer assessments of quality of care.
    JAMA. 1992 Feb 19;267(7):958-60 PMID: 1734109
  16. A continuous quality improvement approach to medication administration.
    J Nurs Care Qual. 1993 Apr;7(3):28-34 PMID: 8457700
  17. A look into the nature and causes of human errors in the intensive care unit.
    Crit Care Med. 1995 Feb;23(2):294-300 PMID: 7867355
  18. Detecting differences in quality of care: the sensitivity of measures of process and outcome in treating acute myocardial infarction.
    BMJ. 1995 Sep 23;311(7008):793-6 PMID: 7580444
  19. Identifying poor-quality hospitals with mortality rates. Often there's more noise than signal.
    Med Care. 1996 Aug;34(8):735-6 PMID: 8709655
  20. Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality.
    JAMA. 2000 Apr 5;283(13):1715-22 PMID: 10755498
Article Info
Journal
Quality & safety in health care
Abbr.
Qual Saf Health Care
ISSN
1475-3898
Published
2003-12-00
Pages
ii8-12
Language
English
Region
England
NLM ID
101136980
PMCID
PMC1765778
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]