Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 14960522 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

The Department of Health's "two week standard" for bowel cancer: is it working?

Gut ·Vol. 53 ·No. 3 ·2004-03-00 ·Pages 387-91

Flashman K, O'Leary DP, Senapati A, Thompson MR

Abstract

To determine the effectiveness and efficiency of the Department of Health's new general practitioner referral guidelines for bowel cancer. One year prospective audit. District general hospital serving a population of 550 000. All patients with bowel cancer; all patients referred on the basis of the two week standard and to a routine colorectal surgical outpatient clinic. Proportion of cancers referred on the basis of the two week standard and to other colorectal clinics; the proportion with the higher risk criteria and their diagnostic yields; stage of cancers diagnosed in outpatient clinics; and time to treatment. A total of 249 cancers were diagnosed in the index year. Sixty five (26.1%) were referred to two week standard clinics, 40 (16.1%) to routine colorectal surgical outpatient clinics, 54 (22%) to other clinics, and 88 (35.3%) were emergencies. Thirteen patients per week were referred to the two week standard clinics and 85% (54/65) of cancers so referred were seen within two weeks. The diagnostic yield of cancer in the two week standard clinic was 9.4% (65/695) compared with 2.2% (40/1815) in the routine colorectal surgical outpatient clinic (p<0.0001). Eighty five per cent of patients with cancer referred to outpatients matched the guidelines for the two week standard clinics. Only 46% of this group were so referred. Overall, delay to treatment and Dukes' stage were not improved in patients diagnosed in the two week standard clinics. Most patients with bowel cancer were not referred on the basis of the two week standard although most fulfilled the referral criteria, which had higher diagnostic yields. The two week standard clinics did not shorten the overall time to treatment or improve the stage of disease because the time lags before referral and after the outpatient appointment are the major causes of delay in the bowel cancer patient's journey.

MeSH Terms
Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over England Family Practice/standards Female Government Guideline Adherence Hospitals, District/statistics & numerical data Hospitals, General/standards Humans Intestinal Neoplasms/diagnosis,therapy Male Medical Audit Middle Aged Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/statistics & numerical data Practice Guidelines as Topic Referral and Consultation/standards,statistics & numerical data Risk Factors Time Factors
Authors & Affiliations
4 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Flashman K
Colorectal Unit, Surgical Department, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Cosham, Portsmouth, UK.
O'Leary D P
Senapati A
Thompson M R
References (12)
12 references, click to expand
  1. Preliminary evaluation of United Kingdom National Referral Guidelines for lower gastrointestinal tract cancer.
    Colorectal Dis. 2002 Mar;4(2):111-114 PMID: 12780632
  2. Randomised controlled trial of effect of feedback on general practitioners' prescribing in Australia.
    BMJ. 1999 Feb 20;318(7182):507-11 PMID: 10024260
  3. Is the two week rule for cancer referrals working?
    BMJ. 2001 Jun 30;322(7302):1555-6 PMID: 11431280
  4. ACPGBI Referral guidelines for colorectal cancer.
    Colorectal Dis. 2002 Jul;4(4):287-297 PMID: 12780604
  5. Effect of feedback on test ordering behaviour of general practitioners.
    BMJ. 1992 Apr 25;304(6834):1093-6 PMID: 1586825
  6. The effectiveness of new criteria for colorectal fast track clinics.
    Colorectal Dis. 2002 Mar;4(2):115-117 PMID: 12780633
  7. Does continuing medical education in general practice make a difference?
    BMJ. 1999 May 8;318(7193):1276-9 PMID: 10231265
  8. Referral guidelines for colorectal cancer--do they work?
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2003 Mar;85(2):107-10 PMID: 12648341
  9. The fourteen-day rule and colorectal cancer.
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002 Nov;84(6):386-8 PMID: 12484576
  10. A prospective study to assess the implementation of a fast-track system to meet the two-week target for colorectal cancer in Somerset.
    Colorectal Dis. 2002 Jan;4(1):28-30 PMID: 12780651
  11. Identifying and managing patients at low risk of bowel cancer in general practice.
    BMJ. 2003 Aug 2;327(7409):263-5 PMID: 12896939
  12. Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies.
    JAMA. 1995 Sep 6;274(9):700-5 PMID: 7650822
Article Info
Journal
Gut
Abbr.
Gut
ISSN
0017-5749
Published
2004-03-00
Pages
387-91
Language
English
Region
England
NLM ID
2985108R
PMCID
PMC1773951
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]