Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 15008412 Published · ppublish English Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Bayesian analysis suggests that most amino acid replacements in Drosophila are driven by positive selection.

Journal of molecular evolution ·Vol. 57 Suppl 1 ·2003-00-00 ·Pages S154-64

Sawyer SA, Kulathinal RJ, Bustamante CD, Hartl DL

Abstract

One of the principal goals of population genetics is to understand the processes by which genetic variation within species (polymorphism) becomes converted into genetic differences between species (divergence). In this transformation, selective neutrality, near neutrality, and positive selection may each play a role, differing from one gene to the next. Synonymous nucleotide sites are often used as a uniform standard of comparison across genes on the grounds that synonymous sites are subject to relatively weak selective constraints and so may, to a first approximation, be regarded as neutral. Synonymous sites are also interdigitated with nonsynonymous sites and so are affected equally by genomic context and demographic factors. Hence a comparison of levels of polymorphism and divergence between synonymous sites and amino acid replacement sites in a gene is potentially informative about the magnitude of selective forces associated with amino acid replacements. We have analyzed 56 genes in which polymorphism data from D. simulans are compared with divergence from a reference strain of D. melanogaster. The framework of the analysis is Bayesian and assumes that the distribution of selective effects (Malthusian fitnesses) is Gaussian with a mean that differs for each gene. In such a model, the average scaled selection intensity (gamma = N(e)s) of amino acid replacements eligible to become polymorphic or fixed is -7.31, and the standard deviation of selective effects within each locus is 6.79 (assuming homoscedasticity across loci). For newly arising mutations of this type that occur in autosomal or X-linked genes, the average proportion of beneficial mutations is 19.7%. Among the amino acid polymorphisms in the sample, the expected average proportion of beneficial mutations is 47.7%, and among amino acid replacements that become fixed the average proportion of beneficial mutations is 94.3%. The average scaled selection intensity of fixed mutations is +5.1. The presence of positive selection is pervasive with the single exception of kl-5, a Y-linked fertility gene. We find no evidence that a significant fraction of fixed amino acid replacements is neutral or nearly neutral or that positive selection drives amino acid replacements at only a subset of the loci. These results are model dependent and we discuss possible modifications of the model that might allow more neutral and nearly neutral amino acid replacements to be fixed.

MeSH Terms
Amino Acid Substitution Animals Bayes Theorem Drosophila/genetics Models, Genetic Mutation Polymorphism, Genetic Selection, Genetic X Chromosome Y Chromosome
Authors & Affiliations
4 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Sawyer Stanley A
Department of Mathematics, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.
Kulathinal Rob J
Bustamante Carlos D
Hartl Daniel L
References (31)
31 references, click to expand
  1. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.
    Genetics. 1989 Nov;123(3):585-95 PMID: 2513255
  2. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene.
    Genet Res. 1974 Feb;23(1):23-35 PMID: 4407212
  3. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations.
    Genetics. 1993 Mar;133(3):693-709 PMID: 8454210
  4. Testing the neutral theory of molecular evolution with genomic data from Drosophila.
    Nature. 2002 Feb 28;415(6875):1024-6 PMID: 11875569
  5. Adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila.
    Nature. 2002 Feb 28;415(6875):1022-4 PMID: 11875568
  6. Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA.
    Genetics. 1995 Feb;139(2):1067-76 PMID: 7713409
  7. Likelihood models for detecting positively selected amino acid sites and applications to the HIV-1 envelope gene.
    Genetics. 1998 Mar;148(3):929-36 PMID: 9539414
  8. Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila.
    Nature. 1991 Jun 20;351(6328):652-4 PMID: 1904993
  9. The cost of inbreeding in Arabidopsis.
    Nature. 2002 Apr 4;416(6880):531-4 PMID: 11932744
  10. A maximum likelihood method for analyzing pseudogene evolution: implications for silent site evolution in humans and rodents.
    Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Jan;19(1):110-7 PMID: 11752196
  11. Compensatory nearly neutral mutations: selection without adaptation.
    J Theor Biol. 1996 Oct 7;182(3):303-9 PMID: 8944162
  12. Population, evolutionary and genomic consequences of interference selection.
    Genetics. 2002 May;161(1):389-410 PMID: 12019253
  13. Detecting bottlenecks and selective sweeps from DNA sequence polymorphism.
    Genetics. 2000 Jun;155(2):981-7 PMID: 10835415
  14. Genetic drift in an infinite population. The pseudohitchhiking model.
    Genetics. 2000 Jun;155(2):909-19 PMID: 10835409
  15. Multi-locus selection and the structure of variation at the white gene of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Genetics. 1996 Oct;144(2):635-45 PMID: 8889526
  16. Population genetics of polymorphism and divergence.
    Genetics. 1992 Dec;132(4):1161-76 PMID: 1459433
  17. The sampling theory of selectively neutral alleles.
    Theor Popul Biol. 1972 Mar;3(1):87-112 PMID: 4667078
  18. Nested clade analyses of phylogeographic data: testing hypotheses about gene flow and population history.
    Mol Ecol. 1998 Apr;7(4):381-97 PMID: 9627999
  19. Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection.
    Genetics. 2000 Jul;155(3):1405-13 PMID: 10880498
  20. Out of Africa again and again.
    Nature. 2002 Mar 7;416(6876):45-51 PMID: 11882887
  21. Rapid fixation of deleterious alleles can be caused by Muller's ratchet.
    Genet Res. 1997 Aug;70(1):63-73 PMID: 9369098
  22. Likelihood ratio tests for detecting positive selection and application to primate lysozyme evolution.
    Mol Biol Evol. 1998 May;15(5):568-73 PMID: 9580986
  23. The rate of compensatory evolution.
    Genetics. 1996 Sep;144(1):419-26 PMID: 8878705
  24. A screen for fast evolving genes from Drosophila.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Sep 2;94(18):9746-50 PMID: 9275195
  25. Joint effects of genetic hitchhiking and background selection on neutral variation.
    Genetics. 2000 Jul;155(3):1415-27 PMID: 10880499
  26. Evidence for positive selection in the superoxide dismutase (Sod) region of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Genetics. 1994 Apr;136(4):1329-40 PMID: 8013910
  27. Genes in sweeping competition.
    Cell Mol Life Sci. 2001 Jan;58(1):125-34 PMID: 11229811
  28. The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Science. 2000 Mar 24;287(5461):2185-95 PMID: 10731132
  29. Selection intensity for codon bias.
    Genetics. 1994 Sep;138(1):227-34 PMID: 8001789
  30. The effects of subdivision on the genetic divergence of populations and species.
    Evolution. 2000 Aug;54(4):1092-101 PMID: 11005279
  31. Evolutionary EST analysis identifies rapidly evolving male reproductive proteins in Drosophila.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jun 19;98(13):7375-9 PMID: 11404480
Article Info
Journal
Journal of molecular evolution
Abbr.
J Mol Evol
ISSN
0022-2844
Published
2003-00-00
Pages
S154-64
Language
English
Region
Germany
NLM ID
0360051
Subset
IM
Grants
NIGMS NIH HHS · GM60035 · United States
NIGMS NIH HHS · GM65169 · United States
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]