Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 15651087 Published · ppublish English Comparative Study Journal Article

An application of propensity score matching using claims data.

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety ·Vol. 14 ·No. 7 ·2005-07-00 ·Pages 465-76

Seeger JD, Williams PL, Walker AM

Abstract

Confounding by indication is a common problem in pharmacoepidemiology, where predictors of treatment also have prognostic value for the outcome of interest. The tools available to the epidemiologist that can be used to mitigate the effects of confounding by indication often have limits with respect to the number of variables that can be simultaneously incorporated as components of the confounding. This constraint becomes particularly apparent in the context of a rich data source (such as administrative claims data), applied to the study of an outcome that occurs infrequently. In such settings, there will typically be many more variables available for control as potential confounders than traditional epidemiologic techniques will allow. One tool that can indirectly permit control of a large number of variables is the propensity score approach. This paper illustrates the application of the propensity score to a study conducted in an administrative database, and raises critical issues to be addressed in such an analysis. In this example, the effect of statin therapy on the occurrence of myocardial infarction was examined, and numerous potential confounders of this association were adjusted simultaneously using a propensity score to form matched cohorts of statin initiators and non-initiators. The incidence of myocardial infarction observed in the statin treated cohort was lower than the incidence in the untreated cohort, and the magnitude of this effect was consistent with results from randomized placebo controlled clinical trials of statin therapy. This example illustrates how confounding by indication can be mitigated by the propensity score matching technique. Concerns remain over the generalizability of estimates obtained from such a study, and how to know when propensity scores are removing bias, since apparent balance between compared groups on measured variables could leave variables not included in the propensity score unbalanced and lead to confounded effect estimates.

MeSH Terms
Cohort Studies Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic Data Collection/methods Humans Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use Hypercholesterolemia/drug therapy,epidemiology Incidence Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology,prevention & control Outcome Assessment, Health Care Pharmaceutical Services/statistics & numerical data Pharmacoepidemiology/methods Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Risk Factors Statistics as Topic
Chemicals
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
Authors & Affiliations
3 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Seeger John D
Ingenix Epidemiology, Auburndale, Massachusetts 02466, USA. [email protected]
Williams Paige L
Walker Alexander M
Article Info
Journal
Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety
Abbr.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf
ISSN
1053-8569
Published
2005-07-00
Pages
465-76
Language
English
Region
England
NLM ID
9208369
Subset
IM
Corrections
CommentIn
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]