Abstract
Very few analytical approaches have been reported to resolve the variability in microarray measurements stemming from sample heterogeneity. For example, tissue samples used in cancer studies are usually contaminated with the surrounding or infiltrating cell types. This heterogeneity in the sample preparation hinders further statistical analysis, significantly so if different samples contain different proportions of these cell types. Thus, sample heterogeneity can result in the identification of differentially expressed genes that may be unrelated to the biological question being studied. Similarly, irrelevant gene combinations can be discovered in the case of gene expression based classification. We propose a computational framework for removing the effects of sample heterogeneity by "microdissecting" microarray data in silico. The computational method provides estimates of the expression values of the pure (non-heterogeneous) cell samples. The inversion of the sample heterogeneity can be facilitated by providing accurate estimates of the mixing percentages of different cell types in each measurement. For those cases where no such information is available, we develop an optimization-based method for joint estimation of the mixing percentages and the expression values of the pure cell samples. We also consider the problem of selecting the correct number of cell types. The efficiency of the proposed methods is illustrated by applying them to a carefully controlled cDNA microarray data obtained from heterogeneous samples. The results demonstrate that the methods are capable of reconstructing both the sample and cell type specific expression values from heterogeneous mixtures and that the mixing percentages of different cell types can also be estimated. Furthermore, a general purpose model selection method can be used to select the correct number of cell types.
MeSH Terms
Algorithms
Cell Line, Tumor
Computational Biology/methods
Computer Simulation
DNA, Complementary/metabolism
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Gene Expression Profiling
Gene Expression Regulation
Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
Humans
Microdissection
Models, Genetic
Models, Statistical
Nucleic Acid Hybridization
Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted
Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis/methods
Pattern Recognition, Automated
Protein Interaction Mapping
Reproducibility of Results
Research Design
Sample Size
Sequence Analysis, DNA
Software
Time Factors
Chemicals
DNA, Complementary
Authors & Affiliations
5 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Lähdesmäki Harri
Institute of Signal Processing, Tampere University of Technology, P.O.Box 553, 33101 Tampere, Finland.
[email protected]
Shmulevich Llya
Dunmire Valerie
Yli-Harja Olli
Zhang Wei
References (19)
19 references, click to expand
-
Expression deconvolution: a reinterpretation of DNA microarray data reveals dynamic changes in cell populations.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Sep 2;100(18):10370-5
PMID: 12934019
-
Data extraction from composite oligonucleotide microarrays.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Apr 1;31(7):e36
PMID: 12655024
-
In silico dissection of cell-type-associated patterns of gene expression in prostate cancer.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jan 13;101(2):615-20
PMID: 14722351
-
Differential gene and protein expression in primary breast malignancies and their lymph node metastases as revealed by combined cDNA microarray and tissue microarray analysis.
Cancer. 2004 Mar 15;100(6):1110-22
PMID: 15022276
-
Variance-stabilizing transformations for two-color microarrays.
Bioinformatics. 2004 Mar 22;20(5):660-7
PMID: 15033873
-
Deconvolving cell cycle expression data with complementary information.
Bioinformatics. 2004 Aug 4;20 Suppl 1:i23-30
PMID: 15262777
-
Mixture models for assessing differential expression in complex tissues using microarray data.
Bioinformatics. 2004 Jul 22;20(11):1663-9
PMID: 14988124
-
Laser capture microdissection.
Science. 1996 Nov 8;274(5289):998-1001
PMID: 8875945
-
Comprehensive identification of cell cycle-regulated genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by microarray hybridization.
Mol Biol Cell. 1998 Dec;9(12):3273-97
PMID: 9843569
-
Reactivation of insulin-like growth factor binding protein 2 expression in glioblastoma multiforme: a revelation by parallel gene expression profiling.
Cancer Res. 1999 Sep 1;59(17):4228-32
PMID: 10485462
-
Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring.
Science. 1999 Oct 15;286(5439):531-7
PMID: 10521349
-
Tissue classification with gene expression profiles.
J Comput Biol. 2000;7(3-4):559-83
PMID: 11108479
-
Separation of samples into their constituents using gene expression data.
Bioinformatics. 2001;17 Suppl 1:S279-87
PMID: 11473019
-
Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer.
Nature. 2002 Jan 31;415(6871):530-6
PMID: 11823860
-
Tumor specific gene expression profiles in human leiomyosarcoma: an evaluation of intratumor heterogeneity.
Cancer. 2002 Apr 1;94(7):2069-75
PMID: 11932911
-
Variance stabilization applied to microarray data calibration and to the quantification of differential expression.
Bioinformatics. 2002;18 Suppl 1:S96-104
PMID: 12169536
-
Microarray data normalization and transformation.
Nat Genet. 2002 Dec;32 Suppl:496-501
PMID: 12454644
-
Error-correcting microarray design.
Genomics. 2003 Feb;81(2):157-65
PMID: 12620393
-
Apoptotic response to 5-fluorouracil treatment is mediated by reduced polyamines, non-autocrine Fas ligand and induced tumor necrosis factor receptor 2.
Cancer Biol Ther. 2003 Sep-Oct;2(5):572-8
PMID: 14614330