Abstract
The French pharmacovigilance system is based on a network of 31 regional centres located in teaching hospitals and coordinated by the French Medicines Agency ("Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire des Produits de Santé" [Afssaps]). Since 1984, they have shared a common database of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) that are spontaneously reported by healthcare professionals. The objective of this study is to describe the characteristics of the reports and the reporting trends in the French pharmacovigilance spontaneous reporting database from 1986 to 2001. All the reports from January 1986 to December 2001 were included. Drugs and ADRs were translated to anatomical therapeutic chemical (ATC) codes and MedDRA classifications, respectively. The total number of reports was 197 580 over the 16-year period, with linearly increase over time. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of the patients was 53 (34-70) and the male/female ratio was 0.82. The median (IQR) time between the date of occurrence of the ADR and the date of report was 73 days (34-166). The reporter was a specialist in 74% of the reports and a general practitioner in 17%. The annual rate of reporting according to medical demography strongly increased for the specialists, especially since 1994. At least one ADR was considered as serious in 44.8% of the reports. The ADRs were most frequently related to nervous system drugs (23%), followed by cardiovascular drugs (19%) and systemic anti-infectives (17%). The latter class had the fastest progression mostly due to antiretroviral therapy since 1996. According to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) coding, the system organ most often reported was skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (29%), followed by nervous system disorders (19%), gastrointestinal disorders (12%), blood and lymphatic system disorders (12%), vascular disorders (12%) and general disorders and administration site conditions (12%). All spontaneous reporting systems are affected by under-reporting. One of their goals is to generate early signals, which might be more affected by reporting bias than by under-reporting. Some improvements should be made in the design of the French database, but data collected since 1986 constitute an essential tool for the routine work of the 31 pharmacovigilance centres. This first description of the data of the French pharmacovigilance database involving all drugs and ADRs shows an increasing tendency to reporting over time, especially in specialists and for systemic anti-infective drugs. The database that uses hierarchical international classifications for drugs and adverse reactions may be used for further studies and could be the basis for an automatic signal generation system.
MeSH Terms
Adult
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/trends
Aged
Bias
Databases, Factual
Female
France
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Authors & Affiliations
7 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Thiessard Frantz
EA3676, IFR99, Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, 146 rue Leo Saignat, 33076 Bordeaux cedex, France.
[email protected]
Roux Emmanuel
Miremont-Salamé Ghada
Fourrier-Réglat Annie
Haramburu Françoise
Tubert-Bitter Pascale
Bégaud Bernard
References (29)
29 references, click to expand
-
Principles of signal detection in pharmacovigilance.
Drug Saf. 1997 Jun;16(6):355-65
PMID: 9241490
-
Review of national spontaneous reporting schemes. Strengths and weaknesses.
Adverse Drug React Toxicol Rev. 2002;21(4):231-41
PMID: 12503256
-
Different versions of the anatomical therapeutic chemical classification system and the defined daily dose--are drug utilisation data comparable?
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Dec;56(9-10):723-7
PMID: 11214783
-
Is age an independent risk factor of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized medical patients?
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Nov;39(11):1093-9
PMID: 1753048
-
Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions in general practice.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1997 Feb;43(2):177-81
PMID: 9131950
-
Does age increase the risk of adverse drug reactions?
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 Nov;54(5):550-2
PMID: 12445039
-
Adverse drug reaction monitoring: doing it the French way.
Lancet. 1985 Nov 9;2(8463):1056-8
PMID: 2865527
-
Adverse drug reactions: physicians' opinions versus a causality assessment method.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1994;46(4):285-9
PMID: 7957509
-
Rates of spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions in France.
JAMA. 2002 Oct 2;288(13):1588
PMID: 12350188
-
Pharmacists' role in reporting adverse drug reactions in an international perspective.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2004 Jul;13(7):457-64
PMID: 15269929
-
Using the Adverse Reactions Register to study the effects of age and sex on adverse drug reactions.
Stat Med. 1987 Oct-Nov;6(7):863-7
PMID: 3423506
-
Reported adverse drug events in infants and children under 2 years of age.
Pediatrics. 2002 Nov;110(5):e53
PMID: 12415059
-
Incidence of serious adverse drug reactions in general practice: a prospective study.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001 Jun;69(6):458-62
PMID: 11406744
-
Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions. Estimate based on a spontaneous reporting scheme and a sentinel system.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Aug;54(6):483-8
PMID: 9776440
-
Discovery of adverse drug reactions. A comparison of selected phase IV studies with spontaneous reporting methods.
JAMA. 1983 Apr 22-29;249(16):2226-28
PMID: 6834622
-
The defined daily dose system (DDD) for drug utilization review.
Hosp Pharm. 1986 Mar;21(3):233-4, 239-41, 258
PMID: 10317694
-
Medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients.
JAMA. 2001 Apr 25;285(16):2114-20
PMID: 11311101
-
Effects of coding dictionary on signal generation: a consideration of use of MedDRA compared with WHO-ART.
Drug Saf. 2002;25(6):445-52
PMID: 12071782
-
The medical dictionary for regulatory activities (MedDRA).
Drug Saf. 1999 Feb;20(2):109-17
PMID: 10082069
-
Admissions to hospital caused by adverse drug reactions: cross sectional incidence study. French Pharmacovigilance Centres.
BMJ. 2000 Apr 15;320(7241):1036
PMID: 10764362
-
Adverse drug reactions in a hospital general medical unit meriting notification to the Committee on Safety of Medicines.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1996 Oct;42(4):423-9
PMID: 8904613
-
A new drug classification for computer systems: the ATC extension code.
Int J Biomed Comput. 1995 Oct;40(2):121-4
PMID: 8847119
-
Age and sex distribution of suspected adverse drug reactions to newly marketed drugs in general practice in England: analysis of 48 cohort studies.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Nov;46(5):505-11
PMID: 9833605
-
A survey on factors that could affect adverse drug reaction reporting according to hospital pharmacists in Great Britain.
Drug Saf. 2000 Aug;23 (2):165-72
PMID: 10945377
-
Causal or casual? The role of causality assessment in pharmacovigilance.
Drug Saf. 1997 Dec;17(6):374-89
PMID: 9429837
-
[Imputation of the unexpected or toxic effects of drugs. Actualization of the method used in France].
Therapie. 1985 Mar-Apr;40(2):111-8
PMID: 4002188
-
Stimulating spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions by a patient : directed incentive.
Drug Saf. 2003;26(10):741-2
PMID: 12862508
-
Attitudinal survey of voluntary reporting of adverse drug reactions.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1999 Oct;48(4):623-7
PMID: 10583035
-
International Conference on Harmonisation; guidance on Addendum to E2C Clinical Safety Data Management: Periodic Safety Update Reports for Marketed Drugs; availability. Notice.
Fed Regist. 2004 Feb 5;69(24):5551-2
PMID: 14968802