Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 16098852 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Review

Suspicion and treatment of the macrosomic fetus: a review.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology ·Vol. 193 ·No. 2 ·2005-08-00 ·Pages 332-46

Chauhan SP, Grobman WA, Gherman RA, Chauhan VB, Chang G, Magann EF, Hendrix NW

Abstract

To review the prevalence of and our ability to identify macrosomic (birthweight >4000 g) fetuses. Additionally, based on the current evidence, propose an algorithm for treatment of suspected macrosomia. A review. According to the National Vital Statistics, in the United States, the prevalence of newborns weighing at least 4000 g has decreased by 10% in seven years (10.2% in 1996 and 9.2% in 2002) and 19% for newborns with weights >5000 g (0.16% and 0.13%, respectively). Bayesian calculations indicates that the posttest probability of detecting a macrosomic fetus in an uncomplicated pregnancy is variable, ranging from 15% to 79% with sonographic estimates of birth weight, and 40 to 52% with clinical estimates. Among diabetic patients the post-test probability of identifying a newborn weighing >4000 g clinically and sonographically is over 60%. Among uncomplicated pregnancies, there is sufficient evidence that suspected macrosomia is not an indication for induction or for primary cesarean delivery. For pregnancies complicated by diabetes, with a prior cesarean delivery or shoulder dystocia, delivery of a macrosomic fetus increases the rate of complications, but there is insufficient evidence about the threshold of estimated fetal weight that should prompt cesarean delivery. Due to the inaccuracies, among uncomplicated pregnancies suspicion of macrosomia is not an indication for induction or for primary cesarean delivery.

MeSH Terms
Algorithms Birth Injuries/etiology Cesarean Section Dystocia/etiology Female Fetal Macrosomia/complications,diagnosis,diagnostic imaging,epidemiology,therapy Humans Infant, Newborn Labor, Induced Pregnancy Pregnancy Outcome Pregnancy in Diabetics/complications Prevalence Sensitivity and Specificity Ultrasonography United States
Authors & Affiliations
7 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Chauhan Suneet P
Spartanburg Regional Medical Center, Spartanburg, SC, USA. [email protected]
Grobman William A
Gherman Robert A
Chauhan Vidya B
Chang Gene
Magann Everett F
Hendrix Nancy W
Article Info
Journal
American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
Abbr.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
ISSN
0002-9378
Published
2005-08-00
Pages
332-46
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
0370476
Subset
IM
Corrections
CommentIn
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]