Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 16260523 Published · ppublish English Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Assisted reproductive technology and pregnancy outcome.

Obstetrics and gynecology ·Vol. 106 ·No. 5 Pt 1 ·2005-11-00 ·Pages 1039-45

Shevell T, Malone FD, Vidaver J, Porter TF, Luthy DA, Comstock CH, Hankins GD, Eddleman K, Dolan S, Dugoff L, Craigo S, Timor IE, Carr SR, Wolfe HM, Bianchi DW, D'Alton ME

Abstract

To determine whether the use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) is associated with an increase in chromosomal abnormalities, fetal malformations, or adverse pregnancy outcomes. A prospective database from a large multicenter investigation of singleton pregnancies, the First And Second Trimester Evaluation of Risk trial, was examined. Subjects were divided into 3 groups: no ART use, use of ovulation induction (with or without intrauterine insemination), and use of in vitro fertilization (IVF). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess association between ART and adverse pregnancy outcomes (significance of differences was accepted at P < .05). A total of 36,062 pregnancies were analyzed: 34,286 (95.1%) were spontaneously conceived, 1,222 (3.4%) used ovulation induction, and 554 (1.5%) used IVF. There was no association between ART and fetal growth restriction, aneuploidy, or fetal anomalies after adjustment for age, race, marital status, years of education, prior preterm delivery, prior fetal anomaly, body mass index, smoking history, and bleeding in the current pregnancy. Ovulation induction was associated with a statistically significant increase in placental abruption, fetal loss after 24 weeks, and gestational diabetes after adjustment. Use of IVF was associated with a statistically significant increase in preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, placental abruption, placenta previa, and risk of cesarean delivery. Patients who undergo IVF are at increased risk for several adverse pregnancy outcomes. Although many of these risks are not seen in patients undergoing ovulation induction, several adverse pregnancy outcomes are still increased in this group. There was no increased incidence of fetal chromosomal or structural abnormalities in the women who used any type of ART compared with the women who conceived spontaneously. II-2.

MeSH Terms
Adult Case-Control Studies Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Incidence Logistic Models Pregnancy Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology Pregnancy Outcome Prospective Studies Reproductive Techniques, Assisted Risk Assessment
Authors & Affiliations
16 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Shevell Tracy
Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Whittingham Pavilion, Stamford Hospital, 30 Shelburne Road, Stamford, CT 06904, USA. [email protected]
Malone Fergal D
Vidaver John
Porter T Flint
Luthy David A
Comstock Christine H
Hankins Gary D
Eddleman Keith
Dolan Siobhan
Dugoff Lorraine
Craigo Sabrina
Timor Ilan E
Carr Stephen R
Wolfe Honor M
Bianchi Diana W
D'Alton Mary E
Article Info
Journal
Obstetrics and gynecology
Abbr.
Obstet Gynecol
ISSN
0029-7844
Published
2005-11-00
Pages
1039-45
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
0401101
Subset
IM
Grants
NCRR NIH HHS · M01 RR 00054 · United States
NICHD NIH HHS · R01 HD 38652 · United States
Corrections
CommentIn
CommentIn
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]