Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 17547677 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Specialist and generalist herbivores exert opposing selection on a chemical defense.

The New phytologist ·Vol. 175 ·No. 1 ·2007-00-00 ·Pages 176-184

Lankau RA

Abstract

* Plant defense traits often show high levels of genetic variation, despite clear impacts on plant fitness. This variation may be partly maintained by trade-offs in the defense against multiple herbivore species, for example between generalists and coevolved specialists. Despite a long-standing discussion in the literature on the subject, no study to date has specifically manipulated specialist and generalist herbivores independently of one another to determine whether the two guilds exert opposing selection pressures on specific defensive traits. * In two separate experiments, the dominant specialist and generalist herbivores of Brassica nigra were independently manipulated to test whether the composition of the herbivore community altered the direction of selection on a major defensive trait of the plant, sinigrin concentration. * It was found that generalist damage was negatively correlated but specialist loads were positively correlated with increasing sinigrin concentrations; and sinigrin concentration was favored when specialists were removed, disfavored (past an intermediate point) when generalists were removed and selectively neutral when plants faced both generalists and specialists.

MeSH Terms
Animal Feed Animals Choice Behavior Diet Glucosinolates/pharmacology Mustard Plant/drug effects,growth & development,parasitology Plants Seedlings/physiology Seeds/physiology Species Specificity
Chemicals
Glucosinolates sinigrin
Authors & Affiliations
1 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Lankau Richard A
Section of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
References (46)
46 references, click to expand
  1. Agrawal AA, Strauss SY, Stout MJ. 1999. Costs of induced responses and tolerance to herbivory in male and female fitness components of wild radish. Evolution 53: 1093-1104.
  2. Berenbaum MR, Zangerl AR. 1992. Genetics of secondary metabolism and herbivore resistance in plants. In: Rosenthal GA, Berenbaum MR, eds. Herbivores: their interactions with secondary plant metabolites. Volume Ii: Ecological and Evolutionary Processes. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press, 415-438.
  3. Berenbaum MR, Zangerl AR. 1998. Chemical phenotype matching between a plant and its insect herbivore. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 95: 13743-13748.
  4. Canty A. 2005. boot: Bootstrap R (S-plus) functions. Report by B. Ripley R Package, version 1.2-24.
  5. Cole RA. 1997. The relative importance of glucosinolates and amino acids to the development of two aphid pests Brevicoryne brassicae and Myzus persicae on wild and cultivated Brassica species. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 85: 121-133.
  6. Da Costa C, Jones CM. 1971. Cucumber beetle resistance and mite susceptibility controlled by the Bitter gene in Cucumis sativus L. Science 3988: 1145-1146.
  7. Van Dam NM, Vuister LWM, Bergshoeff C, Devos H, Vandermeijden E. 1995. The raison-d’être of pyrrolizidine alkaloids in Cynoglossum officinale - deterrent effects against generalist herbivores. Journal of Chemical Ecology 21: 507-523.
  8. Ehrlich P, Raven P. 1964. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18: 586-608.
  9. Ellner S, Hairston NG. 1994. Role of overlapping generations in maintaining genetic-variation in a fluctuating environment. American Naturalist 143: 403-417.
  10. Fritz RS, Simms EL, eds. 1992. Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.
  11. Giamoustaris A, Mithen R. 1995. The effect of modifying the glucosinolate content of leaves of oilseed rape (Brassica napus ssp. oleifera) on its interaction with specialist and generalist pests. Annals of Applied Biology ( 347-363): 126 (122).
  12. Gillespie J, Langley CH. 1974. General model to account for enzyme variation in natural populations. Genetics 76: 837-884.
  13. Gomez JM. 2003. Herbivory reduces the strength of pollinator-mediated selection in the Mediterranean herb Erysimum mediohispanicum: consequences for plant specialization. American Naturalist 162: 242-256.
  14. Joshi J, Vrieling K. 2005. The enemy release and Eica hypothesis revisited: incorporating the fundamental difference between specialist and generalist herbivores. Ecology Letters 8: 704-714.
  15. Juenger T, Bergelson J. 1998. Pairwise versus diffuse natural selection and the multiple herbivores of Scarlet Gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution 52: 1583-1592.
  16. Juenger T, Bergelson J. 2000. The evolution of compensation to herbivory in Scarlet Gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata: herbivore-imposed natural selection and the quantitative genetics of tolerance. Evolution 54: 764-777.
  17. Juenger T, Morton TC, Miller RE, Bergelson J. 2005. Scarlet Gilia resistance to insect herbivory: the effects of early season browsing, plant apparency, and phytochemistry on patterns of seed fly attack. Evolutionary Ecology 19: 79-101.
  18. Kliebenstein DJ. 2004. Secondary metabolites and plant/environment interactions: a view through Arabidopsis thaliana tinged glasses. Plant, Cell & Environment 27: 675-684.
  19. Kliebenstein DJ, Kroymann J, Brown P, Figuth A, Pedersen D, Gershenzon J, Mitchell-Olds T. 2001. Genetic control of natural variation in Arabidopsis glucosinolate accumulation. Plant Physiology 126: 811-825.
  20. Kliebenstein D, Pedersen D, Barker B, Mitchell-Olds T. 2002. Comparative analysis of quantitative trait loci controlling glucosinolates, myrosinase and insect resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 161: 325-332.
  21. Ludwig D, Levin SA. 1991. Evolutionary stability of plant-communities and the maintenance of multiple dispersal types. Theoretical Population Biology 40: 285-307.
  22. Macel M, Vrieling K. 2003. Pyrrolizidine alkaloids as oviposition stimulants for the cinnabar moth, Tyria jacobaeae. Journal of Chemical Ecology 29: 1435-1446.
  23. Mauricio R. 1998. Costs of resistance to natural enemies in field populations of the annual plant Arabidopsis thaliana. American Naturalist 151: 20-28.
  24. Mauricio R. 2000. Natural Selection and the Joint Evolution of Tolerance and Resistance as Plant Defenses. Evolutionary Ecology 14: 491-507.
  25. Mauricio R, Rausher MD. 1997. Experimental manipulation of putative selective agents provides evidence for the role of natural enemies in the evolution of plant defense. Evolution 51: 1435-1444.
  26. Van Der Meijden E. 1996. Plant defence, an evolutionary dilemma: contrasting effects of (specialist and generalist) herbivores and natural enemies. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 90: 307-310.
  27. Memmott J, Fowler SV, Paynter Q, Sheppard AW, Syrett P. 2000. The Invertebrate fauna on broom, Cytisus scoparius, in two native and two exotic habitats. Acta Oecologica - International Journal of Ecologica 21: 213-222.
  28. Mitchell-Olds T, Shaw RG. 1987. Regression-analysis of natural-selection - statistical-inference and biological interpretation. Evolution 41: 1149-1161.
  29. Muller C, Martens N. 2005. Testing predictions of the ‘evolution of increased competitive ability’ hypothesis for an invasive crucifer. Evolutionary Ecology 19: 533-550.
  30. Müller-Schärer H, Schaffner U, Steinger T. 2004. Evolution in invasive plants: implications for biological control. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 417-422.
  31. Nieminen M, Suomi J, Van Nouhuys S, Sauri P, Riekkola ML. 2003. Effect of iridoid glycoside content on oviposition host plant choice and parasitism in a specialist herbivore. Journal of Chemical Ecology 29: 823-844.
  32. Pilson D. 1996. Two herbivores and constraints on selection for resistance in Brassica rapa. Evolution 50: 1492-1500.
  33. Pilson D. 2000. The evolution of plant response to herbivory: simultaneously considering resistance and tolerance in Brassica rapa. Evolutionary Ecology 14: 457-489.
  34. Price PW. 1991. The plant vigor hypothesis and herbivore attack. Oikos 62: 244-251.
  35. Rausher MD. 1992. The measurement of selection on quantitative traits - biases due to environmental covariances between traits and fitness. Evolution 46: 616-626.
  36. Rausher MD, Simms EL. 1989. The evolution of resistance to herbivory in Ipomoea purpurea. 1. Attempts to detect selection. Evolution 43: 563-572.
  37. Raybould AF, Moyes CL. 2001. The ecological genetics of aliphatic glucosinolates. Heredity 87: 383-391.
  38. Shonle I, Bergelson J. 2000. Evolutionary ecology of the tropane alkaloids of Datura stramonium L. (Solanaceae). Evolution 54: 778-788.
  39. Siemens DH, Mitchel-Olds T. 1996. Glucosinolates and herbivory by specialists (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae, Lepidoptera: Plutellidae): consequences of concentration and induced resistance. Environmental Entomology 25: 1344-1353.
  40. Stanton ML, Thiede DA. 2005. Statistical convenience vs biological insight: consequences of data transformation for the analysis of fitness variation in heterogeneous environments. New Phytologists 166: 319-337.
  41. Stinchcombe JR, Rausher MD. 2001. Diffuse selection on resistance to deer herbivory in the ivyleaf morning glory, Ipomoea hederacea. American Naturalist 158: 376-388.
  42. Stinchcombe JR, Rausher MD. 2002. The evolution of tolerance to deer herbivory: modifications caused by the abundance of insect herbivores. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 269: 1241-1246.
  43. Strauss SY, Irwin RE. 2004. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of multispecies plant-animal interactions. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 35: 435-466.
  44. Strauss SY, Rudgers JA, Lau JA, Irwin RE. 2002. Direct and ecological costs of resistance to herbivory. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: 278-284.
  45. Tiffin P. 2002. Competition and time of damage affect the pattern of selection acting on plant defense against herbivores. Ecology 83: 1981-1990.
  46. Traw MB. 2002. Is induction response negatively correlated with constitutive resistance in black mustard? Evolution 56: 2196-2205.
Article Info
Journal
The New phytologist
Abbr.
New Phytol
ISSN
0028-646X
Published
2007-00-00
Pages
176-184
Language
English
Region
England
NLM ID
9882884
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]