Reporting of systematic reviews: the challenge of genetic association studies.

PLoS medicine ·Vol. 4 ·No. 6 ·2007-06-00 ·Pages e211

Khoury MJ, Little J, Higgins J, Ioannidis JP, Gwinn M

Abstract

暂无摘要

MeSH Terms

Evidence-Based Medicine Genetic Predisposition to Disease Humans Meta-Analysis as Topic Publishing/standards Review Literature as Topic

Authors & Affiliations

5 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID

Khoury Muin J

Little Julian

Higgins Julian

Ioannidis John P A

Gwinn Marta

References (6)

6 references, click to expand

Many reviews are systematic but some are more transparent and completely reported than others.
PLoS Med. 2007 Mar;4(3):e147 PMID: 17388685
Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews.
PLoS Med. 2007 Mar 27;4(3):e78 PMID: 17388659
Meta-analyses of molecular association studies: methodologic lessons for genetic epidemiology.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 Apr;56(4):297-303 PMID: 12767405
On the synthesis and interpretation of consistent but weak gene-disease associations in the era of genome-wide association studies.
Int J Epidemiol. 2007 Apr;36(2):439-45 PMID: 17182636
Clinical epidemiological quality in molecular genetic research: the need for methodological standards.
JAMA. 1999 May 26;281(20):1919-26 PMID: 10349896
A road map for efficient and reliable human genome epidemiology.
Nat Genet. 2006 Jan;38(1):3-5 PMID: 16468121

Article Info

Journal

PLoS medicine

Abbr.

PLoS Med

ISSN

1549-1676

DOI

10.1371/journal.pmed.0040211

Published

2007-06-00

Pages

e211

Language

English

Region

United States

NLM ID

101231360

PMCID

PMC1896206

Subset

Grants

Medical Research Council · MC_U105285807 · United Kingdom

Corrections

CommentOn

PMID: 17388659

External Links

PubMed source DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040211 PMC Full Text View journal details

Analysis Services

Reporting of systematic reviews: the challenge of genetic association studies.

Contact

WeChat Official Account