Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 17658394 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Assessment of fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (the LRF CLL4 Trial): a randomised controlled trial.

Lancet (London, England) ·Vol. 370 ·No. 9583 ·2007-07-21 ·Pages 230-239

Catovsky D, Richards S, Matutes E, Oscier D, Dyer M, Bezares RF, Pettitt AR, Hamblin T, Milligan DW, Child JA, Hamilton MS, Dearden CE, Smith AG, Bosanquet AG, Davis Z, Brito-Babapulle V, Else M, Wade R, Hillmen P, UK National Cancer Research Institute NCRI Haematological Oncology Clinical Studies Group, NCRI Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia Working Group

Abstract

Previous studies of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia reported high response rates to fludarabine combined with cyclophosphamide. We aimed to establish whether this treatment combination provided greater survival benefit than did chlorambucil or fludarabine. 777 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia requiring treatment were randomly assigned to fludarabine (n=194) or fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide (196) for six courses, or chlorambucil (387) for 12 courses. The primary endpoint was overall survival, with secondary endpoints of response rates, progression-free survival, toxic effects, and quality of life. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number NCT 58585610. There was no significant difference in overall survival between patients given fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide, fludarabine, or chlorambucil. Complete and overall response rates were better with fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide than with fludarabine (complete response rate 38%vs 15%, respectively; overall response rate 94%vs 80%, respectively; p<0.0001 for both comparisons), which were in turn better than with chlorambucil (complete response rate 7%, overall response rate 72%; p=0.006 and 0.04, respectively). Progression-free survival at 5 years was significantly better with fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide (36%) than with fludarabine (10%) or chlorambucil (10%; p<0.00005). Fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide was the best combination for all ages, including patients older than 70 years, and in prognostic groups defined by immunoglobulin heavy chain gene (V(H)) mutation status and cytogenetics, which were tested in 533 and 579 cases, respectively. Patients had more neutropenia and days in hospital with fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide, or fludarabine, than with chlorambucil. There was less haemolytic anaemia with fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide (5%) than with fludarabine (11%) or chlorambucil (12%). Quality of life was better for responders, but preliminary analyses showed no significant difference between treatments. A meta-analysis of these data and those of two published phase III trials showed a consistent benefit for the fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide regimen in terms of progression-free survival. Fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide should now become the standard treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and the basis for new protocols that incorporate monoclonal antibodies.

MeSH Terms
Aged Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use Chlorambucil/administration & dosage,adverse effects Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage,adverse effects Disease-Free Survival Female Humans Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/drug therapy,mortality,pathology Male Middle Aged Survival Analysis Vidarabine/administration & dosage,adverse effects,analogs & derivatives
Chemicals
Chlorambucil Cyclophosphamide Vidarabine fludarabine
Authors & Affiliations
21 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Catovsky D
Section of Haemato-Oncology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK. Electronic address: [email protected].
Richards S
Clinical Trial Service Unit, Oxford, UK.
Matutes E
Section of Haemato-Oncology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.
Oscier D
Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, UK.
Dyer Mjs
Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK.
Bezares R F
Hospital Alvarez, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Pettitt A R
University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Hamblin T
Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, UK.
Milligan D W
Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Child J A
Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.
Hamilton M S
Good Hope Hospital, Sutton Coldfield, UK.
Dearden C E
Section of Haemato-Oncology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.
Smith A G
Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.
Bosanquet A G
Bath Cancer Research, Bath, UK.
Davis Z
Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, UK.
Brito-Babapulle V
Section of Haemato-Oncology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.
Else M
Section of Haemato-Oncology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.
Wade R
Clinical Trial Service Unit, Oxford, UK.
Hillmen P
Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.
UK National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) Haematological Oncology Clinical Studies Group
NCRI Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia Working Group
Article Info
Journal
Lancet (London, England)
Abbr.
Lancet
ISSN
1474-547X
Published
2007-07-21
Pages
230-239
Language
English
Region
England
NLM ID
2985213R
Subset
IM
Grants
Medical Research Council · MC_U132670597 · United Kingdom
Medical Research Council · MC_U137686856 · United Kingdom
Databases
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT58585610
Corrections
CommentIn
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]