Abstract
Field studies with transgenic Arabidopsis lines have been performed over 8 yr, to better understand the influence that certain genes have on plant performance. Many (if not most) plant phenotypes cannot be observed under the near constant, low-stress conditions in growth chambers, making field experiments necessary. However, there are challenges in performing such experiments: permission must be obtained and regulations obeyed, the profound influence of uncontrollable biotic and abiotic factors has to be considered, and experimental design has to be strictly controlled. The aim here is to provide inspiration and guidelines for researchers who are not used to setting up such experiments, allowing others to learn from our mistakes. This is believed to be the first example of a 'manual' for field experiments with transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Many of the challenges encountered are common for all field experiments, and many researchers from ecological backgrounds are skilled in such methods. There is huge potential in combining the detailed mechanistic understanding of molecular biologists with ecologists' expertise in examining plant performance under field conditions, and it is suggested that more interdisciplinary collaborations will open up new scientific avenues to aid analyses of the roles of genetic and physiological variation in natural systems.
MeSH Terms
Arabidopsis/genetics,physiology
Genetic Research
Plants, Genetically Modified
Research Design
Authors & Affiliations
4 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Frenkel Martin
Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Johansson Jänkänpää Hanna
Umeå Plant Science Centre, Department of Plant Physiology, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Moen Jon
Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Jansson Stefan
Umeå Plant Science Centre, Department of Plant Physiology, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
References (18)
18 references, click to expand
-
Alonso JM, Stepanova AN, Leisse TJ, Kim CJ, Chen HM, Shinn P, Stevenson DK, Zimmerman J, Barajas P, Cheuk R et al . 2003. Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 301: 653-657.
-
Andersson J, Wentworth M, Walters RG, Howard CA, Ruban AV, Horton P, Jansson S. 2003. Absence of the Lhcb1 and Lhcb2 proteins of the light-harvesting complex of photosystem II - effects on photosynthesis, grana stacking and fitness. Plant Journal 35: 350-361.
-
Ballare CL. 2001. Arabidopsis mutants and other model systems in plant physiological ecology. Trends in Plant Science 6: 99.
-
Chen ZJ, Comai L, Pikaard CS. 1998. Gene dosage and stochastic effects determine the severity and direction of uniparental ribosomal RNA gene silencing (nuclear dominance) in Arabidopsis allopolyploids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 95: 14 891- 14 896.
-
European Union. 2001. Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/biotechnology/pdf/dir2001_18.pdf .
-
Frenkel M. 2008. Light, stress & herbivory - from photoprotection to trophic interactions using Arabidopsis thaliana as a model organism. PhD thesis, Umeå University, Sweden.
-
Frenkel M, Bellafiore S, Rochaix J-D, Jansson S. 2007. Hierarchy amongst photosynthetic acclimation responses for plant fitness. Physiologia Plantarum 129: 455-459.
-
Ganeteg U, Külheim C, Andersson J, Jansson S. 2004. Is each light-harvesting complex protein important for plant fitness? Plant Physiology 134: 502-509.
-
Goss EM, Bergelson J. 2007. Fitness consequences of infection of Arabidopsis thaliana with its natural bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas viridiflava. Oecologia 152: 71-81.
-
Heidel AJ, Clarke JD, Antonovics J, Dong X. 2004. Fitness costs of mutations affecting the systemic acquired resistance pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 168: 2197-2206.
-
Hilson P, Small I, Kuiper MTR. 2003. European consortia building integrated resources for Arabidopsis functional genomics. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 6: 426-429.
-
Külheim C, Ågren J, Jansson S. 2002. Rapid regulation of light harvesting and plant fitness in the field. Science 297: 91-93.
-
Külheim C, Jansson S. 2005. What leads to reduced fitness in nonphotochemical quenching mutants? Physiologia Plantarum 125: 202-211.
-
Leakey ADB, Scholes JD, Press MC. 2005. Physiological and ecological significance of sunflecks for dipterocarp seedlings. Journal of Experimental Botany 56: 469-482.
-
Paul MJ, Foyer CH. 2001. Sing regulation of photosynthesis. Journal of Experimental Botany 52: 1381-1400.
-
Pigliucci M. 2003. Selection in a model system: Ecological genetics of flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana. Ecology 84: 1700-1712.
-
Talekar NS, Shelton AM. 1993. Biology, ecology and management of the diamondback moth. Annual Review of Entomology 38: 275-301.
-
Weinig C, Stinchcombe JR, Schmitt J. 2003. QTL architecture of resistance and tolerance traits in Arabidopsis thaliana in natural environments. Molecular Ecology 12: 1153-1163.