Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 21149679 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Nucleosome-mediated cooperativity between transcription factors.

Mirny LA

Abstract

Cooperative binding of transcription factors (TFs) to promoters and other regulatory regions is essential for precise gene expression. The classical model of cooperativity requires direct interactions between TFs, thus constraining the arrangement of TF sites in regulatory regions. Recent genomic and functional studies, however, demonstrate a great deal of flexibility in such arrangements with variable distances, numbers of sites, and identities of TF sites located in cis-regulatory regions. Such flexibility is inconsistent with cooperativity by direct interactions between TFs. Here, we demonstrate that strong cooperativity among noninteracting TFs can be achieved by their competition with nucleosomes. We find that the mechanism of nucleosome-mediated cooperativity is analogous to cooperativity in another multimolecular complex: hemoglobin. This surprising analogy provides deep insights, with parallels between the heterotropic regulation of hemoglobin (e.g., the Bohr effect) and the roles of nucleosome-positioning sequences and chromatin modifications in gene expression. Nucleosome-mediated cooperativity is consistent with several experimental studies, is equally applicable to repressors and activators, allows substantial flexibility in and modularity of regulatory regions, and provides a rationale for a broad range of genomic and evolutionary observations. Striking parallels between cooperativity in hemoglobin and in transcriptional regulation point to a general mechanism that can be used in various biological systems.

MeSH Terms
Algorithms Binding Sites/genetics DNA/genetics,metabolism Gene Expression Regulation Histones/metabolism Models, Genetic Nucleosomes/metabolism Protein Binding Transcription Factors/metabolism
Chemicals
Histones Nucleosomes Transcription Factors DNA
Authors & Affiliations
1 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Mirny Leonid A
Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, and Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. [email protected]
References (64)
64 references, click to expand
  1. A single GAL4 dimer can maximally activate transcription under physiological conditions.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Aug 15;92(17):7677-80 PMID: 7644476
  2. Dynamics of replication-independent histone turnover in budding yeast.
    Science. 2007 Mar 9;315(5817):1405-8 PMID: 17347438
  3. A high-resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast.
    Nat Genet. 2007 Oct;39(10):1235-44 PMID: 17873876
  4. Rapid spontaneous accessibility of nucleosomal DNA.
    Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2005 Jan;12(1):46-53 PMID: 15580276
  5. Spontaneous access to DNA target sites in folded chromatin fibers.
    J Mol Biol. 2008 Jun 13;379(4):772-86 PMID: 18485363
  6. A model for the cooperative binding of eukaryotic regulatory proteins to nucleosomal target sites.
    J Mol Biol. 1996 May 24;258(5):800-12 PMID: 8637011
  7. Alternative models for describing the acid unfolding of the apomyoglobin folding intermediate.
    Biochemistry. 1998 May 26;37(21):7859-68 PMID: 9601047
  8. How different eukaryotic transcriptional activators can cooperate promiscuously.
    Nature. 1990 May 24;345(6273):359-61 PMID: 2188137
  9. Allosteric mechanisms of signal transduction.
    Science. 2005 Jun 3;308(5727):1424-8 PMID: 15933191
  10. Nucleosome DNA sequence pattern revealed by multiple alignment of experimentally mapped sequences.
    J Mol Biol. 1996 Sep 20;262(2):129-39 PMID: 8831784
  11. G+C content dominates intrinsic nucleosome occupancy.
    BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Dec 22;10:442 PMID: 20028554
  12. The role of chromatin during transcription.
    Cell. 2007 Feb 23;128(4):707-19 PMID: 17320508
  13. Global nature of dynamic protein-chromatin interactions in vivo: three-dimensional genome scanning and dynamic interaction networks of chromatin proteins.
    Mol Cell Biol. 2004 Jul;24(14):6393-402 PMID: 15226439
  14. Transcriptional control in the segmentation gene network of Drosophila.
    PLoS Biol. 2004 Sep;2(9):E271 PMID: 15340490
  15. Extraction of functional binding sites from unique regulatory regions: the Drosophila early developmental enhancers.
    Genome Res. 2002 Mar;12(3):470-81 PMID: 11875036
  16. The pitch of chromatin DNA is reflected in its nucleotide sequence.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Jul;77(7):3816-20 PMID: 6933438
  17. A probabilistic method to detect regulatory modules.
    Bioinformatics. 2003;19 Suppl 1:i292-301 PMID: 12855472
  18. Transcriptional regulation by the numbers: models.
    Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2005 Apr;15(2):116-24 PMID: 15797194
  19. Getting into chromatin: how do transcription factors get past the histones?
    Biochem Cell Biol. 2003 Jun;81(3):101-12 PMID: 12897843
  20. Synergistic activation of transcription by multiple binding sites for NF-kappa B even in absence of co-operative factor binding to DNA.
    J Mol Biol. 1990 Jul 20;214(2):373-80 PMID: 2199680
  21. Computational identification of developmental enhancers: conservation and function of transcription factor binding-site clusters in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Genome Biol. 2004;5(9):R61 PMID: 15345045
  22. Different gene regulation strategies revealed by analysis of binding motifs.
    Trends Genet. 2009 Oct;25(10):434-40 PMID: 19815308
  23. Sepsid even-skipped enhancers are functionally conserved in Drosophila despite lack of sequence conservation.
    PLoS Genet. 2008 Jun 27;4(6):e1000106 PMID: 18584029
  24. A high-resolution, nucleosome position map of C. elegans reveals a lack of universal sequence-dictated positioning.
    Genome Res. 2008 Jul;18(7):1051-63 PMID: 18477713
  25. Synergistic transcriptional enhancement does not depend on the number of acidic activation domains bound to the promoter.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Jan 1;88(1):224-8 PMID: 1898773
  26. Bicoid cooperative DNA binding is critical for embryonic patterning in Drosophila.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Sep 13;102(37):13176-81 PMID: 16150708
  27. Evidence for nucleosome depletion at active regulatory regions genome-wide.
    Nat Genet. 2004 Aug;36(8):900-5 PMID: 15247917
  28. A quantitative model of transcription factor-activated gene expression.
    Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2008 Nov;15(11):1192-8 PMID: 18849996
  29. A clustering property of highly-degenerate transcription factor binding sites in the mammalian genome.
    Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 May 02;34(8):2238-46 PMID: 16670430
  30. Collaborative competition mechanism for gene activation in vivo.
    Mol Cell Biol. 2003 Mar;23(5):1623-32 PMID: 12588982
  31. An atomic model of the interferon-beta enhanceosome.
    Cell. 2007 Jun 15;129(6):1111-23 PMID: 17574024
  32. DNA looping: the consequences and its control.
    Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2006 Jun;16(3):344-50 PMID: 16714105
  33. Chromatin decouples promoter threshold from dynamic range.
    Nature. 2008 May 8;453(7192):246-50 PMID: 18418379
  34. Ultrasensitive gene regulation by positive feedback loops in nucleosome modification.
    Mol Syst Biol. 2008;4:182 PMID: 18414483
  35. Interaction of the glucocorticoid receptor with the chromatin landscape.
    Mol Cell. 2008 Mar 14;29(5):611-24 PMID: 18342607
  36. Sequence and position-dependence of the equilibrium accessibility of nucleosomal DNA target sites.
    J Mol Biol. 2000 Mar 3;296(4):979-87 PMID: 10686097
  37. An ensemble model of competitive multi-factor binding of the genome.
    Genome Res. 2009 Nov;19(11):2101-12 PMID: 19720867
  38. Binding of disparate transcriptional activators to nucleosomal DNA is inherently cooperative.
    Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Mar;15(3):1405-21 PMID: 7862134
  39. Transcriptional enhancers: Intelligent enhanceosomes or flexible billboards?
    J Cell Biochem. 2005 Apr 1;94(5):890-8 PMID: 15696541
  40. Poly(dA:dT), a ubiquitous promoter element that stimulates transcription via its intrinsic DNA structure.
    EMBO J. 1995 Jun 1;14(11):2570-9 PMID: 7781610
  41. A systems view of Drosophila segmentation.
    Genome Biol. 2008;9(2):207 PMID: 18279540
  42. Large-scale turnover of functional transcription factor binding sites in Drosophila.
    PLoS Comput Biol. 2006 Oct;2(10):e130 PMID: 17040121
  43. Comparative binding of p53 to its promoter and DNA recognition elements.
    J Mol Biol. 2005 May 6;348(3):589-96 PMID: 15826656
  44. A systems approach to measuring the binding energy landscapes of transcription factors.
    Science. 2007 Jan 12;315(5809):233-7 PMID: 17218526
  45. Nucleosomes facilitate their own invasion.
    Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2004 Aug;11(8):763-9 PMID: 15258568
  46. Adaptive evolution of transcription factor binding sites.
    BMC Evol Biol. 2004 Oct 28;4:42 PMID: 15511291
  47. Automated image analysis of protein localization in budding yeast.
    Bioinformatics. 2007 Jul 1;23(13):i66-71 PMID: 17646347
  48. Nucleosome positions predicted through comparative genomics.
    Nat Genet. 2006 Oct;38(10):1210-5 PMID: 16964265
  49. Incorporating nucleosomes into thermodynamic models of transcription regulation.
    Genome Res. 2009 Aug;19(8):1480-96 PMID: 19451592
  50. The eve stripe 2 enhancer employs multiple modes of transcriptional synergy.
    Development. 1996 Jan;122(1):205-14 PMID: 8565831
  51. The DNA-encoded nucleosome organization of a eukaryotic genome.
    Nature. 2009 Mar 19;458(7236):362-6 PMID: 19092803
  52. Mechanism of protein access to specific DNA sequences in chromatin: a dynamic equilibrium model for gene regulation.
    J Mol Biol. 1995 Nov 24;254(2):130-49 PMID: 7490738
  53. Targeting gene expression to the head: the Drosophila orthodenticle gene is a direct target of the Bicoid morphogen.
    Development. 1998 Nov;125(21):4185-93 PMID: 9753673
  54. Genome-scale mapping of DNase I sensitivity in vivo using tiling DNA microarrays.
    Nat Methods. 2006 Jul;3(7):511-8 PMID: 16791208
  55. Nucleosome organization in the Drosophila genome.
    Nature. 2008 May 15;453(7193):358-62 PMID: 18408708
  56. High nucleosome occupancy is encoded at human regulatory sequences.
    PLoS One. 2010 Feb 09;5(2):e9129 PMID: 20161746
  57. ON THE NATURE OF ALLOSTERIC TRANSITIONS: A PLAUSIBLE MODEL.
    J Mol Biol. 1965 May;12:88-118 PMID: 14343300
  58. Using DNA mechanics to predict in vitro nucleosome positions and formation energies.
    Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Aug;37(14):4707-22 PMID: 19509309
  59. Receptor-receptor coupling in bacterial chemotaxis: evidence for strongly coupled clusters.
    Biophys J. 2006 Jun 15;90(12):4317-26 PMID: 16565056
  60. Nucleosome positioning signals in genomic DNA.
    Genome Res. 2007 Aug;17(8):1170-7 PMID: 17620451
  61. Discovery of functional noncoding elements by digital analysis of chromatin structure.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Nov 30;101(48):16837-42 PMID: 15550541
  62. Evidence for two modes of cooperative DNA binding in vivo that do not involve direct protein-protein interactions.
    Curr Biol. 1998 Apr 9;8(8):452-8 PMID: 9550700
  63. Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions and low nucleosome density are important for preferential accessibility of promoter regions in yeast.
    Mol Cell. 2005 Jun 10;18(6):735-48 PMID: 15949447
  64. A genomic code for nucleosome positioning.
    Nature. 2006 Aug 17;442(7104):772-8 PMID: 16862119
Article Info
Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Abbr.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
ISSN
1091-6490
Published
2010-12-28
Epub
2010-00-13
Pages
22534-9
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
7505876
PMCID
PMC3012490
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]