Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 21619668 Published · epublish English Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

The predictive value of ICD-10 diagnostic coding used to assess Charlson comorbidity index conditions in the population-based Danish National Registry of Patients.

BMC medical research methodology ·Vol. 11 ·2011-05-28 ·Pages 83

Thygesen SK, Christiansen CF, Christensen S, Lash TL, Sørensen HT

Abstract

The Charlson comorbidity index is often used to control for confounding in research based on medical databases. There are few studies of the accuracy of the codes obtained from these databases. We examined the positive predictive value (PPV) of the ICD-10 diagnostic coding in the Danish National Registry of Patients (NRP) for the 19 Charlson conditions. Among all hospitalizations in Northern Denmark between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2007 with a first-listed diagnosis of a Charlson condition in the NRP, we selected 50 hospital contacts for each condition. We reviewed discharge summaries and medical records to verify the NRP diagnoses, and computed the PPV as the proportion of confirmed diagnoses. A total of 950 records were reviewed. The overall PPV for the 19 Charlson conditions was 98.0% (95% CI; 96.9, 98.8). The PPVs ranged from 82.0% (95% CI; 68.6%, 91.4%) for diabetes with diabetic complications to 100% (one-sided 97.5% CI; 92.9%, 100%) for congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, chronic pulmonary disease, mild and severe liver disease, hemiplegia, renal disease, leukaemia, lymphoma, metastatic tumour, and AIDS. The PPV of NRP coding of the Charlson conditions was consistently high.

MeSH Terms
Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Clinical Coding/methods Comorbidity Denmark Electronic Health Records Female Health Records, Personal Humans International Classification of Diseases Male Middle Aged Patient Discharge Registries
Authors & Affiliations
5 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Thygesen Sandra K
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, The Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. [email protected]
Christiansen Christian F
Christensen Steffen
Lash Timothy L
Sørensen Henrik T
References (33)
33 references, click to expand
  1. The data quality of haematological malignancy ICD-10 diagnoses in a population-based hospital discharge registry.
    Eur J Cancer Prev. 2005 Jun;14(3):201-6 PMID: 15901987
  2. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases.
    J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Jun;45(6):613-9 PMID: 1607900
  3. Validity of rheumatoid arthritis diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Registry.
    Eur J Epidemiol. 2004;19(12):1097-103 PMID: 15678789
  4. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.
    J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83 PMID: 3558716
  5. Validity of information on comorbidity derived rom ICD-9-CCM administrative data.
    Med Care. 2002 Aug;40(8):675-85 PMID: 12187181
  6. Predictive value of stroke and transient ischemic attack discharge diagnoses in The Danish National Registry of Patients.
    J Clin Epidemiol. 2002 Jun;55(6):602-7 PMID: 12063102
  7. Analyses of data quality in registries concerning diabetes mellitus--a comparison between a population based hospital discharge and an insulin prescription registry.
    J Med Syst. 1996 Feb;20(1):1-10 PMID: 8708487
  8. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.
    Med Care. 2005 Nov;43(11):1130-9 PMID: 16224307
  9. Retrivability in The Danish National Hospital Registry of HIV and hepatitis B and C coinfection diagnoses of patients managed in HIV centers 1995-2004.
    BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Apr 25;8:25 PMID: 18439245
  10. Regional administrative health registries as a resource in clinical epidemiologyA study of options, strengths, limitations and data quality provided with examples of use.
    Int J Risk Saf Med. 1997;10(1):1-22 PMID: 23511270
  11. Administrative record linkage as a tool for public health research.
    Annu Rev Public Health. 2011;32:91-108 PMID: 21219160
  12. [Evaluation of cancer registration in Denmark in 1977. Preliminary evaluation of cancer registration by the Cancer Register and the National Patient Register].
    Ugeskr Laeger. 1985 Jul 29;147(31):2483-8 PMID: 4060314
  13. [Epicrises from a department of medical gastroenterology].
    Ugeskr Laeger. 1991 Jun 24;153(26):1868-70 PMID: 1862571
  14. Co-morbidity data in outcomes research: are clinical data derived from administrative databases a reliable alternative to chart review?
    J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Apr;53(4):343-9 PMID: 10785564
  15. A systematic review of the Charlson comorbidity index using Canadian administrative databases: a perspective on risk adjustment in critical care research.
    J Crit Care. 2005 Mar;20(1):12-9 PMID: 16015512
  16. Methodology, design, and analytic techniques to address measurement of comorbid disease.
    J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007 Mar;62(3):281-5 PMID: 17389725
  17. Quality of diagnosis and procedure coding in ICD-10 administrative data.
    Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11):1011-9 PMID: 17063133
  18. How to measure comorbidity. a critical review of available methods.
    J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 Mar;56(3):221-9 PMID: 12725876
  19. Report of the national institute on aging task force on comorbidity.
    J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007 Mar;62(3):275-80 PMID: 17389724
  20. The Danish National Hospital Register. A valuable source of data for modern health sciences.
    Dan Med Bull. 1999 Jun;46(3):263-8 PMID: 10421985
  21. The validity of the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in routine statistics: a comparison of mortality and hospital discharge data with the Danish MONICA registry.
    J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 Feb;56(2):124-30 PMID: 12654406
  22. Performance of comorbidity scores to control for confounding in epidemiologic studies using claims data.
    Am J Epidemiol. 2001 Nov 1;154(9):854-64 PMID: 11682368
  23. Validity of ascertainment of co-morbid illness using administrative databases: a systematic review.
    Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010 Jun;16(6):715-21 PMID: 19614717
  24. Validity of dementia diagnoses in the Danish hospital registers.
    Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2007;24(3):220-8 PMID: 17690555
  25. Validity of stroke diagnoses in a National Register of Patients.
    Neuroepidemiology. 2007;28(3):150-4 PMID: 17478969
  26. A framework for evaluation of secondary data sources for epidemiological research.
    Int J Epidemiol. 1996 Apr;25(2):435-42 PMID: 9119571
  27. Data quality of administratively collected hospital discharge data for liver cirrhosis epidemiology.
    J Med Syst. 1997 Feb;21(1):11-20 PMID: 9172066
  28. New ICD-10 version of the Charlson comorbidity index predicted in-hospital mortality.
    J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Dec;57(12):1288-94 PMID: 15617955
  29. Use of comorbidity scores for control of confounding in studies using administrative databases.
    Int J Epidemiol. 2000 Oct;29(5):891-8 PMID: 11034974
  30. A user's guide to selecting a comorbidity index for clinical research.
    J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Aug;59(8):849-55 PMID: 16828679
  31. Measuring potentially avoidable hospital readmissions.
    J Clin Epidemiol. 2002 Jun;55(6):573-87 PMID: 12063099
  32. Epidemiology. When an entire country is a cohort.
    Science. 2000 Mar 31;287(5462):2398-9 PMID: 10766613
  33. Comorbidities, complications, and coding bias. Does the number of diagnosis codes matter in predicting in-hospital mortality?
    JAMA. 1992 Apr 22-29;267(16):2197-203 PMID: 1556797
Article Info
Journal
BMC medical research methodology
Abbr.
BMC Med Res Methodol
ISSN
1471-2288
Published
2011-05-28
Epub
2011-00-28
Pages
83
Language
English
Region
England
NLM ID
100968545
PMCID
PMC3125388
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]