Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 21663655 Published · epublish English Journal Article

Application of GRADE: making evidence-based recommendations about diagnostic tests in clinical practice guidelines.

Implementation science : IS ·Vol. 6 ·2011-06-10 ·Pages 62

Hsu J, Brożek JL, Terracciano L, Kreis J, Compalati E, Stein AT, Fiocchi A, Schünemann HJ

Abstract

Accurate diagnosis is a fundamental aspect of appropriate healthcare. However, clinicians need guidance when implementing diagnostic tests given the number of tests available and resource constraints in healthcare. Practitioners of health often feel compelled to implement recommendations in guidelines, including recommendations about the use of diagnostic tests. However, the understanding about diagnostic tests by guideline panels and the methodology for developing recommendations is far from completely explored. Therefore, we evaluated the factors that guideline developers and users need to consider for the development of implementable recommendations about diagnostic tests. Using a critical analysis of the process, we present the results of a case study using the Grading of Recommendations Applicability, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to develop a clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis of Cow Milk Allergy with the World Allergy Organization. To ensure that guideline panels can develop informed recommendations about diagnostic tests, it appears that more emphasis needs to be placed on group processes, including question formulation, defining patient-important outcomes for diagnostic tests, and summarizing evidence. Explicit consideration of concepts of diagnosis from evidence-based medicine, such as pre-test probability and treatment threshold, is required to facilitate the work of a guideline panel and to formulate implementable recommendations. This case study provides useful guidance for guideline developers and clinicians about what they ought to demand from clinical practice guidelines to facilitate implementation and strengthen confidence in recommendations about diagnostic tests. Applying a structured framework like the GRADE approach with its requirement for transparency in the description of the evidence and factors that influence recommendations facilitates laying out the process and decision factors that are required for the development, interpretation, and implementation of recommendations about diagnostic tests.

MeSH Terms
Delphi Technique Diagnosis Diagnostic Tests, Routine/standards Evidence-Based Medicine/methods Humans Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards Predictive Value of Tests Probability Risk Factors
Authors & Affiliations
8 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Hsu Jonathan
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Brożek Jan L
Terracciano Luigi
Kreis Julia
Compalati Enrico
Stein Airton Tetelbom
Fiocchi Alessandro
Schünemann Holger J
References (17)
17 references, click to expand
  1. Incidence of parentally reported and clinically diagnosed food hypersensitivity in the first year of life.
    J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 May;117(5):1118-24 PMID: 16675341
  2. Guidelines for reading literature reviews.
    CMAJ. 1988 Apr 15;138(8):697-703 PMID: 3355948
  3. Supplementary feeding in maternity hospitals and the risk of cow's milk allergy: A prospective study of 6209 infants.
    J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999 Aug;104(2 Pt 1):457-61 PMID: 10452771
  4. Adverse reactions to milk in infants.
    Acta Paediatr. 2008 Feb;97(2):196-200 PMID: 18254909
  5. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies.
    BMJ. 2008 May 17;336(7653):1106-10 PMID: 18483053
  6. World Allergy Organization (WAO) Diagnosis and Rationale for Action against Cow's Milk Allergy (DRACMA) Guidelines.
    World Allergy Organ J. 2010 Apr;3(4):57-161 PMID: 23268426
  7. GRADE: assessing the quality of evidence for diagnostic recommendations.
    Evid Based Med. 2008 Dec;13(6):162-3 PMID: 19043023
  8. Challenges in systematic reviews of diagnostic technologies.
    Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1048-55 PMID: 15968029
  9. Using the entire cohort in the receiver operating characteristic analysis maximizes precision of the minimal important difference.
    J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Apr;62(4):374-9 PMID: 19013766
  10. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews.
    BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003 Nov 10;3:25 PMID: 14606960
  11. Cow's milk protein intolerance in infants under 1 year of age: a prospective epidemiological study.
    Eur J Pediatr. 1993 Aug;152(8):640-4 PMID: 8404966
  12. Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development.
    Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(3):i-iv, 1-88 PMID: 9561895
  13. Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Ann Intern Med. 2008 Dec 16;149(12):889-97 PMID: 19075208
  14. Clinical course of cow's milk protein allergy/intolerance and atopic diseases in childhood.
    Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2002;13(s15):23-8 PMID: 12688620
  15. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 3. Group composition and consultation process.
    Health Res Policy Syst. 2006 Nov 29;4:15 PMID: 17134482
  16. The prevalence of food allergy: a meta-analysis.
    J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Sep;120(3):638-46 PMID: 17628647
  17. Comparative accuracy: assessing new tests against existing diagnostic pathways.
    BMJ. 2006 May 6;332(7549):1089-92 PMID: 16675820
Article Info
Journal
Implementation science : IS
Abbr.
Implement Sci
ISSN
1748-5908
Published
2011-06-10
Epub
2011-00-10
Pages
62
Language
English
Region
England
NLM ID
101258411
PMCID
PMC3126717
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]