Abstract
Survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is determined by the extent of the tumor and the underlying liver function. We aimed to develop a survival model for HCC based on objective parameters including the Model for Endstage Liver Disease (MELD) as a gauge of liver dysfunction. This analysis is based on 477 patients with HCC seen at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 1994 and 2008 (derivation cohort) and 904 patients at the Korean National Cancer Center between 2000 and 2003 (validation cohort). Multivariate proportional hazards models and corresponding risk score were created based on baseline demographic, clinical, and tumor characteristics. Internal and external validation of the model was performed. Discrimination and calibration of this new model were compared against existing models including Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC), Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP), and Japan Integrated Staging (JIS) scores. The majority of the patients had viral hepatitis as the underlying liver disease (100% in the derivation cohort and 85% in the validation cohort). The survival model incorporated MELD, age, number of tumor nodules, size of the largest nodule, vascular invasion, metastasis, serum albumin, and alpha-fetoprotein. In cross-validation, the coefficients remained largely unchanged between iterations. Observed survival in the validation cohort matched closely with what was predicted by the model. The concordance (c)-statistic for this model (0.77) was superior to that for BCLC (0.71), CLIP (0.70), or JIS (0.70). The score was able to further classify patient survival within each stage of the BCLC classification. A new model to predict survival of HCC patients based on objective parameters provides refined prognostication and supplements the BCLC classification.
MeSH Terms
Aged
Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/mortality,pathology
Cohort Studies
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Liver Neoplasms/mortality,pathology
Male
Middle Aged
Models, Statistical
Neoplasm Staging/mortality,standards
Predictive Value of Tests
Proportional Hazards Models
Reproducibility of Results
Risk Factors
Authors & Affiliations
12 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Yang Ju Dong
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Kim W Ray
Park Kyung Woo
Chaiteerakij Roongruedee
Kim Bohyun
Sanderson Schuyler O
Larson Joseph J
Pedersen Rachel A
Therneau Terry M
Gores Gregory J
Roberts Lewis R
Park Joong-Won
References (21)
21 references, click to expand
-
Prognostic staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (CLIP score): its value and limitations, and a proposal for a new staging system, the Japan Integrated Staging Score (JIS score).
J Gastroenterol. 2003;38(3):207-15
PMID: 12673442
-
The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD).
Hepatology. 2007 Mar;45(3):797-805
PMID: 17326206
-
Assessing the generalizability of prognostic information.
Ann Intern Med. 1999 Mar 16;130(6):515-24
PMID: 10075620
-
Survival analysis of 904 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in a hepatitis B virus-endemic area.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Mar;23(3):467-73
PMID: 17764529
-
Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of 7 staging systems in an American cohort.
Hepatology. 2005 Apr;41(4):707-16
PMID: 15795889
-
Cirrhosis is present in most patients with hepatitis B and hepatocellular carcinoma.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Jan;9(1):64-70
PMID: 20831903
-
Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification.
Semin Liver Dis. 1999;19(3):329-38
PMID: 10518312
-
Construction of the Chinese University Prognostic Index for hepatocellular carcinoma and comparison with the TNM staging system, the Okuda staging system, and the Cancer of the Liver Italian Program staging system: a study based on 926 patients.
Cancer. 2002 Mar 15;94(6):1760-9
PMID: 11920539
-
[Practice guideline for diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma].
Korean J Hepatol. 2004 Jun;10(2):88-98
PMID: 15218342
-
Mortality and hospital utilization for hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States.
Gastroenterology. 2005 Aug;129(2):486-93
PMID: 16083705
-
Hepatocellular carcinoma incidence, mortality, and survival trends in the United States from 1975 to 2005.
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Mar 20;27(9):1485-91
PMID: 19224838
-
A new prognostic classification for predicting survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Groupe d'Etude et de Traitement du Carcinome Hépatocellulaire.
J Hepatol. 1999 Jul;31(1):133-41
PMID: 10424293
-
Hepatocellular carcinoma: A global view.
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Aug;7(8):448-58
PMID: 20628345
-
Prospective validation of the CLIP score: a new prognostic system for patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) Investigators.
Hepatology. 2000 Apr;31(4):840-5
PMID: 10733537
-
Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL conference. European Association for the Study of the Liver.
J Hepatol. 2001 Sep;35(3):421-30
PMID: 11592607
-
A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease.
Hepatology. 2001 Feb;33(2):464-70
PMID: 11172350
-
Prognostic value and clinical relevance of the 6th Edition 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Oct;203(4):426-35
PMID: 17000385
-
Management of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Hepatology. 2005 Nov;42(5):1208-36
PMID: 16250051
-
Natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma and prognosis in relation to treatment. Study of 850 patients.
Cancer. 1985 Aug 15;56(4):918-28
PMID: 2990661
-
Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers.
Gastroenterology. 2003 Jan;124(1):91-6
PMID: 12512033
-
A new prognostic system for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study of 435 patients: the Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) investigators.
Hepatology. 1998 Sep;28(3):751-5
PMID: 9731568