Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 23193215 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Automated detection and classification of type 1 versus type 2 diabetes using electronic health record data.

Diabetes care ·Vol. 36 ·No. 4 ·2013-04-00 ·Pages 914-21

Klompas M, Eggleston E, McVetta J, Lazarus R, Li L, Platt R

Abstract

To create surveillance algorithms to detect diabetes and classify type 1 versus type 2 diabetes using structured electronic health record (EHR) data. We extracted 4 years of data from the EHR of a large, multisite, multispecialty ambulatory practice serving ∼700,000 patients. We flagged possible cases of diabetes using laboratory test results, diagnosis codes, and prescriptions. We assessed the sensitivity and positive predictive value of novel combinations of these data to classify type 1 versus type 2 diabetes among 210 individuals. We applied an optimized algorithm to a live, prospective, EHR-based surveillance system and reviewed 100 additional cases for validation. The diabetes algorithm flagged 43,177 patients. All criteria contributed unique cases: 78% had diabetes diagnosis codes, 66% fulfilled laboratory criteria, and 46% had suggestive prescriptions. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of ICD-9 codes for type 1 diabetes were 26% (95% CI 12-49) and 94% (83-100) for type 1 codes alone; 90% (81-95) and 57% (33-86) for two or more type 1 codes plus any number of type 2 codes. An optimized algorithm incorporating the ratio of type 1 versus type 2 codes, plasma C-peptide and autoantibody levels, and suggestive prescriptions flagged 66 of 66 (100% [96-100]) patients with type 1 diabetes. On validation, the optimized algorithm correctly classified 35 of 36 patients with type 1 diabetes (raw sensitivity, 97% [87-100], population-weighted sensitivity, 65% [36-100], and positive predictive value, 88% [78-98]). Algorithms applied to EHR data detect more cases of diabetes than claims codes and reasonably discriminate between type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

MeSH Terms
Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Child Child, Preschool Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/classification,diagnosis Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/classification,diagnosis Electronic Health Records Female Humans Infant Infant, Newborn Male Middle Aged Young Adult
Authors & Affiliations
6 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Klompas Michael
Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [email protected]
Eggleston Emma
McVetta Jason
Lazarus Ross
Li Lingling
Platt Richard
References (19)
19 references, click to expand
  1. Incidence of diabetes in youth in the United States.
    JAMA. 2007 Jun 27;297(24):2716-24 PMID: 17595272
  2. Presence of diabetic ketoacidosis at diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in youth: the Search for Diabetes in Youth Study.
    Pediatrics. 2008 May;121(5):e1258-66 PMID: 18450868
  3. Etiological approach to characterization of diabetes type: the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study.
    Diabetes Care. 2011 Jul;34(7):1628-33 PMID: 21636800
  4. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus.
    Diabetes Care. 2011 Jan;34 Suppl 1:S62-9 PMID: 21193628
  5. The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records.
    N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 5;363(6):501-4 PMID: 20647183
  6. Integrating clinical practice and public health surveillance using electronic medical record systems.
    Am J Prev Med. 2012 Jun;42(6 Suppl 2):S154-62 PMID: 22704432
  7. Glycemic control in youth with diabetes: the SEARCH for diabetes in Youth Study.
    J Pediatr. 2009 Nov;155(5):668-72.e1-3 PMID: 19643434
  8. Surveillance of certain health behaviors and conditions among states and selected local areas - Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2007.
    MMWR Surveill Summ. 2010 Feb 5;59(1):1-220 PMID: 20134401
  9. The geoepidemiology of type 1 diabetes.
    Autoimmun Rev. 2010 Mar;9(5):A355-65 PMID: 19969107
  10. Validation of diabetes case definitions using administrative claims data.
    Diabet Med. 2011 Apr;28(4):424-7 PMID: 21392063
  11. Validation of classification algorithms for childhood diabetes identified from administrative data.
    Pediatr Diabetes. 2012 May;13(3):229-34 PMID: 21771232
  12. An algorithm to differentiate diabetic respondents in the Canadian Community Health Survey.
    Health Rep. 2008 Mar;19(1):71-9 PMID: 18457213
  13. U.S. Regional health information organizations: progress and challenges.
    Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Mar-Apr;28(2):483-92 PMID: 19276008
  14. Sharing clinical data electronically: a critical challenge for fixing the health care system.
    JAMA. 2012 Apr 25;307(16):1695-6 PMID: 22535851
  15. A clinical trial to maintain glycemic control in youth with type 2 diabetes.
    N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 14;366(24):2247-56 PMID: 22540912
  16. Dead or alive?
    Diabetes Care. 2012 Mar;35(3):459-60 PMID: 22355015
  17. Electronic Support for Public Health: validated case finding and reporting for notifiable diseases using electronic medical data.
    J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Jan-Feb;16(1):18-24 PMID: 18952940
  18. Increasing incidence of type 1 diabetes in 0- to 17-year-old Colorado youth.
    Diabetes Care. 2007 Mar;30(3):503-9 PMID: 17327312
  19. Health information exchange among US hospitals.
    Am J Manag Care. 2011 Nov;17(11):761-8 PMID: 22084896
Article Info
Journal
Diabetes care
Abbr.
Diabetes Care
ISSN
1935-5548
Published
2013-04-00
Epub
2012-00-27
Pages
914-21
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
7805975
PMCID
PMC3609529
Subset
IM
Grants
PHITPO CDC HHS · P01 HK000088 · United States
PHITPO CDC HHS · 1P01-HK-00088 · United States
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]