Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 24676403 Published · ppublish English Journal Article

Too old to have children? Lessons from natural fertility populations.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England) ·Vol. 29 ·No. 6 ·2014-06-00 ·Pages 1304-12

Eijkemans MJ, van Poppel F, Habbema DF, Smith KR, Leridon H, te Velde ER

Abstract

Is it possible to construct an age curve denoting the ages above which women are biologically too old to reproduce? We constructed a curve based on the distribution of female age at last birth in natural fertility populations reflecting the ages above which women have become biologically too old to have children. The median age at last birth (ALB) for females is ∼40-41 years of age across a range of natural fertility populations. This suggests that there is a fairly universal pattern of age-related fertility decline. However, little is known about the distribution of female ALB and in the present era of modern birth control, it is impossible to assess the age-specific distribution of ALB. Reliable information is lacking that could benefit couples who envisage delaying childbearing. This study is a review of high-quality historical data sets of natural fertility populations in which the distributions of female age at last birth were analysed. The studies selected used a retrospective cohort design where women were followed as they age through their reproductive years. Using a common set of eligibility criteria, large data files of natural fertility populations were prepared such that the analysis could be performed in parallel across all populations. Data on the ALB and confounding variables are presented as box and whisker plots denoting the 5th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 95th percentile distribution of the age at last birth for each population. The analysis includes the estimation of Kaplan-Meier curves for age at last birth of each population. The hazard curve for ALB was obtained by plotting the smoothed hazard curve of each population and taking the lowest hazard within a time period of at least 5 years. This lowest hazard curve was then transformed into a cumulative distribution function representing the composite curve of the end of biological fertility. This curve was based on the data from three of the six populations, having the lowest hazards of end of fertility. We selected six natural fertility populations comprising 58 051 eligible women. While these populations represent different historical time periods, the distribution of the ages at last birth is remarkably similar. The curve denoting the end of fertility indicates that <3% of women had their last birth at age 20 years meaning that almost 98% were able to have at least one child thereafter. The cumulative curve for the end of fertility slowly increases from 4.5% at age 25 years, 7% at age 30 years, 12% at age 35 years and 20% at age 38 years. Thereafter, it rises rapidly to about 50% at age 41, almost 90% at age 45 years and approaching 100% at age 50 years. It may be argued that these historical fertility data do not apply to the present time; however, the age-dependent decline in fertility is similar to current populations and is consistent with the pattern seen in women treated by donor insemination. Furthermore, for reproductive ageing, we note that it is unlikely that such a conserved biological process with a high degree of heritability would have changed significantly within a century or two. We argue that the age-specific ALB curve can be used to counsel couples who envisage having children in the future. Our findings challenge the unsubstantiated pessimism regarding the possibility of natural conception after age 35 years. No external funding was either sought or obtained for this study. There are no conflicts of interest to be declared.

Keywords
delay of childbearing natural fertility ovarian ageing reproductive demography reproductive epidemiology
MeSH Terms
Adult Age Factors Aging/physiology Female Fertility/physiology Humans Middle Aged Retrospective Studies
Authors & Affiliations
6 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Eijkemans Marinus J C
Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
van Poppel Frans
Habbema Dik F
Smith Ken R
Leridon Henri
te Velde Egbert R
References (37)
37 references, click to expand
  1. Effects of sexual intercourse patterns in time to pregnancy studies.
    Am J Epidemiol. 2007 May 1;165(9):1088-95 PMID: 17289774
  2. Advanced maternal age--how old is too old?
    N Engl J Med. 2004 Nov 4;351(19):1927-9 PMID: 15525717
  3. Does relaxed reproductive selection explain the decline in male reproductive health? A new hypothesis.
    Epidemiology. 2002 Jan;13(1):113-4 PMID: 11805597
  4. Fertility and post-reproductive longevity.
    Soc Biol. 2002 Fall-Winter;49(3-4):185-205 PMID: 14652917
  5. Delaying childbearing: effect of age on fecundity and outcome of pregnancy.
    BMJ. 1991 Jun 8;302(6789):1361-5 PMID: 2059713
  6. Demographics. Europe's population at a turning point.
    Science. 2003 Mar 28;299(5615):1991-2 PMID: 12663901
  7. A specification of marital fertility by parents' age, age at marriage and marital duration.
    Demography. 1982 Aug;19(3):335-50 PMID: 6749566
  8. Women's awareness and perceptions of delay in childbearing.
    Fertil Steril. 2008 Oct;90(4):1036-42 PMID: 17905234
  9. Some data on natural fertility.
    Eugen Q. 1961 Jun;8:81-91 PMID: 13713432
  10. Cumulative live-birth rates after in vitro fertilization.
    N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 15;360(3):236-43 PMID: 19144939
  11. Declining fecundity and ovarian ageing in natural fertility populations.
    Maturitas. 1998 Oct 12;30(2):127-36 PMID: 9871907
  12. The age pattern of fecundability: an analysis of French Canadian and Hutterite birth histories.
    Soc Biol. 2000 Spring-Summer;47(1-2):34-50 PMID: 11521455
  13. Deep human genealogies reveal a selective advantage to be on an expanding wave front.
    Science. 2011 Nov 25;334(6059):1148-50 PMID: 22052972
  14. The variability of female reproductive ageing.
    Hum Reprod Update. 2002 Mar-Apr;8(2):141-54 PMID: 12099629
  15. Heritability of age at natural menopause in the Framingham Heart Study.
    J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Jun;90(6):3427-30 PMID: 15769979
  16. Heritability of menopausal age in mothers and daughters.
    Fertil Steril. 2004 Nov;82(5):1348-51 PMID: 15533358
  17. Heritability and genetic constraints of life-history trait evolution in preindustrial humans.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Feb 22;102(8):2838-43 PMID: 15701704
  18. Europe's second demographic transition.
    Popul Bull. 1987 Mar;42(1):1-59 PMID: 12268395
  19. Infertility and environmental pollutants.
    Br Med Bull. 2003;68:47-70 PMID: 14757709
  20. Do cycle disturbances explain the age-related decline of female fertility? Cycle characteristics of women aged over 40 years compared with a reference population of young women.
    Hum Reprod. 2003 Mar;18(3):495-501 PMID: 12615813
  21. Anti-Mullerian hormone--is it a crystal ball for predicting ovarian ageing?
    Hum Reprod. 2011 Nov;26(11):2925-32 PMID: 21849297
  22. Social age deadlines for the childbearing of women and men.
    Hum Reprod. 2011 Mar;26(3):616-22 PMID: 21159684
  23. Marital coitus across the life course.
    J Biosoc Sci. 2005 Jul;37(4):499-518 PMID: 16082859
  24. Starting, stopping, and spacing during the early stages of fertility transition: the experience of German village populations in the 18th and 19th centuries.
    Demography. 1987 May;24(2):143-62 PMID: 3301424
  25. Anti-mullerian hormone predicts menopause: a long-term follow-up study in normoovulatory women.
    J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Aug;96(8):2532-9 PMID: 21613357
  26. Vulvar mucus observations and the probability of pregnancy.
    Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jun;101(6):1285-93 PMID: 12798538
  27. Is human fecundity declining in Western countries?
    Hum Reprod. 2010 Jun;25(6):1348-53 PMID: 20395222
  28. Volitional determinants and age-related decline in fecundability: a general population prospective cohort study in Denmark.
    Fertil Steril. 2013 Jun;99(7):1958-64 PMID: 23517858
  29. Trends in sperm counts: the saga continues.
    Epidemiology. 2011 Sep;22(5):617-9 PMID: 21629118
  30. [Population files and database management: the BALSAC database and the INGRES/INGRID system].
    Hist Mes. 1989;4(1-2):39-57 PMID: 12282730
  31. [Fertility and literacy in Saugenay and Qeubec (nineteenth to twentieth centuries)].
    Ann Demogr Hist (Paris). 1991;:173-201 PMID: 11638405
  32. The role of genetic factors in age at natural menopause.
    Hum Reprod. 2001 Sep;16(9):2014-8 PMID: 11527915
  33. Increased infertility with age in men and women.
    Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jan;103(1):51-6 PMID: 14704244
  34. Fecundity and natural fertility in humans.
    Oxf Rev Reprod Biol. 1989;11:61-109 PMID: 2697833
  35. Evidence for decreasing quality of semen during past 50 years.
    BMJ. 1992 Sep 12;305(6854):609-13 PMID: 1393072
  36. Reproductive span and rate of reproduction among Hutterite women.
    Fertil Steril. 1957 Jan-Feb;8(1):89-97 PMID: 13405050
  37. Age and infertility.
    Science. 1986 Sep 26;233(4771):1389-94 PMID: 3755843
Article Info
Journal
Human reproduction (Oxford, England)
Abbr.
Hum Reprod
ISSN
1460-2350
Published
2014-06-00
Epub
2014-00-27
Pages
1304-12
Language
English
Region
England
NLM ID
8701199
PMCID
PMC4389129
Subset
IM
Grants
NIA NIH HHS · R01 AG022095 · United States
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]