Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 24838252 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Volumetric velocity measurements in restricted geometries using spiral sampling: a phantom study.

Magma (New York, N.Y.) ·Vol. 28 ·No. 2 ·2015-04-00 ·页码 103-18

Nilsson A, Revstedt J, Heiberg E, Ståhlberg F, Bloch KM

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of maximum velocity measurements using volumetric phase-contrast imaging with spiral readouts in a stenotic flow phantom. In a phantom model, maximum velocity, flow, pressure gradient, and streamline visualizations were evaluated using volumetric phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with velocity encoding in one (extending on current clinical practice) and three directions (for characterization of the flow field) using spiral readouts. Results of maximum velocity and pressure drop were compared to computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations, as well as corresponding low-echo-time (TE) Cartesian data. Flow was compared to 2D through-plane phase contrast (PC) upstream from the restriction. Results obtained with 3D through-plane PC as well as 4D PC at shortest TE using a spiral readout showed excellent agreements with the maximum velocity values obtained with CFD (<1 % for both methods), while larger deviations were seen using Cartesian readouts (-2.3 and 13 %, respectively). Peak pressure drop calculations from 3D through-plane PC and 4D PC spiral sequences were respectively 14 and 13 % overestimated compared to CFD. Identification of the maximum velocity location, as well as the accurate velocity quantification can be obtained in stenotic regions using short-TE spiral volumetric PC imaging.

MeSH 主题词
Algorithms Arterial Occlusive Diseases/pathology,physiopathology Arteries/pathology,physiopathology Blood Flow Velocity Blood Volume Blood Volume Determination/methods Humans Image Enhancement/methods Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods Magnetic Resonance Angiography/instrumentation,methods Phantoms, Imaging Reproducibility of Results Sample Size Sensitivity and Specificity
作者与单位
共 5 位作者,点击展开单位 / ORCID
Nilsson Anders
Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, [email protected].
Revstedt Johan
Heiberg Einar
Ståhlberg Freddy
Bloch Karin Markenroth
Article Info
Journal
Magma (New York, N.Y.)
Abbr.
MAGMA
ISSN
1352-8661
Corresponding email
Published
2015-04-00
电子出版
2014-00-18
页码
103-18
Language
English
Country/Region
Germany
NLM ID
9310752
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]