Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 25272983 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Assisted reproductive outcomes of male cancer survivors.

Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice ·Vol. 9 ·No. 2 ·2015-06-00 ·Pages 208-14

García A, Herrero MB, Holzer H, Tulandi T, Chan P

Abstract

The objective of our study was to evaluate the reproductive outcome of male cancer survivors treated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using cryopreserved sperm and compare it with the same treatment in non-cancer males. We retrospectively analyzed database derived from cancer and non-cancer patients undergoing sperm cryopreservation from August 2008 to August 2012 at a university-based center. We evaluated the reproductive outcome of those cancer and non-cancer patients that had frozen sperm and returned subsequently to the clinic for assisted reproduction. We studied 272 males with cancer and 296 infertile males. The most prevalent types of cancer in our cohort were lymphoma (25.3 %), testicular cancer (19.2 %), leukemia (7.3 %), and other malignancies including sarcoma, gastrointestinal, and central nervous system malignancies (48.2 %). The use rate of cryopreserved sperm was 10.7 % for cancer patients and 30.7 % for non-cancer patients. The mean age of males with cancer who returned to the clinic for fertility treatment was 36.7 ± 6 years, and the diagnoses were testis cancer (43.4 %), lymphoma (36.9 %), leukemia (13 %), and other malignancies (6.7 %). Live birth rate of the cancer cohort was 62.1 %, which was higher than that of the normospermic non-cancer population (p < 0.0047). The use rate of cryopreserved sperm from oncofertility preservation cases is at around 10 %. The live birth rate using assisted reproductive technologies among these patients is at least comparable to that of the non-cancer population. To our knowledge, this was the first comparative study of male cancer survivors treated with ICSI using cryopreserved sperm, which were compared to non-cancer males undergoing the same treatment. Male fertility preservation is a highly valued service that should be strongly encouraged prior to beginning cytotoxic cancer treatment. These results can help healthcare professionals in oncology to improve the quality of counseling on fertility preservation when managing young men with newly diagnosed cancer that require gonadotoxic treatment.

MeSH Terms
Adult Cryopreservation/statistics & numerical data Female Fertility Preservation/statistics & numerical data Humans Infertility, Male/rehabilitation Male Middle Aged Neoplasms/mortality,rehabilitation Pregnancy Retrospective Studies Semen Preservation/statistics & numerical data Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic Survivors Treatment Outcome Young Adult
Authors & Affiliations
5 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
García Ainhoa
MUHC Reproductive Center, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Herrero María Belén
Holzer Hananel
Tulandi Togas
Chan Peter
References (37)
37 references, click to expand
  1. Factors that affect outcome of in-vitro fertilisation treatment.
    Lancet. 1996 Nov 23;348(9039):1402-6 PMID: 8937279
  2. The importance of fertility preservation in cancer patients.
    Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2014 May;14(5):487-9 PMID: 24506112
  3. Evidence-Based Recommendations for Fertility Preservation Options for Inclusion in Treatment Protocols for Pediatric and Adolescent Patients Diagnosed With Cancer.
    J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2014 Jul;31(4):211-222 PMID: 24799444
  4. Neonatal outcome and congenital malformations in children born after ICSI with testicular or epididymal sperm: a controlled national cohort study.
    Hum Reprod. 2013 Jan;28(1):230-40 PMID: 23154066
  5. Use rate and assisted reproduction technologies outcome of cryopreserved semen from 629 cancer patients.
    Fertil Steril. 2008 Dec;90(6):2245-50 PMID: 18191846
  6. Patient attitudes toward fertility preservation.
    Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009 Aug;53(2):281-4 PMID: 19301387
  7. Fertilization and embryo development with spermatozoa obtained from testicular sperm extraction into oocytes generated from human chorionic gonadotropin-primed in vitro maturation cycles.
    Fertil Steril. 2013 Oct;100(4):989-93 PMID: 23806848
  8. Effects of assisted reproductive technologies on human sex ratio at birth.
    Fertil Steril. 2014 May;101(5):1321-5 PMID: 24602756
  9. Gender incidence of intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection-derived embryos: a prospective randomized study.
    Reprod Biomed Online. 2012 Apr;24(4):420-3 PMID: 22377154
  10. American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on fertility preservation in cancer patients.
    J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jun 20;24(18):2917-31 PMID: 16651642
  11. Semen quality before and after gonadotoxic treatment.
    Hum Reprod. 2005 Mar;20(3):774-81 PMID: 15689346
  12. Assisted reproduction in male cancer survivors: fertility treatment and outcome in 67 couples.
    Hum Reprod. 2004 Dec;19(12):2806-10 PMID: 15388679
  13. Fertility preservation and reproduction in patients facing gonadotoxic therapies: a committee opinion.
    Fertil Steril. 2013 Nov;100(5):1224-31 PMID: 24094423
  14. The effect of endometriosis on in vitro fertilisation outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    BJOG. 2013 Oct;120(11):1308-20 PMID: 23834505
  15. Controversy over the use of fresh versus frozen-thawed sperm for in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
    Fertil Steril. 2014 Feb;101(2):336 PMID: 24290001
  16. Male:female sex ratio in births resulting from IVF according to swim-up versus Percoll preparation of inseminated sperm.
    Arch Androl. 1994 Jul-Aug;33(1):63-5 PMID: 7979811
  17. Impact of blastocyst transfer on offspring sex ratio and the monozygotic twinning rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Fertil Steril. 2009 Jun;91(6):2381-90 PMID: 18718582
  18. Comparison of the offspring sex ratio between cleavage stage embryo transfer and blastocyst transfer.
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;49(1):35-9 PMID: 20466290
  19. Factors associated with failed treatment: an analysis of 121,744 women embarking on their first IVF cycles.
    PLoS One. 2013 Dec 05;8(12):e82249 PMID: 24349236
  20. Maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology by infertility diagnosis: ovulatory dysfunction versus tubal obstruction.
    Fertil Steril. 2014 Apr;101(4):1019-25 PMID: 24484993
  21. Preservation of sperm of cancer patients: extent of use and pregnancy outcome in a tertiary infertility center.
    Asian J Androl. 2013 May;15(3):382-6 PMID: 23524529
  22. Male fertility preservation, where are we in 2014?
    Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 2014 May;75(2):115-7 PMID: 24793992
  23. Cryopreservation of human genetic material.
    Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Sep;1205:220-4 PMID: 20840276
  24. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using cryopreserved sperm from men with malignant neoplasm yields high pregnancy rates.
    Fertil Steril. 2008 Sep;90(3):557-63 PMID: 18692822
  25. Blastocyst transfer and gender: IVF versus ICSI.
    J Assist Reprod Genet. 2009 Aug;26(8):433-6 PMID: 19731005
  26. Sperm banking for fertility preservation: a 20-year experience.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Sep;170(1):177-82 PMID: 23870186
  27. Cryopreservation of sperm: indications, methods and results.
    J Urol. 2003 Oct;170(4 Pt 1):1079-84 PMID: 14501696
  28. The clinical relevance of sex selection techniques.
    Fertil Steril. 1989 Dec;52(6):891-905 PMID: 2687028
  29. Blastocyst embryo transfer is associated with a sex-ratio imbalance in favor of male offspring.
    Fertil Steril. 2007 Mar;87(3):519-23 PMID: 17118368
  30. Rates of postcancer parenthood.
    J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jan 20;27(3):321-2 PMID: 19075256
  31. Sperm banking for male cancer patients: social and semen profiles.
    Int Braz J Urol. 2009 Mar-Apr;35(2):190-7; discussion 197-8 PMID: 19409123
  32. The effect on human sex ratio at birth by assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures--an assessment of babies born following single embryo transfers, Australia and New Zealand, 2002-2006.
    BJOG. 2010 Dec;117(13):1628-34 PMID: 20875033
  33. Raw and test-thaw semen parameters after cryopreservation among men with newly diagnosed cancer.
    Fertil Steril. 2013 Feb;99(2):464-9 PMID: 23103020
  34. Male infertility in cancer patients: Review of the literature.
    Int J Urol. 2010 Apr;17(4):327-31 PMID: 20202000
  35. The effects of artificial gender imbalance. Science & Society Series on Sex and Science.
    EMBO Rep. 2012 Jun 01;13(6):487-92 PMID: 22584356
  36. Cancer statistics, 2014.
    CA Cancer J Clin. 2014 Jan-Feb;64(1):9-29 PMID: 24399786
  37. Sperm banking for male reproductive preservation: a 6-year retrospective multi-centre study in China.
    Asian J Androl. 2010 May;12(3):356-62 PMID: 20348941
Article Info
Journal
Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice
Abbr.
J Cancer Surviv
ISSN
1932-2267
Published
2015-06-00
Epub
2014-00-02
Pages
208-14
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
101307557
Subset
IM
Grants
Canadian Institutes of Health Research · SUR-103396 · Canada
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]