Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 25414159 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

A disadvantaged advantage in walkability: findings from socioeconomic and geographical analysis of national built environment data in the United States.

American journal of epidemiology ·Vol. 181 ·No. 1 ·2015-01-01 ·Pages 17-25

King KE, Clarke PJ

Abstract

Urban form-the structure of the built environment-can influence physical activity, yet little is known about how walkable design differs according to neighborhood sociodemographic composition. We studied how walkable urban form varies by neighborhood sociodemographic composition, region, and urbanicity across the United States. Using linear regression models and 2000-2001 US Census data, we investigated the relationship between 5 neighborhood census characteristics (income, education, racial/ethnic composition, age distribution, and sex) and 5 walkability indicators in almost 65,000 census tracts in 48 states and the District of Columbia. Data on the built environment were obtained from the RAND Corporation's (Santa Monica, California) Center for Population Health and Health Disparities (median block length, street segment, and node density) and the US Geological Survey's National Land Cover Database (proportion open space and proportion highly developed). Disadvantaged neighborhoods and those with more educated residents were more walkable (i.e., shorter block length, greater street node density, more developed land use, and higher density of street segments). However, tracts with a higher proportion of children and older adults were less walkable (fewer street nodes and lower density of street segments), after adjustment for region and level of urbanicity. Research and policy on the walkability-health link should give nuanced attention to the gap between persons living in walkable areas and those for whom walkability has the most to offer.

Keywords
built environment census tracts health disparities sociodemographic factors urban form walkability
MeSH Terms
Cities Environment Design Health Status Disparities Humans Residence Characteristics Socioeconomic Factors United States Urban Population Walking
Authors & Affiliations
2 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
King Katherine E
Clarke Philippa J
References (47)
47 references, click to expand
  1. Income disparities in perceived neighborhood built and social environment attributes.
    Health Place. 2011 Nov;17(6):1274-83 PMID: 21885324
  2. Traffic-related air pollution and socioeconomic status: a spatial autocorrelation study to assess environmental equity on a small-area scale.
    Epidemiology. 2009 Mar;20(2):223-30 PMID: 19142163
  3. Built environments and obesity in disadvantaged populations.
    Epidemiol Rev. 2009;31:7-20 PMID: 19589839
  4. Healthy neighborhoods: walkability and air pollution.
    Environ Health Perspect. 2009 Nov;117(11):1752-9 PMID: 20049128
  5. Mobility disability and the urban built environment.
    Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Sep 1;168(5):506-13 PMID: 18667526
  6. Targeting interventions for ethnic minority and low-income populations.
    Future Child. 2006 Spring;16(1):187-207 PMID: 16532664
  7. Neighborhood walkable urban form and C-reactive protein.
    Prev Med. 2013 Dec;57(6):850-4 PMID: 24096140
  8. Parks and recreation settings and active living: a review of associations with physical activity function and intensity.
    J Phys Act Health. 2008 Jul;5(4):619-32 PMID: 18648125
  9. [Social inequality and noise pollution by traffic in the living environment--an analysis by the German Federal Health Survey (Bundesgesundheitssurvey)].
    Gesundheitswesen. 2003 Jun;65(6):393-401 PMID: 12836130
  10. Availability of physical activity-related facilities and neighborhood demographic and socioeconomic characteristics: a national study.
    Am J Public Health. 2006 Sep;96(9):1676-80 PMID: 16873753
  11. The Changing Bases of Segregation in the United States.
    Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2009 Nov 1;626(1):null PMID: 24298193
  12. Child passenger safety.
    Pediatrics. 2011 Apr;127(4):788-93 PMID: 21422088
  13. Aircraft and road traffic noise and children's cognition and health: a cross-national study.
    Lancet. 2005 Jun 4-10;365(9475):1942-9 PMID: 15936421
  14. Density zoning and class segregation in U.S. metropolitan areas.
    Soc Sci Q. 2010;91(5):1123-143 PMID: 21117332
  15. Using objective and subjective measures of neighborhood greenness and accessible destinations for understanding walking trips and BMI in Seattle, Washington.
    Am J Health Promot. 2007 Mar-Apr;21(4 Suppl):371-9 PMID: 17465183
  16. Social capital and the built environment: the importance of walkable neighborhoods.
    Am J Public Health. 2003 Sep;93(9):1546-51 PMID: 12948978
  17. Resources for physical activity participation: does availability and accessibility differ by neighborhood socioeconomic status?
    Ann Behav Med. 2003 Spring;25(2):100-4 PMID: 12704011
  18. Cumulative cancer risk from air pollution in Houston: disparities in risk burden and social disadvantage.
    Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Jun 15;42(12):4312-22 PMID: 18605549
  19. Cognitive function in the community setting: the neighbourhood as a source of 'cognitive reserve'?
    J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Aug;66(8):730-6 PMID: 21515547
  20. Neighbourhood access to open spaces and the physical activity of residents: a national study.
    Prev Med. 2008 Sep;47(3):299-303 PMID: 18533242
  21. Are socially disadvantaged neighbourhoods deprived of health-related community resources?
    Int J Epidemiol. 2007 Apr;36(2):348-55 PMID: 17182634
  22. Attributes of environments supporting walking.
    Am J Health Promot. 2007 May-Jun;21(5):448-59 PMID: 17515010
  23. Negative life events vary by neighborhood and mediate the relation between neighborhood context and psychological well-being.
    PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e93539 PMID: 24714115
  24. THE EFFECT OF DENSITY ZONING ON RACIAL SEGREGATION IN U.S. URBAN AREAS.
    Urban Aff Rev Thousand Oaks Calif. 2009 Jul 1;44(6):779-806 PMID: 25009413
  25. Aggravating conditions: cynical hostility and neighborhood ambient stressors.
    Soc Sci Med. 2012 Dec;75(12):2258-66 PMID: 22995667
  26. Protective association between neighborhood walkability and depression in older men.
    J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Apr;55(4):526-33 PMID: 17397430
  27. Neighborhood disadvantage, disorder, and health.
    J Health Soc Behav. 2001 Sep;42(3):258-76 PMID: 11668773
  28. Inequality in the built environment underlies key health disparities in physical activity and obesity.
    Pediatrics. 2006 Feb;117(2):417-24 PMID: 16452361
  29. Housing and health: intersection of poverty and environmental exposures.
    Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1136:276-88 PMID: 18579887
  30. Walkability and safety around elementary schools economic and ethnic disparities.
    Am J Prev Med. 2008 Apr;34(4):282-90 PMID: 18374241
  31. A systematic review of the relation between long-term exposure to ambient air pollution and chronic diseases.
    Rev Environ Health. 2008 Oct-Dec;23(4):243-97 PMID: 19235364
  32. A national plan for physical activity: the enabling role of the built environment.
    J Phys Act Health. 2009 Nov;6 Suppl 2:S186-95 PMID: 20120128
  33. Food store availability and neighborhood characteristics in the United States.
    Prev Med. 2007 Mar;44(3):189-95 PMID: 16997358
  34. Jane Jacobs and 'The Need for Aged Buildings': Neighborhood Historical Development Pace and Community Social Relations.
    Urban Stud. 2013 Sep;50(12):null PMID: 24163485
  35. Environmental and policy interventions to promote physical activity.
    Am J Prev Med. 1998 Nov;15(4):379-97 PMID: 9838979
  36. Food environments and obesity--neighbourhood or nation?
    Int J Epidemiol. 2006 Feb;35(1):100-4 PMID: 16338945
  37. Chronic residential exposure to particulate matter air pollution and systemic inflammatory markers.
    Environ Health Perspect. 2009 Aug;117(8):1302-8 PMID: 19672412
  38. Potential strategies to eliminate built environment disparities for disadvantaged and vulnerable communities.
    Am J Public Health. 2011 Apr;101(4):587-95 PMID: 21389288
  39. Real noise from the urban environment: how ambient community noise affects health and what can be done about it.
    Am J Prev Med. 2009 Aug;37(2):167-71 PMID: 19589452
  40. Income and racial disparities in access to public parks and private recreation facilities.
    Am J Prev Med. 2008 Jan;34(1):9-15 PMID: 18083445
  41. Review of heat wave: social autopsy of disaster in Chicago.
    N Engl J Med. 2003 Feb 13;348(7):666-7 PMID: 12584383
  42. You are where you shop: grocery store locations, weight, and neighborhoods.
    Am J Prev Med. 2006 Jul;31(1):10-7 PMID: 16777537
  43. Measuring the built environment for physical activity: state of the science.
    Am J Prev Med. 2009 Apr;36(4 Suppl):S99-123.e12 PMID: 19285216
  44. Neighborhood environments: disparities in access to healthy foods in the U.S.
    Am J Prev Med. 2009 Jan;36(1):74-81 PMID: 18977112
  45. Built environment correlates of walking: a review.
    Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Jul;40(7 Suppl):S550-66 PMID: 18562973
  46. A spatial analysis of health-related resources in three diverse metropolitan areas.
    Health Place. 2010 Sep;16(5):885-92 PMID: 20478737
  47. Using policy and built environment interventions to improve public health.
    J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008 May-Jun;14(3):221-3 PMID: 18408545
Article Info
Journal
American journal of epidemiology
Abbr.
Am J Epidemiol
ISSN
1476-6256
Published
2015-01-01
Epub
2014-00-19
Pages
17-25
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
7910653
PMCID
PMC4334827
Subset
IM
Grants
NICHD NIH HHS · R24 HD041028 · United States
Corrections
CommentIn
CommentIn
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]