Abstract
Statisticians investigate new methods in simulations to evaluate their properties for future real data applications. Results are often presented in a number of figures, e.g., Trellis plots. We had conducted a simulation study on six statistical methods for estimating the treatment effect in binary outcome meta-analyses, where selection bias (e.g., publication bias) was suspected because of apparent funnel plot asymmetry. We varied five simulation parameters: true treatment effect, extent of selection, event proportion in control group, heterogeneity parameter, and number of studies in meta-analysis. In combination, this yielded a total number of 768 scenarios. To present all results using Trellis plots, 12 figures were needed. Choosing bias as criterion of interest, we present a 'nested loop plot', a diagram type that aims to have all simulation results in one plot. The idea was to bring all scenarios into a lexicographical order and arrange them consecutively on the horizontal axis of a plot, whereas the treatment effect estimate is presented on the vertical axis. The plot illustrates how parameters simultaneously influenced the estimate. It can be combined with a Trellis plot in a so-called hybrid plot. Nested loop plots may also be applied to other criteria such as the variance of estimation. The nested loop plot, similar to a time series graph, summarizes all information about the results of a simulation study with respect to a chosen criterion in one picture and provides a suitable alternative or an addition to Trellis plots.
MeSH Terms
Computer Simulation
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Humans
Meta-Analysis as Topic
Publication Bias
Regression Analysis
Selection Bias
Authors & Affiliations
2 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Rücker Gerta
Institute for Medical Biometry and Statistics, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Stefan-Meier-Strasse 26, 79104 Freiburg, Germany.
[email protected].
Schwarzer Guido
References (14)
14 references, click to expand
-
On the Assessment of Monte Carlo Error in Simulation-Based Statistical Analyses.
Am Stat. 2009 May 1;63(2):155-162
PMID: 22544972
-
What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data.
Stat Med. 2004 May 15;23(9):1351-75
PMID: 15116347
-
A test for publication bias in meta-analysis with sparse binary data.
Stat Med. 2007 Feb 20;26(4):721-33
PMID: 16755545
-
Treatment-effect estimates adjusted for small-study effects via a limit meta-analysis.
Biostatistics. 2011 Jan;12(1):122-42
PMID: 20656692
-
Combining the evidence using stable weights.
Res Synth Methods. 2010 Jul;1(3-4):284-96
PMID: 26061472
-
A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints.
Stat Med. 2006 Oct 30;25(20):3443-57
PMID: 16345038
-
Arcsine test for publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
Stat Med. 2008 Feb 28;27(5):746-63
PMID: 17592831
-
Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis.
JAMA. 2006 Feb 8;295(6):676-80
PMID: 16467236
-
Assessment of regression-based methods to adjust for publication bias through a comprehensive simulation study.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:2
PMID: 19138428
-
Why add anything to nothing? The arcsine difference as a measure of treatment effect in meta-analysis with zero cells.
Stat Med. 2009 Feb 28;28(5):721-38
PMID: 19072749
-
The design of simulation studies in medical statistics.
Stat Med. 2006 Dec 30;25(24):4279-92
PMID: 16947139
-
Detecting and adjusting for small-study effects in meta-analysis.
Biom J. 2011 Mar;53(2):351-68
PMID: 21374698
-
Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytical methods with rare events.
Stat Med. 2007 Jan 15;26(1):53-77
PMID: 16596572
-
Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: an overview of the randomized trials.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1985 Mar-Apr;27(5):335-71
PMID: 2858114