Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 25645414 Published · ppublish English Comparative Study Evaluation Study Journal Article

Comparison of symmetric hemodialysis catheters using computational fluid dynamics.

Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR ·Vol. 26 ·No. 2 ·2015-02-00 ·页码 252-9.e2

Clark TW, Isu G, Gallo D, Verdonck P, Morbiducci U

Abstract

Symmetric-tip dialysis catheters have become alternative devices because of low access recirculation and ease of tip positioning. Flow characteristics of three symmetric catheters were compared based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) as they relate to catheter function. In Palindrome, GlidePath, and VectorFlow catheters, a computational fluid dynamics-based approach was used to assess (i) regions of flow separation, which are prone to thrombus development; (ii) shear-induced platelet activation potency; (iii) recirculation; and (iv) venous outflow deflection. A steady-state, laminar flow model simulated catheter tip position within the superior vena cava. Catheter performance was investigated at high hemodialysis flow rate (400 mL/min). Blood was assumed as a Newtonian fluid. Wide regions of flow separation downstream of the Palindrome side slot and close to the distal tip were observed in forward and reversed line configurations. Geometric asymmetry of the distal guide wire aperture of the GlidePath catheter produced the highest levels of inverted velocity flow when run in reversed configuration. The lowest mean shear-induced platelet activation was exhibited by GlidePath and VectorFlow catheters; the Palindrome catheter exhibited 152% higher overall platelet activation potency. All catheters were associated with a recirculation close to zero; the helically contoured lumens of the VectorFlow catheter produced the greatest amount of deflection of venous flow away from the arterial lumen. The VectorFlow catheter produced less shear-induced platelet activation than the Palindrome catheter and less flow separation than the Palindrome and GlidePath catheters irrespective of line configuration. These findings have potential implications for differences in thrombogenic risk during clinical performance of these catheters.

MeSH 主题词
Blood Flow Velocity/physiology Blood Pressure/physiology Central Venous Catheters Computer Simulation Equipment Failure Analysis Humans Models, Cardiovascular Platelet Activation/physiology Prosthesis Design Renal Dialysis/instrumentation Rheology/methods Shear Strength/physiology Vena Cava, Superior/physiology
作者与单位
共 5 位作者,点击展开单位 / ORCID
Clark Timothy W I
Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 39th and Market Sts., Philadelphia, PA 19104. Electronic address: [email protected].
Isu Giuseppe
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Gallo Diego
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Verdonck Pascal
Institute Biomedical Technology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Morbiducci Umberto
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Article Info
Journal
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR
Abbr.
J Vasc Interv Radiol
ISSN
1535-7732
Corresponding email
Published
2015-02-00
页码
252-9.e2
Language
English
Country/Region
United States
NLM ID
9203369
勘误 / 撤稿关联
CommentIn
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]