Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 26406148 Published · ppublish English Clinical Trial, Phase III Comparative Study Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Nivolumab versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma.

The New England journal of medicine ·Vol. 373 ·No. 19 ·2015-11-05 ·Pages 1803-13

Motzer RJ, Escudier B, McDermott DF, George S, Hammers HJ, Srinivas S, Tykodi SS, Sosman JA, Procopio G, Plimack ER, Castellano D, Choueiri TK, Gurney H, Donskov F, Bono P, Wagstaff J, Gauler TC, Ueda T, Tomita Y, Schutz FA, Kollmannsberger C, Larkin J, Ravaud A, Simon JS, Xu LA, Waxman IM, Sharma P, CheckMate 025 Investigators

Abstract

Nivolumab, a programmed death 1 (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitor, was associated with encouraging overall survival in uncontrolled studies involving previously treated patients with advanced renal-cell carcinoma. This randomized, open-label, phase 3 study compared nivolumab with everolimus in patients with renal-cell carcinoma who had received previous treatment. A total of 821 patients with advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma for which they had received previous treatment with one or two regimens of antiangiogenic therapy were randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to receive 3 mg of nivolumab per kilogram of body weight intravenously every 2 weeks or a 10-mg everolimus tablet orally once daily. The primary end point was overall survival. The secondary end points included the objective response rate and safety. The median overall survival was 25.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.8 to not estimable) with nivolumab and 19.6 months (95% CI, 17.6 to 23.1) with everolimus. The hazard ratio for death with nivolumab versus everolimus was 0.73 (98.5% CI, 0.57 to 0.93; P=0.002), which met the prespecified criterion for superiority (P≤0.0148). The objective response rate was greater with nivolumab than with everolimus (25% vs. 5%; odds ratio, 5.98 [95% CI, 3.68 to 9.72]; P<0.001). The median progression-free survival was 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 5.4) with nivolumab and 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 5.5) with everolimus (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.03; P=0.11). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 19% of the patients receiving nivolumab and in 37% of the patients receiving everolimus; the most common event with nivolumab was fatigue (in 2% of the patients), and the most common event with everolimus was anemia (in 8%). Among patients with previously treated advanced renal-cell carcinoma, overall survival was longer and fewer grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred with nivolumab than with everolimus. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; CheckMate 025 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01668784.).

MeSH Terms
Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects,therapeutic use Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects,therapeutic use Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy,mortality Everolimus Female Humans Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy,mortality Male Middle Aged Nivolumab Quality of Life Sirolimus/adverse effects,analogs & derivatives,therapeutic use Survival Analysis Young Adult
Chemicals
Antibodies, Monoclonal Antineoplastic Agents Nivolumab Everolimus Sirolimus
Authors & Affiliations
28 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Motzer Robert J
From Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (R.J.M.), and Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo (S.G.) - both in New York; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif (B.E.), and Bordeaux University Hospital, Hôpital Saint André, Bordeaux (A.R.) - both in France; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.F.M.) and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School (T.K.C.) - all in Boston; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore (H.J.H.); Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA (S.S.); University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (S.S.T.); Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (J.A.S.); Fondazione Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan (G.P.); Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia (E.R.P.); Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre, Madrid (D.C.); Westmead Hospital and Macquarie University, Sydney (H.G.); Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (F.D.); Helsinki University Central Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki (P.B.); South West Wales Cancer Institute and Swansea University College of Medicine, Swansea (J.W.), and Royal Marsden Hospital, London (J.L.) - both in the United Kingdom; University Hospital Essen of University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany (T.C.G.); Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba (T.U.), and Niigata University, Niigata (Y.T.) - both in Japan; Hospital Sao Jose, Beneficencia Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo (F.A.S.); British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada (C.K.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville (J.S.S., I.M.W.) and Hopewell (L.-A.X.) - both in New Jersey; and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston (P.S.).
Escudier Bernard
McDermott David F
George Saby
Hammers Hans J
Srinivas Sandhya
Tykodi Scott S
Sosman Jeffrey A
Procopio Giuseppe
Plimack Elizabeth R
Castellano Daniel
Choueiri Toni K
Gurney Howard
Donskov Frede
Bono Petri
Wagstaff John
Gauler Thomas C
Ueda Takeshi
Tomita Yoshihiko
Schutz Fabio A
Kollmannsberger Christian
Larkin James
Ravaud Alain
Simon Jason S
Xu Li-An
Waxman Ian M
Sharma Padmanee
CheckMate 025 Investigators
Investigators
144 investigators, click to expand
Korbenfeld E
Palazzo F S
Recondo G
Chacon M
Richardet M E
Susana M
Pook D
Toner G
Gurney H
Davis I
Pittman K B
Kavina A
Schmidinger M
Loidl W
Schallier D
Machiels J-P
Schoffski P
Rottey S
Dzik C
Schutz F
Franke F A
Kollmannsberger C K
Heng D
Knox J
Wood L
Basappa N
Zalewski P
Ghedira S
Miller W
Melichar B
Kubala E
Prausova J
Donskov F
Jensen N V
Geertsen P
Bono P
Ravaud A
Escudier B
Chevreau C
Rolland F
Gravis G
Tourani J-M
Geoffrois L
Oudard S
Heidenreich A
Imkamp F
Bedke J
Meiler J
Retz M
Goebell P
Pahernik S
Bamias A
Papazsis K
McCaffrey J A
McDermott R
Neumann A
Berger R
Neiman V
Santoro A
Sternberg C
Roila F
Procopio G
Maio M
Bracarda S
De Giorgi U
Hongo F
Kimura G
Kanayama H
Kitamura H
Kume H
Uemura H
Yonese J
Tanabe K
Tatsugami K
Eto M
Oya M
Saito M
Uemura M
Yao M
Shinohara N
Yamaguchi R
Fukasawa S
Kato T
Sugiyama T
Obara W
Heinrich D
Straume O
Szcylik C
Slomian G
Wojcik-Tomaszewska J
Tomczak P
Zdrojowy R
Volovat C
Lungulescu D
Sinescu I
Poddubskaya E
Karlov P
Matveev V
Suarez C
Castellano D
Puente J
Arranz J A
Perez Gracia J L
Del Muro X Garcia
Jellvert A
Harmenberg U
Wagstaff J
Gore M
Nathan P
Eisen T
Alva A
Amin A
Carthon B
McDermott D
Quinn D
Vaena D
Lam E
Plimack E
Millard F
Quddus F
Beltran H
Drabkin H
Hammers H-J
Brugarolas J
Clark J
Hainsworth J
Sarantopoulos J
Sosman J
Beck J T
Fong L
Fishman M
Harrison M
Dawson N
Sharma P
Figlin R
Motzer R
George S
Srinivas S
Tykodi S
Kuzel T
Logan T
Olencki T
Vaishampayan U
Voelzke W
References (22)
22 references, click to expand
  1. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.
    Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86 PMID: 25220842
  2. Development and validation of a scale to measure disease-related symptoms of kidney cancer.
    Value Health. 2007 Jul-Aug;10(4):285-93 PMID: 17645683
  3. Tumor B7-H1 is associated with poor prognosis in renal cell carcinoma patients with long-term follow-up.
    Cancer Res. 2006 Apr 1;66(7):3381-5 PMID: 16585157
  4. A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials.
    Biometrics. 1979 Sep;35(3):549-56 PMID: 497341
  5. Phase I study of single-agent anti-programmed death-1 (MDX-1106) in refractory solid tumors: safety, clinical activity, pharmacodynamics, and immunologic correlates.
    J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jul 1;28(19):3167-75 PMID: 20516446
  6. Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer.
    N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 28;366(26):2443-54 PMID: 22658127
  7. Prognostic factors for survival in previously treated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
    J Clin Oncol. 2004 Feb 1;22(3):454-63 PMID: 14752067
  8. Anti-programmed death-1 and anti-programmed death-ligand 1 antibodies in cancer therapy.
    Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2013 Jun;13(6):847-61 PMID: 23421934
  9. Costimulatory B7-H1 in renal cell carcinoma patients: Indicator of tumor aggressiveness and potential therapeutic target.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Dec 7;101(49):17174-9 PMID: 15569934
  10. Molecular mechanisms of T-cell tolerance.
    Immunol Rev. 2011 May;241(1):133-44 PMID: 21488895
  11. Nivolumab for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results of a Randomized Phase II Trial.
    J Clin Oncol. 2015 May 1;33(13):1430-7 PMID: 25452452
  12. Axitinib versus sorafenib as second-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: overall survival analysis and updated results from a randomised phase 3 trial.
    Lancet Oncol. 2013 May;14(6):552-62 PMID: 23598172
  13. Temsirolimus, interferon alfa, or both for advanced renal-cell carcinoma.
    N Engl J Med. 2007 May 31;356(22):2271-81 PMID: 17538086
  14. Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation.
    N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 22;372(4):320-30 PMID: 25399552
  15. Current and future systemic treatments for renal cell carcinoma.
    Semin Cancer Biol. 2013 Feb;23(1):38-45 PMID: 22705280
  16. Cytokines in cancer immunotherapy.
    Cancers (Basel). 2011 Oct 13;3(4):3856-93 PMID: 24213115
  17. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).
    Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47 PMID: 19097774
  18. Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.
    Ann Oncol. 2014 Sep;25 Suppl 3:iii49-56 PMID: 25210086
  19. Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
    N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 9;373(2):123-35 PMID: 26028407
  20. Karnofsky performance status revisited: reliability, validity, and guidelines.
    J Clin Oncol. 1984 Mar;2(3):187-93 PMID: 6699671
  21. Programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 and tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T lymphocytes are prognostic factors of human ovarian cancer.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Feb 27;104(9):3360-5 PMID: 17360651
  22. New agents in renal cell carcinoma.
    Target Oncol. 2014 Sep;9(3):183-93 PMID: 24243495
Article Info
Journal
The New England journal of medicine
Abbr.
N Engl J Med
ISSN
1533-4406
Published
2015-11-05
Epub
2015-00-25
Pages
1803-13
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
0255562
PMCID
PMC5719487
Subset
IM
Grants
NCI NIH HHS · P30 CA008748 · United States
Databases
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT01668784
Corrections
CommentIn
CommentIn
CommentIn
CommentIn
CommentIn
CommentIn
CommentIn
CommentIn
CommentIn
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]