Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 27775821 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

An assessment of benefits and harms of hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in patients with cirrhosis.

Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) ·Vol. 65 ·No. 4 ·2017-00-00 ·Pages 1196-1205

Atiq O, Tiro J, Yopp AC, Muffler A, Marrero JA, Parikh ND, Murphy C, McCallister K, Singal AG

Abstract

Although surveillance ultrasound and alpha fetoprotein (AFP) tests have minimal direct harm, downstream harms from follow-up tests must be weighed against surveillance benefits when determining the value of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening programs. Our study's aims were to characterize prevalence and correlates of surveillance benefits and harms in cirrhosis patients undergoing HCC surveillance. We conducted a retrospective cohort study among patients with cirrhosis followed at a safety-net health system between July 2010 and July 2013. We recorded surveillance-related benefits, defined as early tumor detection and curative treatment, and surveillance-related physical harms, defined as computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans, biopsies, or other procedures performed for false-positive or indeterminate surveillance results. Sociodemographic and clinical correlates of surveillance harms were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression. We identified 680 patients with cirrhosis, of whom 78 (11.5%) developed HCC during the 3-year study period. Of the 48 (61.5%) HCCs identified by surveillance, 43.8% were detected by ultrasound, 31.2% by AFP, and 25.0% by both surveillance tests. Surveillance-detected patients had a higher proportion of early HCC (70.2% vs. 40.0%; P = 0.009), with no difference in tumor stage between ultrasound- and AFP-detected tumors (P = 0.53). Surveillance-related physical harms were observed in 187 (27.5%) patients, with a higher proportion of ultrasound-related harm than AFP-related harm (22.8% vs. 11.4%; P < 0.001). Surveillance-related harms were associated with elevated ALT (odds ratio [OR], 1.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-2.76), thrombocytopenia (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.26-3.38), and hepatology subspecialty care (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.09-2.42). Over one fourth of patients with cirrhosis experience physical harm for false-positive or indeterminate surveillance tests-more often related to ultrasound than AFP. Interventions are needed to reduce surveillance-related harm to increase the value of HCC screening programs in clinical practice. (Hepatology 2017;65:1196-1205).

MeSH Terms
Adult Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnosis Cell Transformation, Neoplastic Cohort Studies Early Detection of Cancer/methods Female Humans Liver Cirrhosis/diagnosis Liver Function Tests Liver Neoplasms/diagnosis Male Mass Screening/methods Middle Aged Multivariate Analysis Odds Ratio Prognosis Retrospective Studies Risk Assessment Ultrasonography, Doppler alpha-Fetoproteins/metabolism
Chemicals
alpha-Fetoproteins
Authors & Affiliations
9 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Atiq Omair
Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health Hospital System, Dallas, TX.
Tiro Jasmin
Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. | Department of Clinical Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Yopp Adam C
Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; and Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Muffler Adam
Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health Hospital System, Dallas, TX.
Marrero Jorge A
Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health Hospital System, Dallas, TX.
Parikh Neehar D
Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; and Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Murphy Caitlin
Department of Clinical Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
McCallister Katharine
Department of Clinical Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Singal Amit G
Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health Hospital System, Dallas, TX. | Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. | Department of Clinical Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
References (33)
33 references, click to expand
  1. A new laboratory-based algorithm to predict development of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with hepatitis C and cirrhosis.
    Gastroenterology. 2014 May;146(5):1249-55.e1 PMID: 24462733
  2. Diagnosis of hepatic nodules 20 mm or smaller in cirrhosis: Prospective validation of the noninvasive diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Hepatology. 2008 Jan;47(1):97-104 PMID: 18069697
  3. Predictors of adequate ultrasound quality for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in patients with cirrhosis.
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Jan;45(1):169-177 PMID: 27862091
  4. Establishment of a multidisciplinary hepatocellular carcinoma clinic is associated with improved clinical outcome.
    Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Apr;21(4):1287-95 PMID: 24318095
  5. Serum alpha-fetoprotein levels in patients with advanced hepatitis C: results from the HALT-C Trial.
    J Hepatol. 2005 Sep;43(3):434-41 PMID: 16136646
  6. Factors that affect accuracy of α-fetoprotein test in detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis.
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 May;12(5):870-7 PMID: 24095974
  7. Test characteristics of alpha-fetoprotein for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with hepatitis C. A systematic review and critical analysis.
    Ann Intern Med. 2003 Jul 1;139(1):46-50 PMID: 12834318
  8. Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations.
    N Engl J Med. 1998 Apr 16;338(16):1089-96 PMID: 9545356
  9. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States.
    Cancer Res. 2014 Jun 1;74(11):2913-21 PMID: 24840647
  10. Recent advances in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2010 May;26(3):189-95 PMID: 20224395
  11. Liver biopsy.
    Hepatology. 2009 Mar;49(3):1017-44 PMID: 19243014
  12. Use of surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma among patients with cirrhosis in the United States.
    Hepatology. 2010 Jul;52(1):132-41 PMID: 20578139
  13. Harms of colonoscopy in a colorectal cancer screening programme with faecal occult blood test: a population-based cohort study.
    Dig Liver Dis. 2013 Jun;45(6):474-80 PMID: 23414583
  14. Meta-analysis: surveillance with ultrasound for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis.
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Jul;30(1):37-47 PMID: 19392863
  15. Practice patterns and attitudes of primary care providers and barriers to surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis.
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Apr;13(4):791-8.e1 PMID: 25019694
  16. Factors that affect efficacy of ultrasound surveillance for early stage hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis.
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Nov;12(11):1927-33.e2 PMID: 24582947
  17. Hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance: a national survey of current practices in the USA.
    Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Dec;59(12 ):3073-7 PMID: 25027206
  18. Quantification of harms in cancer screening trials: literature review.
    BMJ. 2013 Sep 16;347:f5334 PMID: 24041703
  19. The diagnostic and economic impact of contrast imaging techniques in the diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis.
    Gut. 2010 May;59(5):638-44 PMID: 19951909
  20. Use of administrative claims data for identifying patients with cirrhosis.
    J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013 May-Jun;47(5):e50-4 PMID: 23090041
  21. Utilization of hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance among American patients: a systematic review.
    J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jul;27(7):861-7 PMID: 22215266
  22. Effectiveness of hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in patients with cirrhosis.
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 May;21(5):793-9 PMID: 22374994
  23. A value framework for cancer screening: advice for high-value care from the American College of Physicians.
    Ann Intern Med. 2015 May 19;162(10):712-7 PMID: 25984846
  24. Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma at advanced stages among patients in the HALT-C trial: where did surveillance fail?
    Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Mar;108(3):425-32 PMID: 23337478
  25. Alphafetoprotein: an obituary.
    J Hepatol. 2001 Apr;34(4):603-5 PMID: 11394662
  26. Population-based fecal occult blood screening for colon cancer: will the benefits outweigh the harm?
    CMAJ. 2000 Sep 5;163(5):545-6; discussion 547 PMID: 11006766
  27. Hepatocellular carcinoma tumour markers: current role and expectations.
    Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct;28(5):843-53 PMID: 25260312
  28. Early detection, curative treatment, and survival rates for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in patients with cirrhosis: a meta-analysis.
    PLoS Med. 2014 Apr 01;11(4):e1001624 PMID: 24691105
  29. Diagnostic delays are common among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
    J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015 May;13(5):543-9 PMID: 25964640
  30. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of focal liver lesions: techniques, diagnostic accuracy and complications. A retrospective study on 2091 biopsies.
    J Hepatol. 1990 Nov;11(3):344-8 PMID: 2290025
  31. Screening for hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic liver disease: a systematic review.
    Ann Intern Med. 2014 Aug 19;161(4):261-9 PMID: 24934699
  32. Racial, social, and clinical determinants of hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance.
    Am J Med. 2015 Jan;128(1):90.e1-7 PMID: 25116425
  33. EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma.
    J Hepatol. 2012 Apr;56(4):908-43 PMID: 22424438
Article Info
Journal
Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)
Abbr.
Hepatology
ISSN
1527-3350
Published
2017-00-00
Epub
2016-00-19
Pages
1196-1205
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
8302946
PMCID
PMC5659110
Subset
IM
Grants
AHRQ HHS · R24 HS022418 · United States
Corrections
CommentIn
CommentIn
CommentIn
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]