主页 文献库文献详情
PMID: 27865784 已发表 · aheadofprint 英语

A Comparison of Cell-Free DNA Isolation Kits: Isolation and Quantification of Cell-Free DNA in Plasma.

Sorber Laure, Zwaenepoel Karen, Deschoolmeester Vanessa, Roeyen Geert, Lardon Filip, Rolfo Christian, Pauwels Patrick

摘要

The analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) as a sensitive biomarker for cancer diagnosis and monitoring has resulted in a need for efficient and standardized cfDNA isolation. In this study, we compared the isolation efficiency of the QIAamp circulating nucleic acid kit (QIA) with four other cfDNA isolation kits: the PME free-circulating DNA Extraction Kit (PME), the Maxwell RSC ccfDNA Plasma Kit (RSC), the EpiQuick Circulating Cell-Free DNA Isolation Kit (EQ), and two consecutive versions of the NEXTprep-Mag cfDNA Isolation Kit (NpM). cfDNA was isolated from 10 plasma samples, of which five contained KRAS mutated cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA). Digital droplet PCR was used to quantify the total cfDNA concentration as well as the KRAS mutated ctDNA fraction. cfDNA integrity was assessed with real-time quantitative PCR. The QIA and the RSC kits displayed similar isolation efficiencies of both KRAS mutated ctDNA and nonmutated cfDNA, whereas the yield generated by the PME and NpM kits was significantly lower. Real-time quantitative PCR indicated the presence of digital droplet PCR inhibiting agents in the eluates of the NpM and EQ kits. To conclude, this study presents two highly efficient isolation kits for cfDNA isolation, of which the RSC kit has the advantage of a fully automated protocol over the labor-intensive QIA kit.

文献信息
期刊
The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD
期刊简称
J Mol Diagn
发表日期
0000-00-00
收录日期
2016-11-20
更新日期
2016-11-21
语言
英语
国家/地区
United States
NLM ID
100893612
分析服务
分析服务

联系地址

山东省济南市章丘区文博路2号

齐鲁师范学院 genelibs生信实验室

山东省济南市高新区舜华路750号

大学科技园北区F座4单元2楼

电话: 0531-88819269

微信公众号

关注微信订阅号,实时查看信息,关注医学生物学动态。


商务邮箱

E-mail: [email protected]