Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 29268424 Published · ppublish English Editorial

Using the confidence interval confidently.

Journal of thoracic disease ·Vol. 9 ·No. 10 ·2017-10-00 ·Pages 4125-4130

Hazra A

Abstract

Biomedical research is seldom done with entire populations but rather with samples drawn from a population. Although we work with samples, our goal is to describe and draw inferences regarding the underlying population. It is possible to use a sample statistic and estimates of error in the sample to get a fair idea of the population parameter, not as a single value, but as a range of values. This range is the confidence interval (CI) which is estimated on the basis of a desired confidence level. Calculation of the CI of a sample statistic takes the general form: CI = Point estimate ± Margin of error, where the margin of error is given by the product of a critical value (z) derived from the standard normal curve and the standard error of point estimate. Calculation of the standard error varies depending on whether the sample statistic of interest is a mean, proportion, odds ratio (OR), and so on. The factors affecting the width of the CI include the desired confidence level, the sample size and the variability in the sample. Although the 95% CI is most often used in biomedical research, a CI can be calculated for any level of confidence. A 99% CI will be wider than 95% CI for the same sample. Conflict between clinical importance and statistical significance is an important issue in biomedical research. Clinical importance is best inferred by looking at the effect size, that is how much is the actual change or difference. However, statistical significance in terms of P only suggests whether there is any difference in probability terms. Use of the CI supplements the P value by providing an estimate of actual clinical effect. Of late, clinical trials are being designed specifically as superiority, non-inferiority or equivalence studies. The conclusions from these alternative trial designs are based on CI values rather than the P value from intergroup comparison.

Keywords
Confidence interval (CI) P value clinical significance confidence level statistical inference
Authors & Affiliations
1 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Hazra Avijit
Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Kolkata, India.
Conflict of Interest

Conflicts of Interest: The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

References (6)
6 references, click to expand
  1. Confidence intervals and p-values in clinical decision making.
    Acta Paediatr. 2008 Aug;97(8):1004-7 PMID: 18462462
  2. Superiority, equivalence, and non-inferiority trials.
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2008;66(2):150-4 PMID: 18537788
  3. P value interpretations and considerations.
    J Thorac Dis. 2016 Sep;8(9):E928-E931 PMID: 27747028
  4. Measurement variability and confidence intervals in medicine: why should radiologists care?
    Radiology. 2003 Feb;226(2):297-301 PMID: 12563116
  5. Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals.
    Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Oct;21(5):1157-64 PMID: 24420726
  6. Why we need confidence intervals.
    World J Surg. 2005 May;29(5):554-6 PMID: 15827844
Article Info
Journal
Journal of thoracic disease
Abbr.
J Thorac Dis
ISSN
2072-1439
Published
2017-10-00
Pages
4125-4130
Language
English
Region
China
NLM ID
101533916
PMCID
PMC5723800
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]