Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 30203115 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Real-World Variability in the Prediction of Intracranial Aneurysm Wall Shear Stress: The 2015 International Aneurysm CFD Challenge.

Cardiovascular engineering and technology ·Vol. 9 ·No. 4 ·2018-00-00 ·页码 544-564

Valen-Sendstad K, Bergersen AW, Shimogonya Y, Goubergrits L, Bruening J, Pallares J, Cito S, Piskin S, Pekkan K, Geers AJ, Larrabide I, Rapaka S, Mihalef V, Fu W, Qiao A, Jain K, Roller S, Mardal KA, Kamakoti R, Spirka T, Ashton N, Revell A, Aristokleous N, Houston JG, Tsuji M, Ishida F, Menon PG, Browne LD, Broderick S, Shojima M, Koizumi S, Barbour M, Aliseda A, Morales HG, Lefèvre T, Hodis S, Al-Smadi YM, Tran JS, Marsden AL, Vaippummadhom S, Einstein GA, Brown AG, Debus K, Niizuma K, Rashad S, Sugiyama SI, Owais Khan M, Updegrove AR, Shadden SC, Cornelissen BMW, Majoie CBLM, Berg P, Saalfield S, Kono K, Steinman DA

Abstract

Image-based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is widely used to predict intracranial aneurysm wall shear stress (WSS), particularly with the goal of improving rupture risk assessment. Nevertheless, concern has been expressed over the variability of predicted WSS and inconsistent associations with rupture. Previous challenges, and studies from individual groups, have focused on individual aspects of the image-based CFD pipeline. The aim of this Challenge was to quantify the total variability of the whole pipeline. 3D rotational angiography image volumes of five middle cerebral artery aneurysms were provided to participants, who were free to choose their segmentation methods, boundary conditions, and CFD solver and settings. Participants were asked to fill out a questionnaire about their solution strategies and experience with aneurysm CFD, and provide surface distributions of WSS magnitude, from which we objectively derived a variety of hemodynamic parameters. A total of 28 datasets were submitted, from 26 teams with varying levels of self-assessed experience. Wide variability of segmentations, CFD model extents, and inflow rates resulted in interquartile ranges of sac average WSS up to 56%, which reduced to < 30% after normalizing by parent artery WSS. Sac-maximum WSS and low shear area were more variable, while rank-ordering of cases by low or high shear showed only modest consensus among teams. Experience was not a significant predictor of variability. Wide variability exists in the prediction of intracranial aneurysm WSS. While segmentation and CFD solver techniques may be difficult to standardize across groups, our findings suggest that some of the variability in image-based CFD could be reduced by establishing guidelines for model extents, inflow rates, and blood properties, and by encouraging the reporting of normalized hemodynamic parameters.

Keywords
Intracranial aneurysm Patient-specific modelling Rupture risk Uncertainty quantification Wall shear stress
MeSH 主题词
Blood Flow Velocity Cerebral Angiography/methods Cerebrovascular Circulation Hemodynamics Humans Imaging, Three-Dimensional Intracranial Aneurysm/diagnostic imaging,physiopathology Middle Cerebral Artery/diagnostic imaging,physiopathology Models, Cardiovascular Patient-Specific Modeling Predictive Value of Tests Prognosis Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted Regional Blood Flow Reproducibility of Results Stress, Mechanical
作者与单位
共 55 位作者,点击展开单位 / ORCID
Valen-Sendstad Kristian
Simula Research Laboratory and Center for Cardiological Innovation, Lysaker, Norway.
Bergersen Aslak W
Simula Research Laboratory and Center for Cardiological Innovation, Lysaker, Norway. | University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Shimogonya Yuji
Nihon University, Tokyo, Japan.
Goubergrits Leonid
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Bruening Jan
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Pallares Jordi
Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain.
Cito Salvatore
Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain.
Piskin Senol
University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Pekkan Kerem
Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Geers Arjan J
Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
Larrabide Ignacio
Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Rapaka Saikiran
Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc., Malvern, PA, USA.
Mihalef Viorel
Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc., Malvern, PA, USA.
Fu Wenyu
Beijing Union University, Beijing, China.
Qiao Aike
Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China.
Jain Kartik
Simula Research Laboratory and Center for Cardiological Innovation, Lysaker, Norway. | University of Siegen, Siegen, Germany. | University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Roller Sabine
University of Siegen, Siegen, Germany.
Mardal Kent-Andre
Simula Research Laboratory and Center for Cardiological Innovation, Lysaker, Norway. | University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Kamakoti Ramji
Dassault Systemes, Paris, France.
Spirka Thomas
Simpleware Software Solutions, Exeter, UK.
Ashton Neil
University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Revell Alistair
University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Aristokleous Nicolas
University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Houston J Graeme
University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Tsuji Masanori
Mie Chuo Medical Center, Tsu, Japan.
Ishida Fujimaro
Mie Chuo Medical Center, Tsu, Japan.
Menon Prahlad G
University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Browne Leonard D
University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Broderick Stephen
University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Shojima Masaaki
University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Koizumi Satoshi
University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Barbour Michael
University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Aliseda Alberto
University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Morales Hernán G
Medisys - Philips Research Paris, Paris, France.
Lefèvre Thierry
Medisys - Philips Research Paris, Paris, France.
Hodis Simona
Texas A&M University - Kingsville, Kingsville, TX, USA.
Al-Smadi Yahia M
Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Tran Justin S
Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Marsden Alison L
Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Vaippummadhom Sreeja
EinNel Technlogies, Chennai, India.
Einstein G Albert
EinNel Technlogies, Chennai, India.
Brown Alistair G
Siemens PLM Software, Plano, TX, USA.
Debus Kristian
Siemens PLM Software, Plano, TX, USA.
Niizuma Kuniyasu
Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Rashad Sherif
Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Sugiyama Shin-Ichiro
Kohnan Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
Owais Khan M
University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Updegrove Adam R
University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Shadden Shawn C
University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Cornelissen Bart M W
Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Majoie Charles B L M
Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Berg Philipp
University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Saalfield Sylvia
University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Kono Kenichi
Wakayama Rosai Hospital, Wakayama, Japan.
Steinman David A ORCID
University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. [email protected].
Article Info
Journal
Cardiovascular engineering and technology
Abbr.
Cardiovasc Eng Technol
ISSN
1869-4098
Corresponding email
Published
2018-00-00
电子出版
2018-00-10
页码
544-564
Language
English
Country/Region
United States
NLM ID
101531846
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]