Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 31767229 Published · ppublish English Journal Article

Dispersion modeling in pore networks: A comparison of common pore-scale models and alternative approaches.

Journal of contaminant hydrology ·Vol. 228 ·2020-01-00 ·页码 103578

Sadeghi MA, Agnaou M, Barralet J, Gostick J

Abstract

Mass transfer in porous media resulting from dispersion occurs in a wide variety of applications such as water treatment, flow batteries, flow in aquifers, enhanced oil recovery, and packed-bed reactors. The underlying mechanisms of dispersion are the molecular diffusion superimposed on the advective transport induced by the fluid flow. Modeling dispersion in pore networks can be performed at a much lower computational cost compared to that in direct numerical simulations (DNS) such as finite element or the lattice Boltzmann methods, so it can be regarded as a suitable alternative provided its accuracy is sufficient. The most common approach to model dispersion in network models is based on the first-order upwind scheme, despite its known limitations in terms of accuracy for certain flow and transport regimes. In this study, three alternative pore-scale models for dispersion, which are more accurate than the existing ones, were derived and tested in pore network simulations. These models were adopted from the CFD literature and are based on a spatial discretization of the advection-diffusion equation using the hybrid and power-law finite difference schemes and the exact solution of the one-dimensional advection-diffusion equation. Finally, considering dispersion problems over arbitrary porous structures, consisting of stick-and-ball geometries, and different flow and mass transfer arrangements, the developed models were validated. Validation was carried-out through comparisons between results obtained with DNS, using a finite element solver, and those from pore network simulations. It is shown that under a wide range of dispersion regimes (up to the onset of the dispersion power-law regime), the relative error (with respect to DNS results) introduced by the power-law and exact solution-based models is consistently below 1%, whereas the use of the upwind scheme leads to >10% of relative error, depending on the dispersion regime. All the dispersion models developed in this study were implemented as part of the open-source network modeling package, OpenPNM.

Keywords
Advection-diffusion Dispersion OpenPNM Pore network modeling Pore-scale modeling Porous media flow
MeSH 主题词
Diffusion Porosity Water Purification
作者与单位
共 4 位作者,点击展开单位 / ORCID
Sadeghi Mohammad Amin
Department of Chemical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Agnaou Mehrez
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Barralet Jake
Department of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Gostick Jeff
Department of Chemical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada. Electronic address: [email protected].
Article Info
Journal
Journal of contaminant hydrology
Abbr.
J Contam Hydrol
ISSN
1873-6009
Corresponding email
Published
2020-01-00
电子出版
2019-00-13
页码
103578
Language
English
Country/Region
Netherlands
NLM ID
8805644
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]