Both computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and time-resolved, three-dimensional, phase-contrast, magnetic resonance imaging (4D-flow MRI) enable visualization of time-varying blood flow structures and quantification of blood flow in vascular diseases. However, they are totally different. CFD is a method to calculate blood flow by solving the governing equations of fluid mechanics, so the obtained flow field is somewhat virtual. On the other hand, 4D-flow MRI measures blood flow in vivo, thus the flow is real. Recently, with the development and enhancement of computers, medical imaging techniques, and related software, blood flow analysis has become more accessible to clinicians and its usefulness in vascular diseases has been demonstrated. In this review, we have outlined the methods and characteristics of CFD and 4D-flow MRI, respectively. We have discussed the differences in the characteristics between both methods; reviewed the milestones achieved by blood flow analysis in various vascular diseases; and discussed the usefulness, challenges, and limitations of blood flow analysis. We have discussed the difficulties and limitations of current blood flow analysis. We have also discussed our views on future directions.
No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong
Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab
750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan
2F, Bldg F, University Science Park
Tel: 0531-88819269
Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.
Business Email
E-mail: [email protected]