Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 35993838 Published · ppublish English

Cutoff values for the best management strategy for magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound ablation for essential tremor.

Journal of neurosurgery ·Vol. 138 ·No. 1 ·2022-00-06

Torii J, Maesawa S, Nakatsubo D, Tsugawa T, Kato S, Ishizaki T, Takai S, Shibata M, Wakabayashi T, Tsuboi T, Suzuki M, Saito R

Abstract

The efficacy of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) ablation for essential tremor (ET) is well known; however, no prognostic factors have been established. The authors aimed to retrospectively investigate MRgFUS ablation outcomes and associated factors and to define the cutoff values for each prognostic factor. Sixty-four Japanese patients who underwent unilateral ventral intermediate nucleus thalamotomy with MRgFUS for ET were included. Follow-up evaluations were performed at 1 week and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Tremor suppression was evaluated using the Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST), and adverse effects were recorded postoperatively. Outcome-associated factors were examined preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively using multivariate analyses. The cutoff values for the prognostic factors were calculated using receiver operating characteristics. Percentage improvements in the CRST scores of the affected upper limb were 82.4%, 72.2%, 68.6%, and 65.9% at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Preoperatively, a high skull density ratio (SDR) (p ≤ 0.047), low CRST part B score (used to assess tremors during several tasks) (cutoff value 25, p ≤ 0.041), and nonoccurrence of resting tremors (p = 0.027) were significantly associated with improved tremor control. An intraoperatively high maximum mean temperature (cutoff value 52.5°C, p ≤ 0.047), postoperatively large lesion (cutoff value 3.9 mm in the anterior-posterior direction, p ≤ 0.002; cutoff value 5.0-5.55 mm in the superior-inferior direction, p ≤ 0.026), and small transducer focus correction (p ≤ 0.015) were also associated with improved tremor control. No valid cutoff value was found for SDR. Adverse effects (limb weakness, sensory disturbance, ataxia/walking disturbance, dysgeusia, dysarthria, and facial swelling) occurred transiently and were associated with high SDR, high temperature, high number of sonication sessions, large lesion, and occurrence of resting tremor. Patients who developed leg weakness experienced greater percentage improvement in tremors at 3 months postoperatively than those who did not. MRgFUS ablation could be used to achieve good tremor control with acceptable adverse effects in Japanese patients with ET. The relatively low SDR in Asian ethnic groups as compared with that of Western populations makes treatment difficult; however, the cutoff values obtained in this study may be useful for achieving good treatment outcomes even in such patients. Clinical trial registration no.: UMIN000026952 (University Hospital Medical Information Network). ACPC = anterior commissure-posterior commissure; AP = anterior to posterior; CRST = Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor; ET = essential tremor; MRgFUS = magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound; PC = posterior commissure; PSA = posterior subthalamic area; RL = right to left; ROC = receiver operating characteristic; SDR = skull density ratio; SI = superior to inferior; T2WI = T2-weighted imaging; VIM = ventral intermediate nucleus.

Keywords
essential tremor focused ultrasound ablation functional neurosurgery outcomes prognostic factors
Article Info
Journal
Journal of neurosurgery
Abbr.
J Neurosurg
ISSN
1933-0693
Published
2022-00-06
Language
English
Country/Region
United States
NLM ID
0253357
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]