Abstract
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) surgery is a clinical intervention to treat portal hypertension (PH) by deploying a covered stent to establish a shunt path for the portal vein (PV) system, and proper surgical strategy is of great importance to balance the shunt effect and the risk of complications. To understand the clinical strategies of the stent blind insertion and stent selection in clinic, this study investigated the effects of varying stent insertion positions and diameters on the PV hemodynamics and the shunt effect by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis of five post-TIPS subjects. The results showed that the successful TIPS surgeries of the five PH subjects were confirmed by quantifying their pressure drops. The stent insertion positions at the main portal vein (MPV) slightly affected the clinically concerned hemodynamic indexes (i.e., MPV pressure, stent-outlet velocity) and the shunt index (SI). This indicated that the position of the stent going into the MPV may not need to be deliberately selected. Moreover, the covered stents with 6 mm and 8 mm diameters slightly influenced the hemodynamics as well, but the large-diameter stent better improved the shunt effect compared to the small-diameter one. Despite this, the 6 mm stent was suggested thanks to the higher risk of the hepatic encephalopathy (HE) observed in clinic, which indicated the excessive shunt of the 8 mm stent. The current work revealed the effects of different TIPS strategies on the surgical outcome, and could be useful for potential clinical practices.
Keywords
Blind insertion
Computational fluid dynamics
Portal hypertension
Stent diameter
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt
MeSH 主题词
Humans
Portal Vein/surgery
Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic/adverse effects,methods
Hypertension, Portal/surgery
Stents/adverse effects
Treatment Outcome
作者与单位
共 8 位作者,点击展开单位 / ORCID
Jiang Lingyu
Biomechanics Laboratory, School of Biological Science & Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210096, China.
Han Hao
Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China; Medical Imaging Center, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Yang Jian
Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China; Medical Imaging Center, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Fang Runxin
Biomechanics Laboratory, School of Biological Science & Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210096, China.
Xin Ying
Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China; Medical Imaging Center, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Chen Qiang
Biomechanics Laboratory, School of Biological Science & Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210096, China. Electronic address:
[email protected].
Yao Jing
Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China; Medical Imaging Center, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China. Electronic address:
[email protected].
Li Zhiyong
Biomechanics Laboratory, School of Biological Science & Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210096, China; School of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD4001, Australia; Faculty of Sports Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, China.