主页 文献库文献详情
PMID: 41531143 已发表 · ppublish 英语

Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous Tocilizumab in Aortitis Associated With Giant Cell Arteritis: Multicenter Study of 196 Patients.

Arthritis care & research ·第 78 卷 ·第 9 期 ·2026-09-00

Secada-Gómez C, Loricera J, Martín-Gutiérrez A, Narváez J, Aldasoro V, Maiz O, Vela P, Romero-Yuste S, de Miguel E, Galíndez-Agirregoikoa E, Fernandez-López JC, Ferraz-Amaro I, Sanchez-Martín J, Moya-Alvarado P, Campos C, Castañeda S, Blanco R, Tocilizumab in Giant Cell Arteritis Spanish Collaborative Group

摘要

Aortitis associated with giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a severe manifestation, potentially leading to aneurysms and aortic dissection. Tocilizumab (TCZ) has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of GCA, both intravenously or subcutaneously administered. However, pivotal studies did not specifically evaluate aortic involvement, and no comparison of intravenous (IV) versus subcutaneous (SC) TCZ has been performed in patients with GCA-related aortitis. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of TCZ according to the administration route in patients with GCA-associated aortitis under clinical practice conditions. This was a multicenter observational study including 196 patients diagnosed with GCA-associated aortitis by imaging and treated with TCZ. Patients were grouped by administration route: IV or SC. GCA was diagnosed following the 1990 American College of Rheumatology criteria, temporal artery biopsy, and/or vascular imaging. Aortitis was identified using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan. Main outcomes included EULAR remission, clinical and imaging remission, absence of systemic inflammation, and glucocorticoid-sparing effect. Of 196 patients (148 women; mean age 69.8 ± SD 9.4 years), 110 received IV TCZ and 86 SC TCZ. Baseline clinical characteristics and markers of inflammation were comparable between groups. The glucocorticoid-sparing effect was similar. At 24-month follow-up, EULAR-defined remission was significantly more frequent in the SC group (83.3% vs 80.6%; P < 0.05). However, rates of imaging remission and absence of systemic inflammation were comparable between treatment arms. In this real-world cohort of GCA-associated aortitis, SC TCZ showed slightly greater effectiveness than IV TCZ in achieving EULAR-defined remission, whereas no significant differences were observed between both routes regarding imaging remission.

文献信息
期刊
Arthritis care & research
期刊简称
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)
ISSN
2151-4658
发表日期
2026-09-00
语言
英语
国家/地区
United States
NLM ID
101518086
分析服务
分析服务

联系地址

山东省济南市章丘区文博路2号

齐鲁师范学院 genelibs生信实验室

山东省济南市高新区舜华路750号

大学科技园北区F座4单元2楼

电话: 0531-88819269

微信公众号

关注微信订阅号,实时查看信息,关注医学生物学动态。


商务邮箱

E-mail: [email protected]