Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 42157336 Published · epublish English

Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure levels on splanchnic perfusion and intra-abdominal pressure: a prospective clinical-experimental study in lung-healthy patients.

Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care ·Vol. 6 ·No. 1 ·2026-05-19

Harnisch LO, Tampe D, Wieditz J, Moerer O

Abstract

High levels of airway pressure and especially positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) have been reported to reduce splanchnic perfusion and consequently lead to organ damage. We evaluated the effect of increasing PEEP levels on splanchnic perfusion and intra-abdominal pressure in a prospective clinical-experimental trial. In 20 neurosurgical patients, who were admitted to ICU due to the risk of postoperative complications, we measured the renal and splenic Doppler resistance index (RRI and SRI), intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), and the venous impedance index (VII) at different levels of PEEP (5 to 15 cmH2O) using a non-invasive ultrasound technique. Twenty patients were included in the final analysis. All RRI and SRI values remained within the reference range throughout the protocol, with low measurement variability (SD: RRI 0.06; SRI 0.09; VII 0.22). As PEEP levels increased from 5 to 15 cmH₂O, peak and plateau pressures rose significantly, while driving pressure remained constant. Differences between PEEP levels were not significant for IAP (η2G = 0.011, p = 0.298), RRI (η2G = 0.034, p = 0.253), SRI (η2G = 0.008, p = 0.719), or VII (η2G = 0.015, p = 0.070). No significant correlations with PEEP were found for RRI (r =-0.179, p = 0.081) or SRI (r = -0.130, p = 0.205). Mean arterial pressure was stable (84 ± 11 mmHg) and did not correlate with RRI (r = 0.195, p = 0.106), but correlated with SRI (r = 0.250, p = 0.037) and IAP (r = 0.275, p = 0.022). Exploratory mixed-effects models suggested a modest effect of PEEP on RRI (-0.002, p = 0.036) and a significant effect on VII (-0.007, p = 0.003), though patient-specific factors dominated the variance (R2c = 0.60-0.91). In our cohort of mechanically ventilated, hemodynamically stable, non-fluid-responsive, healthy patients, we found no effect of increasing PEEP levels on intra-abdominal pressure or surrogates of splanchnic perfusion, but an increase in renal venous drainage at higher PEEP levels; these findings warrant confirmation in larger samples. The study was registered in the German clinical trials register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00023895 on 15.02.2021).

Keywords
Arterial resistive index Intra-abdominal pressure Positive end-expiratory pressure Splanchnic circulation Venous impedance index Venous stasis
Article Info
Journal
Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care
Abbr.
J Anesth Analg Crit Care
ISSN
2731-3786
Published
2026-05-19
Language
English
Country/Region
England
NLM ID
9918591885906676
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]