Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 6744590 Published · ppublish English Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Carboxyhemoglobin, cotinine, and thiocyanate assay compared for distinguishing smokers from non-smokers.

Clinical chemistry ·Vol. 30 ·No. 8 ·1984-08-00 ·Pages 1377-80

Pojer R, Whitfield JB, Poulos V, Eckhard IF, Richmond R, Hensley WJ

Abstract

We compared cotinine, carboxyhemoglobin, and thiocyanate concentrations in blood sampled from 187 cigarette smokers and 181 non-smokers. All three differed significantly between smokers and non-smokers. Cotinine performed best as a test for assessing smoking status, with a sensitivity of 98% as compared with 94% for carboxyhemoglobin and 80% for thiocyanate, all at a specificity of 95%. These differences were statistically significant. Results by none of these three methods correlated well with number of cigarettes smoked per day.

MeSH Terms
Carboxyhemoglobin/analysis Chromatography, Gas Cotinine/blood Female Hemoglobins/analysis Humans Male Pyrrolidinones/blood Smoking Spectrophotometry Statistics as Topic Thiocyanates/blood
Chemicals
Hemoglobins Pyrrolidinones Thiocyanates Carboxyhemoglobin Cotinine
Authors & Affiliations
6 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Pojer R
Whitfield J B
Poulos V
Eckhard I F
Richmond R
Hensley W J
Article Info
Journal
Clinical chemistry
Abbr.
Clin Chem
ISSN
0009-9147
Published
1984-08-00
Pages
1377-80
Language
English
Region
England
NLM ID
9421549
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]