Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 8205021 Published · ppublish English Journal Article

Using patient and general practice characteristics to explain variations in cervical smear uptake rates.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.) ·Vol. 308 ·No. 6939 ·1994-05-14 ·Pages 1272-6

Majeed FA, Cook DG, Anderson HR, Hilton S, Bunn S, Stones C

Abstract

To produce practice and patient variables for general practices from census and family health services authority data, and to determine the importance of these variables in explaining variation in cervical smear uptake rates between practices. Population based study examining variations in cervical smear uptake rates among 126 general practices using routine data. Merton, Sutton, and Wandsworth Family Health Services Authority, which covers parts of inner and outer London. Percentage of women aged 25-64 years registered with a general practitioner who had undergone a cervical smear test during the five and a half years preceding 31 March 1992. Cervical smear uptake rates varied from 16.5% to 94.1%. The estimated percentage of practice population from ethnic minority groups correlated negatively with uptake rates (r = -0.42), as did variables associated with social deprivation such as overcrowding (r = -0.42), not owning a car (r = -0.41), and unemployment (r = -0.40). Percentage of practice population under 5 years of age correlated positively with uptake rate (r = 0.42). Rates were higher in practices with a female partner than in those without (66.6% v 49.1%; difference 17.5% (95% confidence interval 10.5% to 24.5%)), and in computerised than in non-computerised practices (64.5% v 50.5%; 14.0% (6.4% to 21.6%)). Rates were higher in larger practices. In a stepwise multiple regression model that explained 52% of variation, five factors were significant predictors of uptake rates: presence of a female partner; children under 5; overcrowding; number of women aged 35-44 as percentage of all women aged 25-64; change of address in past year. Over half of variation in cervical smear uptake rates can be explained by patient and practice variables derived from census and family health services authority data; these variables may have a role in explaining variations in performance of general practices and in producing adjusted measures of practice performance. Practices with a female partner had substantially higher uptake rates.

MeSH Terms
Adult Age Factors Demography Family Practice Female Humans London Middle Aged Partnership Practice Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data Regression Analysis Socioeconomic Factors Vaginal Smears/statistics & numerical data
Authors & Affiliations
6 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Majeed F A
Department of Public Health Sciences, St George's Hospital Medical School, London.
Cook D G
Anderson H R
Hilton S
Bunn S
Stones C
References (16)
16 references, click to expand
  1. Screening: the inadequacy of population registers.
    BMJ. 1989 Mar 4;298(6673):545-6 PMID: 2495109
  2. Provision of health promotion clinics in relation to population need: another example of the inverse care law?
    Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Feb;42(355):54-6 PMID: 1493005
  3. Identification of underprivileged areas.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 May 28;286(6379):1705-9 PMID: 6405943
  4. Underprivileged areas: validation and distribution of scores.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Dec 8;289(6458):1587-92 PMID: 6439333
  5. Wide variations in the night visiting rate.
    J R Coll Gen Pract. 1985 Aug;35(277):395 PMID: 4020759
  6. Cervical screening in an inner city area: response to a call system in general practice.
    BMJ. 1988 Nov 19;297(6659):1317-8 PMID: 3144375
  7. Providing census data for general practice. 1. Feasibility.
    J R Coll Gen Pract. 1987 Oct;37(303):448-50 PMID: 3505285
  8. Providing census data for general practice. 2. Usefulness.
    J R Coll Gen Pract. 1987 Oct;37(303):451-4 PMID: 3505286
  9. The efficacy of a national Family Health Services Authority based cervical cytology system.
    Health Trends. 1992;24(4):119-22 PMID: 10123981
  10. High and low incomes in general practice.
    BMJ. 1989 Apr 8;298(6678):932-4 PMID: 2497865
  11. Evaluation of the cervical cytology screening programme in an inner city health district.
    BMJ. 1989 Jul 8;299(6691):98-100 PMID: 2504348
  12. A total audit of preventive procedures in 45 practices caring for 430,000 patients.
    BMJ. 1990 Jun 9;300(6738):1501-3 PMID: 2372603
  13. Explaining outputs of primary health care: population and practice factors.
    BMJ. 1991 Jul 27;303(6796):225-9 PMID: 1653065
  14. Deprivation and general practitioner workload.
    BMJ. 1992 Feb 29;304(6826):529-34 PMID: 1510751
  15. General practice in Gloucestershire, Avon and Somerset: explaining variations in standards.
    Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Oct;42(363):415-8 PMID: 1466919
  16. Public health in inner London.
    BMJ. 1992 Nov 28;305(6865):1344-7 PMID: 1483084
Article Info
Journal
BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
Abbr.
BMJ
ISSN
0959-8138
Published
1994-05-14
Pages
1272-6
Language
English
Region
England
NLM ID
8900488
PMCID
PMC2540205
Subset
IM
Corrections
CommentIn
CommentIn
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]