Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 8911225 Published · ppublish English Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Lifetime prevalence, demographic risk factors, and diagnostic validity of nonaffective psychosis as assessed in a US community sample. The National Comorbidity Survey.

Archives of general psychiatry ·Vol. 53 ·No. 11 ·1996-11-00 ·Pages 1022-31

Kendler KS, Gallagher TJ, Abelson JM, Kessler RC

Abstract

We seek to estimate lifetime prevalence and demographic correlates of nonaffective psychosis in the US population assessed by a computer-analyzed structured interview and a senior clinician. In the National Comorbidity Survey, a probability subsample of 5877 respondents were administered a screen for psychotic symptoms. Based on the response to this screening, detailed follow-up interviews were conducted by mental health professionals (n = 454). The initial screen and clinical reinterview were reviewed by a senior clinician. Results are presented for narrowly (schizophrenia or schizophreniform disorder) and broadly (all nonaffective psychoses) defined psychotic illness. One or more psychosis screening questions were endorsed by 28.4% of individuals. By computer algorithm, lifetime prevalences of narrowly and broadly defined psychotic illness were 1.3% and 2.2%, respectively. Of those assigned a narrow diagnosis by the computer, the senior clinician assigned narrow and broad diagnoses to 10% and 37%, respectively. By clinician diagnosis, lifetime prevalence rates of narrowly and broadly defined psychosis were 0.2% and 0.7%, respectively. A clinician diagnosis of nonaffective psychosis was significantly associated with low income; unemployment a marital status of single, divorced, or separated; and urban residence Clinician confirmation of a computer diagnosis was predicted by hospitalization, neuroleptic treatment, duration of illness, enduring impairment, and thought disorder. Lifetime prevalence estimates of psychosis in community samples are strongly influenced by methods of assessment and diagnosis. Although results using computer algorithms were similar in the National Comorbidity Survey and Epidemiologic Catchment Area studies, diagnoses so obtained agreed poorly with clinical diagnoses. Accurate assessment of psychotic illness in epidemiologic samples may require collection of extensive contextual information for clinician review.

MeSH Terms
Adolescent Adult Comorbidity Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted Health Surveys Humans Mental Disorders/diagnosis,epidemiology Middle Aged Prevalence Probability Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/statistics & numerical data Psychotic Disorders/diagnosis,epidemiology Reproducibility of Results Risk Factors Schizophrenia/diagnosis,epidemiology United States/epidemiology
Authors & Affiliations
4 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Kendler K S
Department of Psychiatry, Medical College of Virginia/Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA.
Gallagher T J
Abelson J M
Kessler R C
Article Info
Journal
Archives of general psychiatry
Abbr.
Arch Gen Psychiatry
ISSN
0003-990X
Published
1996-11-00
Pages
1022-31
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
0372435
Subset
IM
Grants
NIMH NIH HHS · MH 46376 · United States
NIMH NIH HHS · MH 49098 · United States
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]