Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 9054278 Published · ppublish English Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Predictions of hospital mortality rates: a comparison of data sources.

Annals of internal medicine ·Vol. 126 ·No. 5 ·1997-03-01 ·Pages 347-54

Pine M, Norusis M, Jones B, Rosenthal GE

Abstract

Comparing hospital mortality rates requires accurate adjustment for patients' intrinsic differences. Commercial severity systems require either administrative data that omit vital clinical facts about patients' conditions at hospital admission or costly, time-consuming abstraction of medical records. The validity of supplementing administrative data with laboratory data has not been assessed. To compare risk-adjusted mortality predictions using administrative data alone; administrative data plus laboratory values; and the combination of administrative, laboratory, and clinical data. Retrospective cohort study. 30 acute care hospitals. 46,769 patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, congestive heart failure, or pneumonia. Each patient's probability of dying was estimated by using administrative data only (unrestricted administrative models), administrative data restricted to secondary diagnoses that are unlikely to be hospital-acquired complications (restricted administrative models), restricted administrative data plus laboratory data (laboratory models), and restricted administrative data plus laboratory and abstracted clinical data (clinical models). The unrestricted administrative models predicted death better than the restricted administrative models (average areas under the receiver-operating characteristic [ROC] curves, 0.87 and 0.75, respectively) and as well as the laboratory models and the clinical models (average areas under the ROC curves, 0.86 and 0.87, respectively). The good mortality predictions obtained by using the unrestricted administrative models result from inclusion of hospital-acquired complications that commonly precede death. The laboratory models ranked 93% of patients and 95% of hospitals in a manner similar to the clinical models; in comparison, rankings provided by the laboratory models were similar to those provided for 75% of patients and 69% of hospitals by the unrestricted administrative models and for 72% of patients and 77% of hospitals by the restricted administrative models. Adding laboratory data (often available electronically) to restricted administrative data sets can provide accurate predictions of inpatient death from acute myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, congestive heart failure, or pneumonia. This alternative avoids the cost of data abstraction and the serious errors associated with using administrative data alone.

MeSH Terms
Adult Aged Clinical Laboratory Techniques Comorbidity Data Collection/methods Hospital Mortality Humans Middle Aged ROC Curve Regression Analysis Risk Assessment Severity of Illness Index United States
Authors & Affiliations
4 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Pine M
Michael Pine and Associates, Inc., Chicago, IL 60615, USA.
Norusis M
Jones B
Rosenthal G E
Article Info
Journal
Annals of internal medicine
Abbr.
Ann Intern Med
ISSN
0003-4819
Published
1997-03-01
Pages
347-54
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
0372351
Subset
IM
Corrections
CommentIn
CommentIn
CommentIn
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]