Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 9103347 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Withholding research results in academic life science. Evidence from a national survey of faculty.

JAMA ·Vol. 277 ·No. 15 ·1997-04-16 ·Pages 1224-8

Blumenthal D, Campbell EG, Anderson MS, Causino N, Louis KS

Abstract

To identify the prevalence and determinants of data-withholding behaviors among academic life scientists. Mailed survey of 3394 life science faculty in the 50 universities that received the most funding from the National Institutes of Health in 1993. A total of 2167 faculty responded to the survey, a 64% response rate. Whether respondents delayed publication of their research results for more than 6 months and whether respondents refused to share research results with other university scientists in the last 3 years. A total of 410 respondents (19.8%) reported that publication of their research results had been delayed by more than 6 months at least once in the last 3 years to allow for patent application, to protect their scientific lead, to slow the dissemination of undesired results, to allow time to negotiate a patent, or to resolve disputes over the ownership of intellectual property. Also, 181 respondents (8.9%) reported refusing to share research results with other university scientists in the last 3 years. In multivariate analysis, participation in an academic-industry research relationship and engagement in the commercialization of university research were significantly associated with delays in publication. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were 1.34 (1.07-1.59) and 3.15 (2.88-3.41), respectively. Variables associated with refusing to share results were conducting research similar to the Human Genome Project (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.75-2.42), publication rate (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03), and engagement in commercialization of research (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 2.08-2.82). Withholding of research results is not a widespread phenomenon among life-science researchers. However, withholding is more common among the most productive and entrepreneurial faculty. These results also suggest that data withholding has affected a significant number of life-science faculty and further study on data-withholding practices is suggested.

Keywords
Biomedical and Behavioral Research Empirical Approach Genetics and Reproduction National Institutes of Health
MeSH Terms
Biological Science Disciplines Biomedical Research Contracts Data Collection Faculty Federal Government Female Genetic Research Humans Information Dissemination Intellectual Property Logistic Models Male Multivariate Analysis Patents as Topic Publishing Research Research Support as Topic Time Factors United States Universities
Authors & Affiliations
5 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Blumenthal D
Health Policy Research and Development Unit, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Campbell E G
Anderson M S
Causino N
Louis K S
Article Info
Journal
JAMA
Abbr.
JAMA
ISSN
0098-7484
Published
1997-04-16
Pages
1224-8
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
7501160
Subset
IM
Grants
NHGRI NIH HHS · HG00724-01 · United States
Corrections
CommentIn
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]