Abstract
Six transgenic tobacco lines, each homozygous for the beta-glucuronidase (GUS) gene at a different locus, and wild type were selfed and intercrossed to evaluate GUS activity in all possible hemizygous, homozygous and dihybrid combinations of GUS alleles. The transgenic lines are characterized by their GUS activity (two low, three intermediate, one high), T-DNA complexity (four single-copy, two more complex single-locus) and the presence of the chicken lysozyme matrix-associated region (MAR) around the full T-DNA (two lines). Gene action and interaction was analyzed by weighted linear regression with parameters for additivity, dominance and epistasis. The analysis showed that each of the four single-copy lines acted fully additively. In contrast, the two complex single-locus lines showed classical single-locus overdominance and were epistatic dominant over all other GUS alleles. The latter is manifested in severe suppression of GUS activity in dihybrid lines, irrespective of the presence of MAR elements around the GUS gene. Such elements apparently do not protect against epistatic dominance. The quantitative data suggested that the epistatic dominance and overdominance are based on the same molecular mechanism. Our approach of a genetic analysis of quantitative variation in well-characterized transgenic lines provides a powerful tool to gain insight into complex plant traits.
MeSH Terms
Alleles
Animals
Chickens
Crosses, Genetic
DNA, Bacterial/genetics
Epistasis, Genetic
Gene Dosage
Genes, Dominant/genetics
Genes, Reporter/genetics
Glucuronidase/genetics
Homozygote
Linear Models
Muramidase/genetics
Plants, Genetically Modified/enzymology,genetics
Plants, Toxic
Quantitative Trait, Heritable
Tobacco/genetics
Transgenes/genetics
Chemicals
DNA, Bacterial
T-DNA
Muramidase
Glucuronidase
Authors & Affiliations
5 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Nap J P
Department of Molecular Biology, CPRO-DLO, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
[email protected]
Conner A J
Mlynárová L
Stiekema W J
Jansen R C
References (11)
11 references, click to expand
-
Who's afraid of epistasis?
Nat Genet. 1996 Dec;14(4):371-3
PMID: 8944011
-
Transgene expression variability (position effect) of CAT and GUS reporter genes driven by linked divergent T-DNA promoters.
Plant Mol Biol. 1991 Jul;17(1):49-60
PMID: 1907871
-
Reduced Position Effect in Mature Transgenic Plants Conferred by the Chicken Lysozyme Matrix-Associated Region.
Plant Cell. 1994 Mar;6(3):417-426
PMID: 12244242
-
Analysis of the region in between two closely linked patatin genes: class II promoter activity in tuber, root and leaf.
Plant Mol Biol. 1992 Nov;20(4):683-94
PMID: 1450383
-
How and Why Do Plants Inactivate Homologous (Trans)genes?
Plant Physiol. 1995 Mar;107(3):679-685
PMID: 12228391
-
Transgene copy number can be positively or negatively associated with transgene expression.
Plant Mol Biol. 1993 Jan;21(1):17-26
PMID: 7678759
-
Complex interactions of new quantitative trait loci, Sluc1, Sluc2, Sluc3, and Sluc4, that influence the susceptibility to lung cancer in the mouse.
Nat Genet. 1996 Dec;14(4):465-7
PMID: 8944028
-
Mapping polygenes.
Annu Rev Genet. 1993;27:205-33
PMID: 8122902
-
A complex issue.
Trends Genet. 1995 Dec;11(12):463
PMID: 8533160
-
The MAR-Mediated Reduction in Position Effect Can Be Uncoupled from Copy Number-Dependent Expression in Transgenic Plants.
Plant Cell. 1995 May;7(5):599-609
PMID: 12242378
-
Epigenetic repeat-induced gene silencing (RIGS) in Arabidopsis.
Plant Mol Biol. 1993 Sep;22(6):1067-85
PMID: 8400126