Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 16584544 Published · epublish English Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review Systematic Review

The effects of the Two-Week Rule on NHS colorectal cancer diagnostic services: a systematic literature review.

BMC health services research ·Vol. 6 ·2006-04-03 ·Pages 43

Thorne K, Hutchings HA, Elwyn G

Abstract

The Two-Week Rule (TWR) was introduced to ensure that all patients with a suspected colorectal cancer (CRC) saw a hospital specialist within 14 days of an urgent GP referral. Guidelines were available to GPs to facilitate the appropriate TWR referral of patients exhibiting high-risk CRC symptoms. We aimed to evaluate the TWR and its CRC detection rate on NHS CRC diagnostic services by performing a literature search and critically appraising the peer-reviewed studies. Only 12 studies were eligible for inclusion. Data was collected and overall results were given as weighted averages. The studies identified indicated that only 10.3% of patients referred by the TWR were eventually diagnosed with CRC. When examining the referral origin of all CRC patients diagnosed during the time of the studies, 24% had been referred using the TWR, 24.1% were referred as emergency cases, and 52.4% were referred using alternative routes. No evidence was found to indicate that the TWR had resulted in identifying CRC patients at an earlier, more treatable stage of their disease. The TWR referral system needs to be improved to increase the number of CRC patients referred using this fast track method as they present to their GP. The TWR and new NICE Guidelines for the referral of patients with suspected cancer should be independently evaluated.

MeSH Terms
Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis Diagnostic Services/statistics & numerical data Early Diagnosis England Hospitals, Public/standards,statistics & numerical data Humans Medicine/standards,statistics & numerical data Practice Guidelines as Topic Referral and Consultation/standards Risk Factors Specialization State Medicine/standards,statistics & numerical data Time Factors Wales
Authors & Affiliations
3 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Thorne Kymberley
School of Medicine, University of Wales, Swansea, UK. [email protected]
Hutchings Hayley A
Elwyn Glyn
References (16)
16 references, click to expand
  1. Diagnosis of colorectal cancer in primary care: the evidence base for guidelines.
    Fam Pract. 2004 Feb;21(1):99-106 PMID: 14760054
  2. A study on the routes of referral for patients with colorectal cancer and its affect on the time to surgery and pathological stage.
    Colorectal Dis. 2004 Nov;6(6):428-31 PMID: 15521930
  3. Fast-track barium enema: meeting the two-week wait rule for patients with suspected colorectal cancer.
    Colorectal Dis. 2005 May;7(3):241-4 PMID: 15859961
  4. ACPGBI Referral guidelines for colorectal cancer.
    Colorectal Dis. 2002 Jul;4(4):287-297 PMID: 12780604
  5. The two week referral for colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis.
    Colorectal Dis. 2004 Mar;6(2):85-91 PMID: 15008904
  6. Clinical features of colorectal cancer before diagnosis: a population-based case-control study.
    Br J Cancer. 2005 Aug 22;93(4):399-405 PMID: 16106247
  7. Variations in the evaluation of colorectal cancer risk.
    Colorectal Dis. 2005 May;7(3):254-62 PMID: 15859964
  8. Referral guidelines for colorectal cancer--do they work?
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2003 Mar;85(2):107-10 PMID: 12648341
  9. Evolution of the two-week rule pathway--direct access colonoscopy vs outpatient appointments: one year's experience and patient satisfaction survey.
    Colorectal Dis. 2005 Sep;7(5):480-5 PMID: 16108885
  10. Guidelines, compliance, and effectiveness: a 12 months' audit in an acute district general healthcare trust on the two week rule for suspected colorectal cancer.
    Postgrad Med J. 2002 Dec;78(926):748-51 PMID: 12509694
  11. Prediction of colorectal cancer by a patient consultation questionnaire and scoring system: a prospective study.
    Lancet. 2002 Jul 27;360(9329):278-83 PMID: 12147370
  12. Referral of suspected colorectal cancer: have guidelines made a difference?
    Br J Gen Pract. 2004 Aug;54(505):608-10 PMID: 15296561
  13. The fourteen-day rule and colorectal cancer.
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002 Nov;84(6):386-8 PMID: 12484576
  14. How has the 'two-week wait' rule affected the presentation of colorectal cancer?
    Colorectal Dis. 2005 Sep;7(5):450-3 PMID: 16108880
  15. The Department of Health's "two week standard" for bowel cancer: is it working?
    Gut. 2004 Mar;53(3):387-91 PMID: 14960522
  16. Pitfalls in the construction of cancer guidelines demonstrated by the analyses of colorectal referrals.
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005 Nov;87(6):419-26 PMID: 16263008
Article Info
Journal
BMC health services research
Abbr.
BMC Health Serv Res
ISSN
1472-6963
Published
2006-04-03
Epub
2006-00-03
Pages
43
Language
English
Region
England
NLM ID
101088677
PMCID
PMC1479333
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: [email protected]