Abstract
Segregation of sister chromatids to opposite spindle poles during anaphase is dependent on the prior capture of sister kinetochores by microtubules extending from opposite spindle poles (bi-orientation). If sister kinetochores attach to microtubules from the same pole (syntelic attachment), the kinetochore-spindle pole connections must be re-oriented to be converted to proper bi-orientation. This re-orientation is facilitated by Aurora B kinase (Ipl1 in budding yeast), which eliminates kinetochore-spindle pole connections that do not generate tension. Mps1 is another evolutionarily conserved protein kinase, required for spindle-assembly checkpoint and, in some organisms, for duplication of microtubule-organizing centers. Separately from these functions, however, Mps1 has an important role in chromosome segregation. Here we show that, in budding yeast, Mps1 has a crucial role in establishing sister-kinetochore bi-orientation on the mitotic spindle. Failure in bi-orientation with inactive Mps1 is not due to a lack of kinetochore-spindle pole connections by microtubules, but due to a defect in properly orienting the connections. Mps1 promotes re-orientation of kinetochore-spindle pole connections and eliminates those that do not generate tension between sister kinetochores. We did not find evidence that Ipl1 regulates Mps1 or vice versa; therefore, they play similar, but possibly independent, roles in facilitating bi-orientation.
MeSH Terms
Aurora Kinases
Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins
Kinetochores/metabolism
Metaphase/physiology
Microtubules/metabolism
Protein Kinases/metabolism
Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/metabolism
Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/metabolism
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/metabolism
Saccharomycetales
Spindle Apparatus/metabolism
Chemicals
Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins
Protein Kinases
Protein-Tyrosine Kinases
Aurora Kinases
IPL1 protein, S cerevisiae
Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases
MPS1 protein, S cerevisiae
Authors & Affiliations
3 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Maure Jean-François
Wellcome Trust Centre for Gene Regulation & Expression, College of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, MSI/WTB/JBC Complex, Dundee DD1 5EH, UK.
Kitamura Etsushi
Tanaka Tomoyuki U
References (27)
27 references, click to expand
-
Evidence that the Ipl1-Sli15 (Aurora kinase-INCENP) complex promotes chromosome bi-orientation by altering kinetochore-spindle pole connections.
Cell. 2002 Feb 8;108(3):317-29
PMID: 11853667
-
Kinetochore microtubule interaction during S phase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Genes Dev. 2007 Dec 15;21(24):3319-30
PMID: 18079178
-
Establishing biorientation occurs with precocious separation of the sister kinetochores, but not the arms, in the early spindle of budding yeast.
Cell. 2000 Mar 17;100(6):619-33
PMID: 10761928
-
Tension between two kinetochores suffices for their bi-orientation on the mitotic spindle.
Nature. 2004 Mar 4;428(6978):93-7
PMID: 14961024
-
Phospho-regulation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments by the Aurora kinase Ipl1p.
Cell. 2002 Oct 18;111(2):163-72
PMID: 12408861
-
Cohesins: chromosomal proteins that prevent premature separation of sister chromatids.
Cell. 1997 Oct 3;91(1):35-45
PMID: 9335333
-
Centrosomes and checkpoints: the MPS1 family of kinases.
Oncogene. 2002 Sep 9;21(40):6161-9
PMID: 12214245
-
A pathway containing the Ipl1/aurora protein kinase and the spindle midzone protein Ase1 regulates yeast spindle assembly.
Dev Cell. 2007 Sep;13(3):433-45
PMID: 17765685
-
Genetic manipulation of centromere function.
Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Jul;7(7):2397-405
PMID: 3302676
-
GFP tagging of budding yeast chromosomes reveals that protein-protein interactions can mediate sister chromatid cohesion.
Curr Biol. 1996 Dec 1;6(12):1599-608
PMID: 8994824
-
Chemical genetics reveals a role for Mps1 kinase in kinetochore attachment during mitosis.
Curr Biol. 2005 Jan 26;15(2):160-5
PMID: 15668173
-
Kinetochore capture and bi-orientation on the mitotic spindle.
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005 Dec;6(12):929-42
PMID: 16341079
-
Budding yeast chromosome structure and dynamics during mitosis.
J Cell Biol. 2001 Mar 19;152(6):1255-66
PMID: 11257125
-
Molecular mechanisms of microtubule-dependent kinetochore transport toward spindle poles.
J Cell Biol. 2007 Jul 16;178(2):269-81
PMID: 17620411
-
How cells get the right chromosomes.
Science. 1997 Jan 31;275(5300):632-7
PMID: 9005842
-
Chromosome micromanipulation. 3. Spindle fiber tension and the reorientation of mal-oriented chromosomes.
J Cell Biol. 1969 Oct;43(1):40-50
PMID: 5824068
-
Correcting improper chromosome-spindle attachments during cell division.
Nat Cell Biol. 2004 Mar;6(3):232-7
PMID: 14767480
-
Splitting the chromosome: cutting the ties that bind sister chromatids.
Science. 2000 May 26;288(5470):1379-85
PMID: 10827941
-
The conserved protein kinase Ipl1 regulates microtubule binding to kinetochores in budding yeast.
Genes Dev. 1999 Mar 1;13(5):532-44
PMID: 10072382
-
A chemical switch for inhibitor-sensitive alleles of any protein kinase.
Nature. 2000 Sep 21;407(6802):395-401
PMID: 11014197
-
MPS1 and MPS2: novel yeast genes defining distinct steps of spindle pole body duplication.
J Cell Biol. 1991 Aug;114(4):745-54
PMID: 1869587
-
Molecular mechanisms of kinetochore capture by spindle microtubules.
Nature. 2005 Apr 21;434(7036):987-94
PMID: 15846338
-
The small molecule Hesperadin reveals a role for Aurora B in correcting kinetochore-microtubule attachment and in maintaining the spindle assembly checkpoint.
J Cell Biol. 2003 Apr 28;161(2):281-94
PMID: 12707311
-
Transient sister chromatid separation and elastic deformation of chromosomes during mitosis in budding yeast.
Cell. 2000 Jun 23;101(7):763-75
PMID: 10892747
-
The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time.
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007 May;8(5):379-93
PMID: 17426725
-
Mps1 phosphorylation of Dam1 couples kinetochores to microtubule plus ends at metaphase.
Curr Biol. 2006 Aug 8;16(15):1489-501
PMID: 16890524
-
Cohesin ensures bipolar attachment of microtubules to sister centromeres and resists their precocious separation.
Nat Cell Biol. 2000 Aug;2(8):492-9
PMID: 10934469